Peters_Nuts
Premiership Player
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2024
- Posts
- 3,315
- Reaction score
- 11,060
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Nice.
Reminds me of another, more famous, airborne handball.![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

LIVE: Carlton v Geelong - Rd 12 - 7:40PM Fri
Squiggle tips Cats at 69% chance -- What's your tip? -- Injury Lists » -- All Rd 12 Games
Fantasy Footy Notice Image Round 12
SuperCoach Rd 12 SC Talk - Trade Talk - Capt/VC - 2026 Fight MND Comp ,//, AFL Fantasy Rd 12 AFF Talk - AF Trades - Capt/VC
Nice.
Reminds me of another, more famous, airborne handball.![]()
I wish HDM well.Biggest difference is that Shaw follows the path almost all the good players do of playing early and often while HDM is not.
There were criticisms of Shaw early but he was playing seniors. He arrived at Collingwood as 17 yo and debuted as a young 18yo playing 5 games at the end of 1978 including 2 finals. 15 games the next year and 18 in his 3rd season including the Grand Final. He turned 20 late in July that year. (HDM was 20 in Sept 25 for comparison, his 2nd season)
Basically at the age HDM is now Shawry had played 38 senior games including 6 finals and a GF. He would go onto play 20+ plus games a year for the next 6 seasons.
Shaw may have struggled a little with senior footy early but he was a senior player early and played little 2nds footy after his 1st season. HDM is a mile off that.
I’d be surprised if it’s a focus area. Feeding the ball to the likes of Naicos, Jaicos, Steele and Crisp seems his go and the work to take a poor kick to an average kick at the top level is monumental.Neds biggest issue is his disposal efficiency ..he needs to be working on this more than anything else
This reads like a school report on a kid where it seems it doesn't really believe what it's saying. Except it wouldn't be using the words 'failed' or 'appalling'. Not sure 'scathing' or even 'laconic' would pass muster either.I was scathing of Allan's laconic attitude in in the opener against GWS last year - his chasing was appallingly and he lacked urgency. By mid year I thought he had turned the corner with some good games, but failed to hold his spot. I think his best is more than good enough, but consistency in effort and application is needed.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
“Last years game against GWS was a game of beauty and should be rewatched to build character.” Is that better? NoSpin expressed his thoughts, I thought very well. Allan was dropped multiple times last year. And won the clubs best young player.This reads like a school report on a kid where it seems it doesn't really believe what it's saying. Except it wouldn't be using the words 'failed' or 'appalling'. Not sure 'scathing' or even 'laconic' would pass muster either.
Completely different era's though doc. There's no way Tony would have played 200 games in today's footy. HDM would probably have been a gun back then. Harry's VFL form would have stood up back then. Ray was a much better player and he chose to leave to play VFA, just to put it into context. Neville was the most talented of all 3 but he was a loose cannon.Biggest difference is that Shaw follows the path almost all the good players do of playing early and often while HDM is not.
There were criticisms of Shaw early but he was playing seniors. He arrived at Collingwood as 17 yo and debuted as a young 18yo playing 5 games at the end of 1978 including 2 finals. 15 games the next year and 18 in his 3rd season including the Grand Final. He turned 20 late in July that year. (HDM was 20 in Sept 25 for comparison, his 2nd season)
Basically at the age HDM is now Shawry had played 38 senior games including 6 finals and a GF. He would go onto play 20+ plus games a year for the next 6 seasons.
Shaw may have struggled a little with senior footy early but he was a senior player early and played little 2nds footy after his 1st season. HDM is a mile off that.
Now I get what happens here - it's all clear now........Edited. GC. This isn't a dig at you. I realised that I replied to the wrong person...
That’s all true.Biggest difference is that Shaw follows the path almost all the good players do of playing early and often while HDM is not.
There were criticisms of Shaw early but he was playing seniors. He arrived at Collingwood as 17 yo and debuted as a young 18yo playing 5 games at the end of 1978 including 2 finals. 15 games the next year and 18 in his 3rd season including the Grand Final. He turned 20 late in July that year. (HDM was 20 in Sept 25 for comparison, his 2nd season)
Basically at the age HDM is now Shawry had played 38 senior games including 6 finals and a GF. He would go onto play 20+ plus games a year for the next 6 seasons.
Shaw may have struggled a little with senior footy early but he was a senior player early and played little 2nds footy after his 1st season. HDM is a mile off that.
was thinking similar things. Different attributes needed in 2026. Pace is one of them. Tony was what needed then. Harry is not what we need now.Completely different era's though doc. There's no way Tony would have played 200 games in today's footy. HDM would probably have been a gun back then. Harry's VFL form would have stood up back then. Ray was a much better player and he chose to leave to play VFA, just to put it into context. Neville was the most talented of all 3 but he was a loose cannon.
the way I look at it manic is I think IMO we can confidently say neither Allan or HDM will be A graders.The question remains whether they can become role players at afl lvl.Completely different era's though doc. There's no way Tony would have played 200 games in today's footy. HDM would probably have been a gun back then. Harry's VFL form would have stood up back then. Ray was a much better player and he chose to leave to play VFA, just to put it into context. Neville was the most talented of all 3 but he was a loose cannon.
You're probably right about the 2 lads. I just like to make a couple of early predictions each year based on the quality we have available. I'm a bit more bullish on both but I've been wrong before. We definitely need more A grade midfield talent thoughthe way I look at it manic is I think IMO we can confidently say neither Allan or HDM will be A graders.The question remains whether they can become role players at afl lvl.
The issue for our list atm is we need A graders, in particular in the engine room to compete with the other top teams. We are far too reliant on daicos and an injury to him is basically any flag hopes taking a nose dive.
Degoey injury free for a couple more seasons will help but we need to find some A grade support. The other top teams midfields bat deep. We have a few that can rotate through but not of the quality realistically needed.
Maybe they prefer ketchup.This reads like a school report on a kid where it seems it doesn't really believe what it's saying. Except it wouldn't be using the words 'failed' or 'appalling'. Not sure 'scathing' or even 'laconic' would pass muster either.
Unfortunately I’ve moved onto the new batch, I just don’t think they are going to make it. I’m now looking forward to seeing how the new kids training reports transition to the real stuffYou're probably right about the 2 lads. I just like to make a couple of early predictions each year based on the quality we have available. I'm a bit more bullish on both but I've been wrong before. We definitely need more A grade midfield talent though
That’s the real hole on our list currently. Unless it’s one of Jaicos or McCreery going through the middle permanently with an AA squad level season I don’t see that next up A grade mid currently on the list. Ultimately we either need a down year to reset and find one through the draft or we go all in on the the Bailey/ Butters long shot…the way I look at it manic is I think IMO we can confidently say neither Allan or HDM will be A graders.The question remains whether they can become role players at afl lvl.
The issue for our list atm is we need A graders, in particular in the engine room to compete with the other top teams. We are far too reliant on daicos and an injury to him is basically any flag hopes taking a nose dive.
Degoey injury free for a couple more seasons will help but we need to find some A grade support. The other top teams midfields bat deep. We have a few that can rotate through but not of the quality realistically needed.
I think where Long’s potential improvement comes from would be an improved tank.I’d be surprised if it’s a focus area. Feeding the ball to the likes of Naicos, Jaicos, Steele and Crisp seems his go and the work to take a poor kick to an average kick at the top level is monumental.
His biggest issue to work through IMV is taking his ball winning game from average to above average whilst sticking to structure. For a guy to be first choice midfield and averaging 3.5 clearances and 8 contested possessions isn’t cutting it against the likes of Newcombe, Neale, Danger, Serong, Rowell etc. if he’s not a first choice mid what is he?
Adding an aerial presence seems a cherry on top to me, but it’s a significantly greater need than improving his ball use.
There must have been because Anabele has just posted this on fb so you can bet that Jen would also have been there and will have something for us.Any training today?
Hopefully he can increase his midfield minutes. He’s a natural endurance athlete who I think was either first or second in the 2km run in the pre-draft trials as an 18 year old so he should be able to get his midfield minutes up around the 80% plus range now that he’s completed a couple of preseasons and starting to enter his prime.I think where Long’s potential improvement comes from would be an improved tank.
He generally only would play around 70-75% game time last year which is quite low for a full time inside mid.
Maybe he was already capable of 80%+ but they didn’t view him as one of our best players so preferred to spend the minutes on someone else? Not sure.Hopefully he can increase his midfield minutes. He’s a natural endurance athlete who I think was either first or second in the 2km run in the pre-draft trials as an 18 year old so he should be able to get his midfield minutes up around the 80% plus range now that he’s completed a couple of preseasons and starting to enter his prime.
Do you think this was only about his endurance or that Fly tended to go with the older core like Sidebottom, Pendlebury etc getting some extra time than Long because he trusts the tried and true? I havent read anything from training reports that says Long is struggling with endurance. Long played a very good final against the Crows so maybe the coach will trust him more now.Hopefully he can increase his midfield minutes. He’s a natural endurance athlete who I think was either first or second in the 2km run in the pre-draft trials as an 18 year old so he should be able to get his midfield minutes up around the 80% plus range now that he’s completed a couple of preseasons and starting to enter his prime.
Is one of the best endurance runners on the listI think where Long’s potential improvement comes from would be an improved tank.
He generally only would play around 70-75% game time last year which is quite low for a full time inside mid.
I was having a bit of fun rather than having a shot at No Spin. It just reminded me of school reports where you say the kids got talent but doesn't work harder enough to show the results of it, while at the same time you are wondering whether the ability to succeed is really there in the first place. Which is pretty much where we are at with Allen.“Last years game against GWS was a game of beauty and should be rewatched to build character.” Is that better? NoSpin expressed his thoughts, I thought very well. Allan was dropped multiple times last year. And won the clubs best young player.
Having looked back at his time trials, it appears you are right, though that leaves open the question of why his minutes were so low.Is one of the best endurance runners on the list
It could be because he's limited to playing midfield. He needs to add some forward craft or something. His role would be very physically demandingHaving looked back at his time trials, it appears you are right, though that leaves open the question of why his minutes were so low.
I would think difficult for a player to leave a big impact in games on a consistent basis whilst only averaging around 70% game time.
I wonder if that will change this season.