- Joined
- Mar 16, 2003
- Posts
- 3,847
- Reaction score
- 1,687
- Location
- Melbourne
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Philadelphia Eagles
For yrs now, i have been a huge plough fan, ever since one mcg friday night game where we got blown away by the free running doggies in a blitzing last quarter... at the time i thought wow, this guy has got them primed. As silly as it sounds if i had a pick of any coach I still think id go plough over matthews, sheeds etc.
BUT
Im fast losing any respect i had for the guy, hes totally contradicting what hes continually stated in the lead up to the race to sign him. Has clearly said on numerous occassions he wants stability off field, weve given him that with ******** schwabby and casey calling a truce and both giving plough their endorsement. Hawthorn are still bickering with scott, (we love u Don!)
even taking into account our big finacial loss this season and us cutting our salary cap expenditure, we seem to have a lotmore room to maneuvere than hawthorn: richo going onto veterans list, we already had 400k+ ready to spend on soloman last season, which is still there, finished paying hollands contract, kellaway and rogers retiring, and several middle tier players out of contract and undoubtably being dumped, not to mention gas will either take a pay cut or get traded... whereas the hawks are paying dutchy close to 600k, nuff said...
the fact is richmond has a much bigger supporter base than hawthorn, our potential to turn it around finacially is almost as big as collingwoods and essendons, which would happen if we got some onfield success, not to mention he would become a footy immortal if he turned this rabble around..
maybe Im biased but our list looks a little better too, definitely in terms of youth we seem to have the jump on the hawks
for the first time ever that I can recall, richmond and its coach have parted ways amicably without bloodshed, and even more surprisingly the board: long the source of all our woes, have for the first time put aside their own agendas in the interests of the club and landing the best possible coach, but still this doesnt seem to be enough.. why?
either our club is perceived in a much darker light than we dared to dread in the football industry or plough is just a hypocrite, and will listen to the heart and not the "process" he keeps rambling on abt, either way, the spirit of this footy club is lower than I could have ever imagined. I cant remember feeling so flat abt the tigers
sorry for the rant..
BUT
Im fast losing any respect i had for the guy, hes totally contradicting what hes continually stated in the lead up to the race to sign him. Has clearly said on numerous occassions he wants stability off field, weve given him that with ******** schwabby and casey calling a truce and both giving plough their endorsement. Hawthorn are still bickering with scott, (we love u Don!)
even taking into account our big finacial loss this season and us cutting our salary cap expenditure, we seem to have a lotmore room to maneuvere than hawthorn: richo going onto veterans list, we already had 400k+ ready to spend on soloman last season, which is still there, finished paying hollands contract, kellaway and rogers retiring, and several middle tier players out of contract and undoubtably being dumped, not to mention gas will either take a pay cut or get traded... whereas the hawks are paying dutchy close to 600k, nuff said...
the fact is richmond has a much bigger supporter base than hawthorn, our potential to turn it around finacially is almost as big as collingwoods and essendons, which would happen if we got some onfield success, not to mention he would become a footy immortal if he turned this rabble around..
maybe Im biased but our list looks a little better too, definitely in terms of youth we seem to have the jump on the hawks
for the first time ever that I can recall, richmond and its coach have parted ways amicably without bloodshed, and even more surprisingly the board: long the source of all our woes, have for the first time put aside their own agendas in the interests of the club and landing the best possible coach, but still this doesnt seem to be enough.. why?
either our club is perceived in a much darker light than we dared to dread in the football industry or plough is just a hypocrite, and will listen to the heart and not the "process" he keeps rambling on abt, either way, the spirit of this footy club is lower than I could have ever imagined. I cant remember feeling so flat abt the tigers
sorry for the rant..








