Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Opening Round
The Golden Ticket - Official AFL on-seller of MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
absolute spud
absolute spud
I'll put my hand up - I'm very, very fecking bitter about his GF game. He was rubbish and went missing on the biggest possible occasion. In case people have forgotten, we lost the Grand Final we should have won, and the non-existent forward line was directly responsible for it. So I'll refrain from exhibiting gerbil-faced optimism about 2009 just yet. Thompson might not be blaming individuals, but I am. Because it's true.
However, he wasn't quite the worst (Stokes took that honour), and he wasn't the only one. And Varcoe did absolutely play a great game in the prelim final. The question now is how he responds. If he has a ripper pre-season, he deserves a spot in round 1. But for me, out of Varcoe, Stokes and Byrnes there's only room for one. Because Lonergan makes way for Hawkins, and someone else has to make way for Gamble.
I agree Varcoe played badly in the GF. But in my opinion he was the key to us even making the GF.
So I say: Don't blame Varcoe for losing the GF, but praise him for getting us there in the first place.
I agree Varcoe played badly in the GF. But in my opinion he was the key to us even making the GF in the first place by way of his play against the Bulldogs
Logic said that Bomber couldn't have gone into the GF with all of the injured Kelly, Chapman, Varcoe and Stokes. I would have been happy with any of those 4 missing the GF for Wojo
So I say: Don't blame Varcoe for losing the GF, but praise him for getting us there in the first place. The PF performance is what he will bring regularly to the table as he gets more experience and confidence
Since when was Varcoe injured for the Grand Final? He looked pretty good to me. Stop making excuses and acknowledge he played a shit game. As I mentioned in my post, he was not the only one, nor was he the worst, but he was absolutely one of the main culprits.
And let's not exaggerate, he played a fantastic game in the prelim, but he wasn't BOG or anything. To me the defence won us that game, they kept the Bulldogs to their lowest score of the season.
So we should cut him because he had a shit GF? Well we should start another thread entitled
"Where are we going to get a FF, CHF and Ruckman from" because Loners, Mooney and Ottens were pretty shit in that game.
As usual there are a bunch on the board who are willing to sacrifice a player before he is even developed.
Since when was Varcoe injured for the Grand Final? He looked pretty good to me. Stop making excuses and acknowledge he played a shit game. As I mentioned in my post, he was not the only one, nor was he the worst, but he was absolutely one of the main culprits.
And let's not exaggerate, he played a fantastic game in the prelim, but he wasn't BOG or anything. To me the defence won us that game, they kept the Bulldogs to their lowest score of the season.
Travis has played 34 AFL games.
If you want to play it that way you would have delisted Scarlett after 34 game because he got creamed early in his career.
Jimmy Bartel would have been shown the ass, his first 34 games were average.
Ling also gone.
Yeah, Ablett gone (Travis after 34 games averaged the same amount of disposals per game at the same stage as ablett after 34.)
Milburn? Gone
Chapman? Gone
My Point? How can you judge someones potential on 34 games. This is the only club board on bigfooty where a player will get bagged after playing a good game.
Travis is one of those players that sit on the borderline at the club. He has potential and talent, but is yet to show any consistency in his game at AFL level. Therefore, he puts himself in that section of Geelong players open to those feral Cats supporters who think that bagging him is their god given right.
The only problem with baggers is that none of them have ever played AFL level football, but yet they seem to know more about it than anyone else. Their opinions are more valuable (they would like us to think) than even the coaching staff of the club (who actually know our players inside and out).

The footy pundits often say that a player doesn't hit their straps until 50+ games at AFL level. Travis has played 34 sometimes inspiring and sometimes disappointing games. He has talent, no one can deny it. He just needs more consistency and be more of a play maker.
let's hope Travis has a break out year in 2009. Then I am sure all his baggers will be claiming they always knew he would make it and they had never said any bad thing about him. Stoopid people!
No arguments from me about hoping he has a break out year.
While I don't consider myself a bagger I have serious reservations about him ever amounting to anything more then a fringe player, having said that I hope I end up with egg on my face and he delivers on the potential many see in him, I'll be more then happy to say I was wrong.