Pets When animals attack.

[little graham]

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/...ce-outside-court/story-fni6uo1m-1226922523222

In the story is video of a guy and his woman leaving court being harassed by a media pack(some would call pack of dogs). The camerman is blocking the womans path so the guy hits him and they both (guy and his woman) continue trying to walk away. Another journo appears to assault the guy as he leaves and the camerman comes back for some more, clearly not perturbed by events moments before.

The guy was arrested and locked up, but what about the journalist who used his microphone afterwards in trying to detain the guy? They knew who the guy was, they had the evidence required by police, the guy was leaving the area trying to avoid confrontation, if his woman had not been blocked no assault would of occurred. There simply was no need to chase him. The pack clearly smelt blood. This story trys and paints the journo who chased after and allegedly assaulted the guy with his microphone in a confined space as a victim

Personally I think it was play on, think he shouldn't be charged. The guy was protecting his woman. chivalrous and honorable. Before anyone can say that the guy and his woman had committed crimes and deserve it, maybe you should look at the crimes committed by the company they're accused of stealing from and tell us all how its different?

Media can be perceived as animals with rabbies like symptoms

Second part, how good was the combination from the fat dood? Joe Bugnor eat your heart out.

 

[SwampCreature]

Yes, but how was rabby formed?

 

[BALKAN]

Very hard for me to have any sympathy for journos and paparazzi.
You know that getting into the job that you're a complete dog, so don't be surprised when someone wacks you.

 

[Drakescoffeecake]

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/...ce-outside-court/story-fni6uo1m-1226922523222

In the story is video of a guy and his woman leaving court being harassed by a media pack(some would call pack of dogs). The camerman is blocking the womans path so the guy hits him and they both (guy and his woman) continue trying to walk away. Another journo appears to assault the guy as he leaves and the camerman comes back for some more, clearly not perturbed by events moments before.

The guy was arrested and locked up, but what about the journalist who used his microphone afterwards in trying to detain the guy? They knew who the guy was, they had the evidence required by police, the guy was leaving the area trying to avoid confrontation, if his woman had not been blocked no assault would of occurred. There simply was no need to chase him. The pack clearly smelt blood. This story trys and paints the journo who chased after and allegedly assaulted the guy with his microphone in a confined space as a victim

Personally I think it was play on, think he shouldn't be charged. The guy was protecting his woman. chivalrous and honorable. Before anyone can say that the guy and his woman had committed crimes and deserve it, maybe you should look at the crimes committed by the company they're accused of stealing from and tell us all how its different?

Media can be perceived as animals with rabbies like symptoms

Second part, how good was the combination from the fat dood? Joe Bugnor eat your heart out.

What in the world?!

The cameraman was not blocking the woman's path. He was walking backwards filming the pair as they always do, the dickhead fraudster didn't like the attention so he assaulted the cameraman. Not acceptable, regardless of what you think of the media.

The fact is, the cameraman was doing his job and had a right to be there. That fat shit had no right to lay a hand on the cameraman, or anyone for that matter. Clear as day if you ask me.

Neither here nor there the fact that he was captured after he assaulted someone.

 

[little graham]

What in the world?!

The cameraman was not blocking the woman's path. He was walking backwards filming the pair as they always do, the dickhead fraudster didn't like the attention so he assaulted the cameraman. Not acceptable, regardless of what you think of the media.

The fact is, the cameraman was doing his job and had a right to be there. That fat shit had no right to lay a hand on the cameraman, or anyone for that matter. Clear as day if you ask me.

Neither here nor there the fact that he was captured after he assaulted someone.

She was crying, show some respect and give people space. What about after the initial blow? That were still at them like a mob of jack russel/ shitzu crossses.

 

[Drakescoffeecake]

Give people some space? They're criminals. Who gives a shit? She has to put up with cameras for 20 seconds of her day, boohoo.

Question. If you filmed someone assault your friend in an unprovoked attack, would you chase/follow him?

 

[little graham]

They're criminals. Who gives a shit?

Question. If you filmed someone assault your friend in an unprovoked attack, would you chase/follow him?

Irrelevant because clearly had the camera not been bothering them nothing would of happened. GM have been convicted in courts to you know, so why all the fuss over criminals stealing from criminals? Alot worse crimes as well, than what these two are charged with.

 

[Drakescoffeecake]

That's not the point. This guy committed assault and I'm not sure how you can defend it. A dog act by this feral.

 

[little graham]

That's not the point.

You're the one who brought it up. If we're suppose to not care about their rights because they're allegedly criminals ,then we're not to care about whatever happens to GM because their illegal activities.

T In the article it mentions what they're charged with but insinuates GM are a law biding company (I suspect someone might think the judicial process has been compromised) That makes the unfair media harassment of these two discriminatory.

Let he who free from sin cast the first stone.

 

[Drakescoffeecake]

You're the one who brought it up. If we're suppose to not care about their rights because they're allegedly criminals ,then we're not to care about whatever happens to GM because their illegal activities.

What rights were the media taking away from them?

 

[little graham]

They're criminals. Who gives a shit?

Again, why should we care about what is stolen from GM , considering Gm's record?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Motors_streetcar_conspiracy

This is just one of many examples of the scrouples of GM, so why should we care about what happens to them?

 

[Drakescoffeecake]

So this is about GM now? What's one thing got to do with the other? You're a little all over the place... You're defending assault of the media because they filmed someone who stole from someone who you think are criminals themselves...?

 

[little graham]

who you think are criminals themselves...?

Alot of courts have found them guilty.

You made the point that the two here are criminals and i agree with you no one should give a shit the way their tret because of their alleged behavior. So whats the difference, why should we care about GM?

The cameran did not need to be where he was, it says it all they he continued to try and get 'that shot' after he had been assaulted.

 

[little graham]

U.S. safety regulators fined General Motors a record $35 million Friday for taking at least a decade to disclose defects with ignition switches in small cars that are now linked to at least 13 deaths.

http://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory/government-make-announcement-gm-probe-23745686

Whats a 6.0 liter compared to thirteen lives?

Whats a bit of money laundering compared to covering up 13 deaths?

This dude was up in court within a week of this conviction against GM, where's the fuss from adelaides press over that?

 

[BALKAN]

If I stuck a giant camera in the face of people who were obviously a bit distraught, I wouldn't be so pigheaded to get surprised when they lash out. Hopefully common sense prevails and he gets off scot free.

 

[Sydney Bloods]

usually I'd be against that muppet, but as it was against a glorified paparazzi scum, i say carry on, they are the definition of oxygen thieves.

is their actually a more despicable career path then professionally stalking people?