We will win without Rocca

[Joel]

Originally posted by Moo://_Cow
I stopped reading this thread at that point, Fraser is usually your number 1 ruckman who gets some help from Rocca, correct? WIthout Rocca there Fraser is going to go up against Keating and Charman for the whole day unless you bring someone like Mckee in who i don't think is going to win that many hit outs. How can you say it doesn't matter who's in the ruck, When Keatings in the ruck there's no clearence to be won, He's already done it.

I say that, because we are better than Brisbane at the clearances, I think Collingwood were number 1, or number 2 in te comp for clearances.

 

[hq56]

Originally posted by Joel
Eh? Wasn't threatening you. You're just pathetic.

that was funny

You gotta hand it to Melbourne people tho, they're helping collingwood... I don't think they had any good players to hand over to collingwood this year, I could be wrong

We've won in Adelaide without Buckley.

 

[bowker]

It will be a good match but the lions will come thru the victors!

 

[thehardaway]

Originally posted by bowker
It will be a good match but the lions will come thru the victors!

Dunno bout the good match part, but the second half was correct

 

[Paralowiepower]

You wouldnt of won with him!

 

[Renegade]

Originally posted by Joel
Stuff the tribunal.

We will win the Grand Final without Rocca.

HAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAH
HELLO JOEL, HOW THE **** ARE YOU???
loser

 

[taff wa]

It wasnt Rocca not playing that killed Collingwood today. Their midfield was brilliant. I thought Akermanis should have won the Normie.

 

[Orangewhip]

I actually considered Rocca overated until the Grand Final defeat. Now I think Collingwood is overated if they were that $hitfull without the overated Rocca.


ROOOOOOC-OOOOOOH-NO.