Remove this Banner Ad

WAFL Table 2001

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

I dont have the figures off hand, but I think it went something like:

East Perth
Claremont
South Fremantle
Subiaco
----------------
West Perth
Perth
Peel
East Fremantle
Swan Districts
 
Originally posted by GoEagles
I dont have the figures off hand, but I think it went something like:

East Perth
Claremont
South Fremantle
Subiaco
----------------
West Perth
Perth
Peel
East Fremantle
Swan Districts

Souths before Claremont?
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

2001 Ladder;
Claremont - 60
East Perth - 56
South Fremantle - 52
Subiaco - 38

West Perth - 34
Peel - 28
Perth - 24
East Fremantle - 20
Swans - 12

Full details

Claremont (3)
18 - Played
15 - Won
- Drew
3 - Lost
1792 - For
1248 - Against
143.59 - %
60 - Points

East Perth (1)
18
14
-
4
1719
1372
125.29
56

South Fremantle (2)
18
13
-
5
1725
1201
143.63
52

Subiaco (4)
18
9
1
8
1580
1307
120.89
38

West Perth
18
8
1
9
1503
1566
95.98
34

Peel
18
7
-
11
1417
1990
71.21
28

Perth
18
6
-
12
1170
1428
81.93
24

East Fremantle
18
5
-
13
1495
1797
83.19
20

Swan Districts
18
3
-
15
1283
1775
72.28
12
 
...and then in the Finals, based on the old Final Four system, South knocked out Subiaco in the first week, then East Perth upset minor premiers Claremont to go straight to the GF, with Claremont then going out in straight sets to South, whereupon East Perth thrashed South in a terrible GF (South had Clucas suspended and Mott injured before the game and lost Atkins in the second quarter - after which it was under 12s versus men).
 
I was fairly close. You can do a letter for the end of the round robin matches or the ladder after all finals have been completed. I totally forgot how much Claremont choked in the finals!! Peel did better than I thought too.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

WAFL Table 2001

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top