Post BF Upgrade Feedback - Click Here

Remove this Banner Ad

Unbelievable

  • Thread starter Thread starter M29
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

M

M29

Brownlow Medallist
Veteran 10k Posts
Joined
Mar 31, 2001
Posts
13,147
Reaction score
25
Location
Essendon
AFL Club
Essendon
Other Teams
Dons
The family of that dog that pack r*ped those young women have done themselves (and the lebonese/muslim community) no favours tonight on 60 minutes. Absolutely terrible. I couldn't believe what I was hearing.

One can only assume the **** will hit the fan this week in sydney.
 
I didn't watch 60 minutes tonight after I saw the promos that they have been showing during the week. Throughout the whole trial, the family and friends of the pack leader have always been in denial of his actions and pleaded his innocence and knew that this would be still be the case.

I think it's a poor publicity grab from 60 minutes to show this interview, they knew that the family and friends' views were disturbing and contraversial, knowing full well that the general public would be angered by their comments and would watch the interview in large numbers.

I can't speak for certain since I didn't watch the interview and am not aware of the comments which took place, though nevertheless I believe that airing this interview would have done no good to either the victims, the family/friends of the accused, the lebanese/muslim community particularly in Sydney, and the community as a whole in south west Sydney. All this sort of interview does is to increase the friction simmering in southwest Sydney and increases the likelihood of attacks occuring between one group against another (often attacking innocent parties too).

Let the victims get on with their lives, they don't want to see what the family/friends of the convicted think!
 
Yes, it was very poor I thought on 60 mins behalf, but really do we expect any less of them? That interview would harm the muslim community, most of which had nothing to do with the case anyway. But the family on it, unreal.

I think it was the daughter in law (brothers wife) said that the girl who was r*ped 'did cosent' to it. And when asked why she would said that girls these days are into going around with heaps of guys. It was such bad viewing I couldn't stop.

Where the **** do these people come from? I felt like smashing the TV. She and the other members of the family made some ridiculous ****en comments.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Originally posted by M29
I think it was the daughter in law (brothers wife) said that the girl who was r*ped 'did cosent' to it. And when asked why she would said that girls these days are into going around with heaps of guys. It was such bad viewing I couldn't stop.

Where the **** do these people come from? I felt like smashing the TV. She and the other members of the family made some ridiculous ****en comments.
Click to expand...

Yeah, the main reason I didn't watch because I knew they would be comments made which would make me angry. The family members must have either been flashed a large amount of money or are incredibly stupid to have gone ahead with the interview.

I think Channel Nine should be more careful with their programming and choose not in future to show potentially inciting interviews like this, otherwise the prospect of race riots in Sydney could become a reality.
 
Originally posted by Sydneyfan

I think Channel Nine should be more careful with their programming and choose not in future to show potentially inciting interviews like this, otherwise the prospect of race riots in Sydney could become a reality.
Click to expand...

Has the possibility occurred to you that's what media outlets like Channel 9 want to happen?
 
Originally posted by Sydneyfan

I think Channel Nine should be more careful with their programming and choose not in future to show potentially inciting interviews like this, otherwise the prospect of race riots in Sydney could become a reality.
Click to expand...

They don't care. Hell, a riot would be great for them. They be able to pump out more **** stories and 'exclusives'.
 
Originally posted by wagstaff


Has the possibility occurred to you that's what media outlets like Channel 9 want to happen?
Click to expand...

It's crossed my mind before but I'd like to think that media outlets would never stoop that low, maybe I'm naive! ;)
 
Originally posted by Sydneyfan


It's crossed my mind before but I'd like to think that media outlets would never stoop that low, maybe I'm naive! ;)
Click to expand...

Only things they are interested in is ratings......which means money.........

with 60 Minutes and A Current Affair being the best in the business at it............

what would be more interesting to find out is did those being interviewed get paid anything for the interviews.........it wouldn't surprise me if they did
 
Originally posted by Sydneyfan


It's crossed my mind before but I'd like to think that media outlets would never stoop that low, maybe I'm naive! ;)
Click to expand...

The reason they would stoop so low is that, bit by bit, the commerical media outlets and the government are using the Muslim/Lebanese community as one of the scapegoats for the socio-economic problems Australian society faces.

Think about it, who would the Murdochs/Packers/Howards/Creans rather have the general population directing their frustrations and blame towards - themselves or a particular racial/religious group that can be easily demonised?
 
I have it on good authority that the mother of the rapist was constantly yelling out '****' in her native toungue at all the girls who were on the stand
 
Originally posted by ian_rocks
I have it on good authority that the mother of the rapist was constantly yelling out '****' in her native toungue at all the girls who were on the stand
Click to expand...

Absolute chucking farmers, the lot of them, including Channel 9.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Spoonerism, like a cunning stunt :D :D
 
Dammit, this thread is about the tossers that pack r*ped those girls> ****ers.
I saw Unbelievable and thought it was an EMF thread!
 
this is what the bastard looks like. his name is Bilal Skaf. hope jail wipes that cheesy grin off his face.

07RAPE.jpg


Rape gang members named
By Sarah Crichton, Andrew Stevenson
September 7 2002


A New South Wales judge yesterday lifted a suppression order on the identities of the ringleader of a rape gang and three of his henchman, saying there was great merit in the public denunciation of serious offences.

The leader of the gang responsible for three attacks on four women in August 2000 is Bilal Skaf, also known as Bill, and "X" throughout four separate trials conducted late last year and this year. He was sentenced to 55 years in jail a fortnight ago.

From his arrest, until he was sentenced, Skaf has scoffed at police and made a mockery of court proceedings. The photograph, right, was taken moments after he high-fived a fellow gang member.

Three others in the gang that r*ped four women during three attacks in August 2000 were also named by Judge Michael Finnane: Mohammed Sanoussi, now 18, his younger brother Mahmoud Sanoussi, now 17 and Tayyab Sheikh, 18.

Judge Finnane said he had decided to lift the restrictions on naming Sheikh and the Sanoussi brothers because the gang rape was "one of the greatest outrages perpetrated on the community in Sydney" and one organised "militarily". He said the trial had been conducted publicly and there was great merit in there being public denunciation of serious offences.

Mohammed Sanoussi was sentenced yesterday to a maximum 21 years and three months jail for his part in the abduction and rape of two 16-year-olds taken from Chatswood to Greenacre on August 10, 2000, and a six-hour assault 20 days later on an 18-year-old taken from a train in Bankstown and r*ped at three sites. He will be eligible for parole in June 2012 after serving 12 years.

His younger brother Mahmoud was sentenced to 11 years and three months and must serve six-and-a-half years minimum. Sentencing the pair, the judge ordered that they both be entitled to serve their time until age 21 in a juvenile justice institution and that the brothers should spend their sentences in the same prison.

Sheikh was sentenced to a maximum 15 years with a nine-year minimum for the rape and abduction of the 18-year-old on August 30 because, while he had shown no contrition, there was some prospect of rehabilitation, the judge said.

Crown prosecutor Margaret Cunneen had earlier argued that the suppression order should be lifted so that the entire Australian Lebanese community would not remain under a cloud.

With at least five of the gang still at large, she argued publishing the names of the convicted might lead to further arrests.

Judge Finnane said it would be quite wrong for any member of the public to condemn the rapists' families.

This story was found at: http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2002/09/06/1031115938178.html
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom