NWO/Illuminati US politics

Who should be POTUS?

  • Total voters
    41

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this ad.

bourbons said:
For you BDSers?

No doubt, thats kinda the point :tearsofjoy:
Click to expand...
Saddest thing about your posting is your desperate attempt to appropriate a meme from 2016
A meme that exposed the irrational hatred of Trump you and your fellow sufferers suffer from to this day
 
bourbons said:
Defending Biden would be "I think he's doing an excellent job" or "He's a great president" or "leave Joe alone, he's alright".
Click to expand...

Like this??

#2,355

Let's also not forget the two dozen or so posts from you labelling anyone daring to criticise Biden as deranged or suffering from BDS eh?

twofinger.gif
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Crankitup said:
Like this??

#2,355

Let's also not forget the two dozen or so posts from you labelling anyone daring to criticise Biden as deranged or suffering from BDS eh?

View attachment 1088152
Click to expand...

Irony not your strong suit I take it? I'll use even more emojis next time lol. Merely skewering a few lines that were applied to Donnie over the journey.

Your inability to decipher the mocking of Trump and his fans from supporting Biden remains unparalleled!
 
60 Yards Out said:
Yep, you’re still focused on the big issues — Hunter Biden.
Click to expand...
Twice you've called DNI Ratcliffe a stooge because you're desperate not to believe he's told the truth. One example being his declassifying documents which showed Hillary and the DNC commissioned and paid for a fake dossier to falsely accuse Trump of being compromised by Russians. Brennon was aware of her planning this in July 2016 and noted this was probably to deflect attention from her emails.

DNI Ratcliffe also told the truth when he said there was no evidence Hunter's laptop was Russian disinformation, when this lie was pushed by the Biden campaign, ignored by the DC media and reported by Politico as Russian disinformation and pushed as Russian disinformation by 50 former intel officers!

Never mind that the laptop contained messages that a psychologist was told of Hunters inappropriate drug and sexual behaviour and abuse of his niece, that Joey did nothing about and Dr Jill should have reported because of her job, drugs and porno movies with very young looking girls, or business dealings of Hunters that traded money for influence, money laundering and tax evasion, and this from POTUS son couldn't compromise him?

Nothing to see here.
 
thenationalpulse.com

Zuckerberg's Election Rigging Group Sends VP to Be Biden's Tech Director. - The National Pulse+

A former Vice President of the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative – which funneled $350,000,000 to the Center for Tech and Civic Life – now serves as Special Assistant to the President and Director of Technology in the Biden White House. The Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL) used the hundreds of...
thenationalpulse.com thenationalpulse.com

A former Vice President of the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative – which funneled $350,000,000 to the Center for Tech and Civic Life – now serves as Special Assistant to the President and Director of Technology in the Biden White House.
 
BlueE said:
Twice you've called DNI Ratcliffe a stooge because you're desperate not to believe he's told the truth. One example being his declassifying documents which showed Hillary and the DNC commissioned and paid for a fake dossier to falsely accuse Trump of being compromised by Russians. Brennon was aware of her planning this in July 2016 and noted this was probably to deflect attention from her emails.

DNI Ratcliffe also told the truth when he said there was no evidence Hunter's laptop was Russian disinformation, when this lie was pushed by the Biden campaign, ignored by the DC media and reported by Politico as Russian disinformation and pushed as Russian disinformation by 50 former intel officers!

Never mind that the laptop contained messages that a psychologist was told of Hunters inappropriate drug and sexual behaviour and abuse of his niece, that Joey did nothing about and Dr Jill should have reported because of her job, drugs and porno movies with very young looking girls, or business dealings of Hunters that traded money for influence, money laundering and tax evasion, and this from POTUS son couldn't compromise him?

Nothing to see here.
Click to expand...
He is, by any reasonable judgement, a Trump stooge. See below.
Of course he would write a report -- selective in its use of information and conveniently redacted for publication, that would say there was no evidence of Trump's ties to Russia. That's what he was put there to do.
This is your problem -- you rely on highly compromised or partisan sources of information, which you plumb for ridiculous levels of unreliable detail, to support the propositions you subscribe to. It was the same with the election fraud rubbish -- a lie that even the ludicrous Sidney Powell has now explicitly given up on.
I know you won't stop doing this, but consider yourself called out for peddling valueless and insupportable bullshit.

www.reuters.com

Trump again nominates Congressman Ratcliffe as his intelligence director

President Donald Trump said on Friday he again was tapping Republican Representative John Ratcliffe to be the nation's top spy, a loyalist whose first nomination he dropped last year amid questions about a lack of experience and possible resume embellishment.
www.reuters.com www.reuters.com

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/na...minate-john-ratcliffe-be-intel-chief-n1145621
WASHINGTON — In what amounts to a direct challenge to Senate Republicans, President Donald Trump announced Friday that his pick to head the intelligence community is the same Republican congressman whose previous bid for the job collapsed amid revelations he misrepresented his background.
www.wired.com

Trump's New Intelligence Chief Spells Trouble

John Ratcliffe is the least-qualified director of national intelligence in history—and a staunch partisan as well.
www.wired.com www.wired.com

www.theatlantic.com

The First Nomination as Tragedy, the Second as Farce

John Ratcliffe’s nomination exposes a Senate majority that has ceded its powers to Trump.
www.theatlantic.com www.theatlantic.com
Trump announced plans to nominate Ratcliffe to the post last summer, then withdrew him, after it became clear that Ratcliffe had practically no qualifications for the job, and those he did have were badly misrepresented.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/28/us/politics/john-ratcliffe-director-national-intelligence.html
WASHINGTON — President Trump announced on Friday that he intended to nominate Representative John Ratcliffe, Republican of Texas, as his director of national intelligence, choosing someone he considered last summer before senior Republicans in Congress deemed him unqualified for the job.
 
Last edited:
60 Yards Out said:
He is, by any reasonable judgement, a Trump stooge. See below.
Of course he would write a report -- selective in its use of information and conveniently redacted for publication, that would say there was no evidence of Trump's ties to Russia. That's what he was put there to do.
This is your problem -- you rely on highly compromised or partisan sources of information, which you plumb for ridiculous levels of unreliable detail, to support the propositions you subscribe to. It was the same with the election fraud rubbish -- a lie that even the ludicrous Sidney Powell has now explicitly given up on.
I know you won't stop doing this, but consider yourself called out for peddling valueless and insupportable bullshit.

www.reuters.com

Trump again nominates Congressman Ratcliffe as his intelligence director

President Donald Trump said on Friday he again was tapping Republican Representative John Ratcliffe to be the nation's top spy, a loyalist whose first nomination he dropped last year amid questions about a lack of experience and possible resume embellishment.
www.reuters.com www.reuters.com

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/na...minate-john-ratcliffe-be-intel-chief-n1145621
WASHINGTON — In what amounts to a direct challenge to Senate Republicans, President Donald Trump announced Friday that his pick to head the intelligence community is the same Republican congressman whose previous bid for the job collapsed amid revelations he misrepresented his background.
www.wired.com

Trump's New Intelligence Chief Spells Trouble

John Ratcliffe is the least-qualified director of national intelligence in history—and a staunch partisan as well.
www.wired.com www.wired.com

www.theatlantic.com

The First Nomination as Tragedy, the Second as Farce

John Ratcliffe’s nomination exposes a Senate majority that has ceded its powers to Trump.
www.theatlantic.com www.theatlantic.com
Trump announced plans to nominate Ratcliffe to the post last summer, then withdrew him, after it became clear that Ratcliffe had practically no qualifications for the job, and those he did have were badly misrepresented.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/28/us/politics/john-ratcliffe-director-national-intelligence.html
WASHINGTON — President Trump announced on Friday that he intended to nominate Representative John Ratcliffe, Republican of Texas, as his director of national intelligence, choosing someone he considered last summer before senior Republicans in Congress deemed him unqualified for the job.
Click to expand...
Reasonable judgment? The complaint is Ratcliffe was a member of the House intelligence and judiciary committees, was an outspoken defender of the president during the Democratic-led proceedings that resulted in Trump’s impeachment last year on charges of abuse of power and obstruction of Congress

SO he got to see all the evidence and declassified some of it, which supported what he said and vindicated Trump. You and others that rely on interpretative or imaginative analysis of a few sentences that Meuller said, then ignore the original documents or those that have seen all of them and other Senate reports.

Instead you attack the messenger like Reuters and other propaganda machines involved in Nancy Pant's wrap smears.

No mention of Adam Schiff lying to congress, pretending to read a phone transcript from Trump but was made up and what about Intelligence committee member Swawell having an affair with a Chinese spy or Feinstein have a Chinese spy working for her for 20 years? Where's the outrage there?
 
BlueE said:
thenationalpulse.com

Zuckerberg's Election Rigging Group Sends VP to Be Biden's Tech Director. - The National Pulse+

A former Vice President of the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative – which funneled $350,000,000 to the Center for Tech and Civic Life – now serves as Special Assistant to the President and Director of Technology in the Biden White House. The Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL) used the hundreds of...
thenationalpulse.com thenationalpulse.com

A former Vice President of the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative – which funneled $350,000,000 to the Center for Tech and Civic Life – now serves as Special Assistant to the President and Director of Technology in the Biden White House.
Click to expand...
And the SRP trolls in here believe that Big Tech wasn’t deliberately funnelling money to rig the election for Biden. They’re not stupid so obviously the trolls are here to stir up traffic as the Big C has banned most of us from SRP.
 
WA ROO said:
Yes since 2016
Click to expand...

I suspect you've been irrational for a lot longer than that, but good to get absolute confirmation in the wake of Donnie's loss :thumbsu:

WA ROO said:
Who posted that?
Click to expand...

Yep, I'm sure people are saying Biden is too senile to do a press conference without pre-approved questions coz they think he's really fit for office.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top