Remove this Banner Ad

NWO/Illuminati US politics - Pt 6

  • Thread starter Thread starter Werewolf
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

If the relevant authorities kept womens sport fair it wouldn't have happened.
Had the girl known she was fighting a male she may not have taken a step onto the arena.
Going a step further if males are allowed to compete in female sports, may as well just scrap female sport all together.
Do you think lesbians ever get aroused when wrestling other women? Should they screen for gays in sports?
 
You’re conflating a number of different things here.

Sexual assault isn’t a transgender specific activity, most people who commit sexual assault are not transgender. So you mentioning this one specifically seems a bit like trying to weaponise it against trans people whilst ignoring the overwhelming majority of sexual assault isn’t committed by trans people.

‘Men’ aren’t allowed to compete in women’s sports. In some sports, at some levels, transgender athletes may be able to compete. I can’t speak to any such regulations in this specific case of course, but these often come with restrictions on those athletes in the form of hormone levels and time since transition.

I doubt the right wing media bothers to spend much time on the discussions around the limitations or restrictions, but fortunately - as I’ve mentioned multiple times already - for those with a genuine interest in informing themselves the thread on the SRP board has a poster who’s done actual research in the space.

Here’s a pubmed link for some of their work:


Its not about hating on trans people.

Its about protecting girls/women.

The EU just voted for 'trans women' are women into the official womens rights docs for the UN.

How is that improving womens rights?
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Its not about hating on trans people.

Its about protecting girls/women.

The EU just voted for 'trans women' are women into the official womens rights docs for the UN.

How is that improving womens rights?

How is it worsening women’s rights? Seems to me you’re treating it as though trans people not being actively discriminated against means women are disadvantaged because <reasons>.

There’s no statements about participating in sport that I’m aware of from a quick look at the document so it’s not particularly relevant to what you’ve raised. The entire document itself is about women’s rights and gender equality.

Note gender, not sex. They’re different things.
 
Is that evidence stronger than Royce's Hart post of a second hand account of something from 35 years ago. Everyone here knows that shit doesn’t fly in the real world.
The difference is, my comment was not a "second hand account", it was a well document and widely agreed fact. Would you like a source?

Although I do agree that was an unnecessary comment.
 
I am somewhat concerned by the number of things being posted in here that should be absolutely shocking, that aren't.

Like, biggest news story of the week, biggest news story of the month, biggest news story of the year, biggest of the decade, and barely a ripple.

A feature of corrupt societies is the normalisation of the corruption. No one is shocked, or concerned, or surprised, it's just how things work. Is that happening here?

Is Trump succeeding in normalising corruption?

I mean, Trump getting about $500 million from a guy in the UAE, with known connections to both UAE intelligence and China, and then approving the export of export controlled chips to the UAE. Despite the export controls being intended to stop China getting them, and the almost certainty, these will end up in China.

If Obama had done this, people would have been apoplectic with rage, the congressional hearings would have dragged on for months, there would be talk of betrayal, treason and impeachment. It would have been the biggest story of the year, and probably Obama's presidency.

But, when Trump does it, it's just, Oh, that Trump, what a transactional guy. What can you do?

And we all move on like nothing happened.

It's bizarre.

Worried for Nails though, how much cognitive dissonance can one guy take?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

I am somewhat concerned by the number of things being posted in here that should be absolutely shocking, that aren't.

Like, biggest news story of the week, biggest news story of the month, biggest news story of the year, biggest of the decade, and barely a ripple.

A feature of corrupt societies is the normalisation of the corruption. No one is shocked, or concerned, or surprised, it's just how things work. Is that happening here?

Is Trump succeeding in normalising corruption?

I mean, Trump getting about $500 million from a guy in the UAE, with known connections to both UAE intelligence and China, and then approving the export of export controlled chips to the UAE. Despite the export controls being intended to stop China getting them, and the almost certainty, these will end up in China.

If Obama had done this, people would have been apoplectic with rage, the congressional hearings would have dragged on for months, there would be talk of betrayal, treason and impeachment. It would have been the biggest story of the year, and probably Obama's presidency.

But, when Trump does it, it's just, Oh, that Trump, what a transactional guy. What can you do?

And we all move on like nothing happened.

It's bizarre.

Worried for Nails though, how much cognitive dissonance can one guy take?
So much this :thumbsu:

Absolutely he's succeeded in normalising it, to completely insane levels. With no exaggeration there's at least 1 thing every month that would have ended any other presidency even 10 years ago :drunk:

Not just him either, his enablers and sycophants too. The AG and the Director of the FBI have just been proven (as if there was ever any doubt lol) to have lied in testimony to congress, which is a felony as I understand it. They won't even be removed from their positions, let alone charged with anything. Ditto Lutnick, a cabinet member who was just forced into to admitting to a willing association with a convicted underage sex abuser after lying about that too.

Any wonder the true believers are a bit thin on the ground around here these days, you're on the proverbial hiding to nothing still supporting this bloke.
 
Last edited:
So much this :thumbsu:

Absolutely he's succeeded in normalising it, to completely insane levels. With no exaggeration there's at least 1 thing every month that would have ended any other presidency even 10 years ago :drunk:

Not just him either, his enablers and sycophants too. The AG and the Director of the FBI have just been proven (as if there was any doubt lol) to have lied in testimony to congress, which is a felony as I understand it. They won't even be removed from their positions, let alone charged with anything. Ditto Lutnick, a cabinet member who was just forced into to admitting to a willing association with a convicted underage sex abuser after lying about that too.

Any wonder the true believers are a bit thin on the ground around here these days, you're on the proverbial hiding to nothing still supporting this bloke.
nutlick will claim he didnt lie under oath but in an interview
 
Apparently being a "foreign" looking child in ublic, without ID, is now grounds for detention.

It's lucky Americans have guns to prevent government over reach.


thats who i was thinking about

was it a ham sandwich?
 
Apparently being a "foreign" looking child in ublic, without ID, is now grounds for detention.

It's lucky Americans have guns to prevent government over reach.



He's lucky he wasn't shot, that snack looks threatening
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

One of the “most hated” features in cars could disappear from the road following a bold play by US President Donald Trump.
Start-stop systems are designed to save fuel by temporarily stopping engines when cars come to a halt.

The feature has been a fixture in new models for more than a decade, propelled by government incentives to improve fuel consumption.
 
Apparently being a "foreign" looking child in ublic, without ID, is now grounds for detention.

It's lucky Americans have guns to prevent government over reach.


The brave patriots of ICE like going after kids.

Amalia developed a fever on January 1 that reached as high as 104 degrees Fahrenheit (40 degrees Celsius), started vomiting frequently and struggled to breathe, according to the lawsuit.

She was taken to the hospital on January 18 with extremely low oxygen saturation levels and diagnosed with COVID-19, respiratory syncytial virus, viral bronchitis and pneumonia, according to the lawsuit. She was placed on supplemental oxygen.

Amalia was given a nebulizer and a respiratory medication upon her discharge from the hospital, but these were taken away by detention center staff upon her return, according to the lawsuit. The girl has lost 10% of her body weight and was given nutritional drinks to help her regain it, but these were also confiscated by authorities, according to the lawsuit.

Sick ****s who couldn't care less if detained children in their custody suffer and die, its that simple. Imagine supporting this shit :drunk:
 
I’m still standing by what I said on here nearly two years ago when our great Chief freed me from purgatory

 
A sex offender pardoning


And this is the sort of stuff guys like Nails, FBI etc defend, directly or otherwise.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom