Upgrading + Armfield & Urquart Debate.

[occy437]

Hey guys I will be upgrading some cash cows in the next few weeks and wanted to know what you thought of this trade. The current players i will be looking to cash in are:

N.Thompson ($271,300)
M.Leuenberger ($229,500)
S.Browne ($246,000)
T.Cotchin ($235,400)
D.Myers ($222,400)
C.Rioli ($375,100)
M.Kreuzer ($210,400)

Now I can see Armfield value getting higher than a few of these players. Especially the $200,000-$250,000 type players. I can get Armfield in the backline or in the midfield. What do you think is my best option.

Option One (My favourite)
Trade Myers out for Armfield

Option Two (Possible unsure on Browne's improvement)
Trade Browne out for Armfield

Option Three (Not going to do, Cotchin still has $$$ to earn)
Trade Cotchin out for Armfield

Can you advise me on whether you think this is a good move or just a waist of a trade.

 

[gwono]

you would be stupidu to do trade 3.

thats all i have to say

 

[Hawkmad]

All three of those options still have growth left in them.
Myers - B/E = 0 Avg. = 64.
Browne - B/E = 38 Avg. = 64
Cotchin - B/E = 3 Avg. = 71

Personally I wouldn't do any of them but if I was forced to choose I would go option 2 he has the least amount to growth left.

 

[occy437]

so the general feeling is that none of these trades have value. My veiw is that if i do this trade this week, then i can upgrade if need be next week with $300,000+ in the bank. I thought Myers was close to maxing out. what does BE stand for as well?

 

[Hawkmad]

so the general feeling is that none of these trades have value. My veiw is that if i do this trade this week, then i can upgrade if need be next week with $300,000+ in the bank. I thought Myers was close to maxing out. what does BE stand for as well?

Break even so Myers has a B/E of 0 all he has to do is score to go up in value.
Browne has a B/E of 38 so if he gets 60 he will go up in price but if he only gets 20 he will go down in price

 

[gwono]

BE = Breakeven = score needed to retain value for next week.

Myers has played what 5 weeks now?

His value is less than Cotchin's 2 price rises cos of his 3 week average being affected by his worst score (29) all 3 price changes, whilst Cotchin's 2 price changes have been affected by a somewhat prettier 62 (still not that great) and a higher average in general.


Cotchin is a fat fat fat cash cow (will be getting nearly Palmer numbers by the end of the year), Myers is not really, neither is Browne.

Keep Cotchin...that's all I will say... again

 

[Hawkmad]

All three of those options still have growth left in them.
Myers - B/E = 0 Avg. = 64.
Browne - B/E = 38 Avg. = 64
Cotchin - B/E = 3 Avg. = 71

Personally I wouldn't do any of them but if I was forced to choose I would go option 2 he has the least amount to growth left.

To help you out a bit more -
If Myers scores his avg of 64 he will go up by $28,200
If Browne scores his avg of 64 he will go up by $11,300
If Cotchin scores his avg of 71 he will go up by $30,100