Votes vs Brissy

[Tarkyn_24]

Mine, even though no one cares;

10 Tarkyn Lockyer - 32 disposals, 18 marks
8 Scott Pendlebury
8 Josh Fraser
7 Ben Johnson
6 Dale Thomas - good in defence

 

[Ekulman]

Cloke?

 

[Tarkyn_24]

Cloke?

Rated him equal with Thomas. Same with Harry O.

Both unlucky to miss out

 

[Lonie_from_50]

9 - Tarkyn Lockyer
8 - Scott Pendlebury
8 - Travis Cloke
8 - Scott Burns
7 - Ben Johnson

 

[The_Analyst]

Mine, even though no one cares;

10 Tarkyn Lockyer - 32 disposals, 18 marks
8 Scott Pendlebury
8 Josh Fraser
7 Ben Johnson
6 Dale Thomas - good in defence

I do care...... just not alot!

 

[Tarkyn_24]

I do care...... just not alot!

Haha

 

[david_345]

Mine, even though no one cares;

10 Tarkyn Lockyer - 32 disposals, 18 marks
8 Scott Pendlebury
8 Josh Fraser
7 Ben Johnson
6 Dale Thomas - good in defence

I'd probably put O'Bree and Burns in before Pendles. And then possibly Cloke.

 

[Tarkyn_24]

nah. O Bree played shite in the second half, Burns, was good but not a standout

 

[DeZi]

10 - Lockyer
8 - Burns
8 - Cloke
7 - Johnson
6 - O'Bree

I would probably add pendles as same as o'bree

 

[Coin_Toss]

9. Tarkyn Lockyer
8. Scott Pendlebury
8. Travis Cloke
7. Simon Prestigiacomo (the quiet achiever)
7. Ben Johnson

I'd like to give a polish to Guy Richards. He was probably our most influential ruckman out there and ran harder than ever before around the ground.

There's a competitive edge for spots now, nobody's a certainty, and Chris Bryan will need to earn his spot back through the reserves.

 

[sloth6]

I'd probably put O'Bree and Burns in before Pendles. And then possibly Cloke.

Seriously, was I watching a different game!

O'Bree, that last quarter goal got him a game next week. He was useless.

Pendles was that good it wasn't funny! Get on Tarks for the Brownlow. Guy Richards actually stood up tonight and was good, whilst Travis Cloke was terrific up forward.

 

[Tarkyn_24]

Seriously, was I watching a different game!

O'Bree, that last quarter goal got him a game next week. He was useless.

Pendles was that good it wasn't funny! Get on Tarks for the Brownlow. Guy Richards actually stood up tonight and was good, whilst Travis Cloke was terrific up forward.

For a sec, i thought u were tlaking to me.

BTW, David345, i think you were mentioned in Inside Football. Not sure though.

 

[david_345]

BTW, David345, i think you were mentioned in Inside Football. Not sure though.

Huh? What did they say?

Seriously, was I watching a different game!

O'Bree, that last quarter goal got him a game next week. He was useless.

I might be over-rating him but didn't he get around 25 possessions? He was everywhere in the 1st half, had a quiet 3rd and had a decent 4th.

 

[Tarkyn_24]

I think it was one of your posts on here.

I'm not sure, I remember flicking through it in the newsagency while I was on my break from work. I remember there was one of Ted Ed Fred's posts on the Hawks game, but I can't remember what yours??? was about.

Might be worth checking out anyway.

In the Cyber Talk column or something

 

[Jabso]

9. T.Lockyer
7. B.Johnson
7. S.Prestigiacomo
7. S.O'Bree
7. T.Cloke

VERY UNLUCKY: Pendlebury

 

[Tarkyn_24]

Huh? What did they say?
I might be over-rating him but didn't he get around 25 possessions? He was everywhere in the 1st half, had a quiet 3rd and had a decent 4th.

20. 8 in the second half I think.

 

[Jabso]

O'Bree was good I felt. Just shaded Burns IMO due to his attacking impact, and was better in sharking the ball and around the clearences.

 

[david_345]

Might be worth checking out anyway.

Will do, thanks for that.

 

[AJ_No.4]

9. T Cloke
9. T Lockyer
8. S Pendlebury
7. A Rocca
7 S Burns

I can't understand how people miss out Rocca???
How many times did this bloke provide the lead out of full forward to CHF, how many goals were off his crumbs id say at elast 5 maybe more.

God does anyone actually watch the game or just read the stat sheet.

 

[Tarkyn_24]

9. T Cloke
9. T Lockyer
8. S Pendlebury
7. A Rocca
7 S Burns

I can't understand how people miss out Rocca???
How many times did this bloke provide the lead out of full forward to CHF, how many goals were off his crumbs id say at elast 5 maybe more.

God does anyone actually watch the game or just read the stat sheet.

Erm... I listened to it. Does that count???

 

[jerry springer]

Erm... I listened to it. Does that count???

no,because you are influenced by the callers

 

[Tarkyn_24]

no,because you are influenced by the callers

well its f***** hard to do anything else about when ur in Perth, at work, and its not on TV.

But my impressions were above.

^Comments above weren't about you, just quoted your message accidentally.

 

[Jabso]

Hey you know who wasn't crap. Richards, I thought he was ok, he looked like he had a bit of confidence and I won't be dropping him for Bryan. Charman had a stack of hitouts but didn't do much with it IMO, most of the hitouts went our way, most of their clearences weren't through great hitouts, just good sharking.

 

[Tarkyn_24]

Hey you know who wasn't crap. Richards, I thought he was ok, he looked like he had a bit of confidence and I won't be dropping him for Bryan. Charman had a stack of hitouts but didn't do much with it IMO, most of the hitouts went our way, most of their clearences weren't through great hitouts, just good sharking.

Haha. Love the way you delivered that jabso.

 

[AJ_No.4]

Hey you know who wasn't crap. Richards, I thought he was ok, he looked like he had a bit of confidence and I won't be dropping him for Bryan. Charman had a stack of hitouts but didn't do much with it IMO, most of the hitouts went our way, most of their clearences weren't through great hitouts, just good sharking.

I agree Richards was pretty good and has learnt to hand ball as much as possible as he usually makes crap decisions and poor kicks.

Id say keep him in.