davidsonsyear05
Rookie
- Oct 3, 2004
- 21
- 0
- Other Teams
- Collingwood
who out of these blokes?
Lonie, Richards, Tex, Didak, Davis, Maxwell
Lonie, Richards, Tex, Didak, Davis, Maxwell
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
i 2nd thatjabso said:Lonie: Not too sure about him. At best I hope he solidifies his place in the 22 because his skills are a huge asset. However I have doubts about his potential to be a top liner.
Richards: Not much has been said about this but we have pretty poor ruck depth (Richards and Fraser are the only 2 bonafide ruckman on the full list excluding rookies). Richards should pick up where he left off last year. He is a very important player to us this season. It's good to hear that Fanning is going alright in training so if we have a few out he could step up for a few games. I don't really see that Richards should bulk up massively, if you look at M.Clarke he is strong enough to win hitouts but doesn't look massive and Guy looks like he has the same frame as him.
Tex: Eddiesmiths favorite player. I am a big fan of him (legitamately) and I think he should get alot of game time in the backline and get a few big jobs. Should start the grooming for CHB phase now.
Didak: We saw in 04 when he was in the midfield he was very damaging. Give him more time in the midfield next season and he should blossom. It's hard for a young player too look good consistantly in the forward pocket. His creativity and vision, great skills, strong marking, evasiveness should come in handy next year. I think he will take the biggest step up this year.
Davis: IMO too old to categorise as a youngster. I reckon give him more time in the midfield for "bursts" to shake things up. If he has another so so season at forward pocket, it's time to look at him and wonder if we are better off giving his spot to a younger player.
Maxwell: Give him game time and he should be a long term member of the senior 22. He adds versatility to the backline. He is in the Clement mould in that he can cover talls and smalls (as long as their not gorillas) but he is a smaller (and less strong) quicker version of him (perhaps without the pinpoint disposal too). Has a great footy brain.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
jabso said:If he does what he did during a portion of 2003 consistantly I would be thrilled.
Yes.Stan. said:I think we should put fraser on the market at the end of the year.
With richards and maybe fanning coming on we might be covered for rucking positions in the future.
We might get a high pick or a decent young midfielder in exchange.
Anyone agree.
twaters said:Too early to offload Fraser; got a season to play.
Yeah Taz would occasionally kick 4 goals in 1 game.. then die off in the next, he needs to be consistant this year and kick 5 goals a game with Rocca by his side kicking at least 3 goals a game!.hotpie said:Agree, Fraser, Didak and Taz need to make the next step, especially the first two. Taz just needs to kick more goals (has he ever kicked more than 6 in a game - I can only remember it once!!!)
Of the younger players, Its C Cloke, Walker, Richards and B Shaw that we need to see progress from. Also King. Nobody at Collingwood's a big wrap for him, myself included, but I'd love to see him prove us all wrong. He's got a bit of showbiz about him, he could become a dangerous player to match if he applies himself.