Remove this Banner Ad

Why?????????????????

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Better still - the WACA without Aussie Rules .

.

And the Sydney Swans were such a driving force behind ANZ stadium weren't they?

Oh, lets not forget that the Gabba is where it is at the moment because of the BL.
 
And the Sydney Swans were such a driving force behind ANZ stadium weren't they?

Oh, lets not forget that the Gabba is where it is at the moment because of the BL.


Yes , some good points there .

The SCG has gone ahead since the Swans have arrived .

The Gabba has really gone ahead since the Lions arrived .

Homebush is helped a lot by the AFL and with the introduction of GWS there is an even greater chance that Homebush will get out of the doldrums .
:cool:




.
 
Yes , some good points there .

The SCG has gone ahead since the Swans have arrived .

The Gabba has really gone ahead since the Lions arrived .

Homebush is helped a lot by the AFL and with the introduction of GWS there is an even greater chance that Homebush will get out of the doldrums .
:cool:




.

Homebush in the doldrums? My god you are delusional. As much as it pains me to say, it is a better stadium then the G. I have been to both. Although atmosphere wise, the G is better. Technically speaking, ANZ is Australia's #1 stadium.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

The 'Gabba is now a full multi-tier grandstand covered 42k stadium thanks to the Lions/AFL. Before the Lions arrived it was just small ground with a dogtrack around it.

Nice try. All of the record crowds at the Gabba are for cricket internationals. The ground was upgraded with Cricket as the main tenant, with the Lions as an afterthought. Just aswell too, with the Lions averaging crowds of 28,000 or so over the last couple of seasons. The GABBA operators better watch out, they might have Barkly St End jumping down their neck because AFL crowds aren't filling the stadium.
 
Nice try. All of the record crowds at the Gabba are for cricket internationals. The ground was upgraded with Cricket as the main tenant, with the Lions as an afterthought. Just aswell too, with the Lions averaging crowds of 28,000 or so over the last couple of seasons. The GABBA operators better watch out, they might have Barkly St End jumping down their neck because AFL crowds aren't filling the stadium.

Here we go again, same argument, different thread.
 
Nice try. All of the record crowds at the Gabba are for cricket internationals. The ground was upgraded with Cricket as the main tenant, with the Lions as an afterthought. Just aswell too, with the Lions averaging crowds of 28,000 or so over the last couple of seasons. The GABBA operators better watch out, they might have Barkly St End jumping down their neck because AFL crowds aren't filling the stadium.

Well at least they weren't banking on the 2400 who roll up for GC soccer games .

.
 
Nice try. All of the record crowds at the Gabba are for cricket internationals. The ground was upgraded with Cricket as the main tenant, with the Lions as an afterthought. Just aswell too, with the Lions averaging crowds of 28,000 or so over the last couple of seasons. The GABBA operators better watch out, they might have Barkly St End jumping down their neck because AFL crowds aren't filling the stadium.

AFL easily brings more numbers to the Gabba than cricket on an aggregate basis over 12 months.... even though the Gabba is in a "non AFL state"! Your info re cricket/AFL and the Gabba is highly questionable.
 
Nice try. All of the record crowds at the Gabba are for cricket internationals. The ground was upgraded with Cricket as the main tenant, with the Lions as an afterthought. Just aswell too, with the Lions averaging crowds of 28,000 or so over the last couple of seasons. The GABBA operators better watch out, they might have Barkly St End jumping down their neck because AFL crowds aren't filling the stadium.
Absolute rubbish. International Cricket had been played since 1961 and nothing changed until the Lions moved there in the early 90s. The dogtrack was removed to make size of the ground suitable for AFL and the grandstands were added to accommodate the increasing numbers to Lions' games in their glory years 2001-4.

If you want to talk about falling crowds in Brisbane the Roar's is nosediving bigtime. Average has halved to just 8,000 in the past 2 years. Yeah sure soccer is going to be the No. 1 sport :rolleyes:.
 
Absolute rubbish. International Cricket had been played since 1961 and nothing changed until the Lions moved there in the early 90s. The dogtrack was removed to make size of the ground suitable for AFL and the grandstands were added to accommodate the increasing numbers to Lions' games in their glory years 2001-4.

If you want to talk about falling crowds in Brisbane the Roar's is nosediving bigtime. Average has halved to just 8,000 in the past 2 years. Yeah sure soccer is going to be the No. 1 sport :rolleyes:.

Yeah, with average crowds of 13,000 in 1993, the GABBA was expanded for the sake of the Lions. http://www.footywire.com/afl/footy/ta-brisbane-lions

GABBA was expanded for international cricket, with the Lions as an afterthought.
 
Nice try. All of the record crowds at the Gabba are for cricket internationals. The ground was upgraded with Cricket as the main tenant, with the Lions as an afterthought. Just aswell too, with the Lions averaging crowds of 28,000 or so over the last couple of seasons. The GABBA operators better watch out, they might have Barkly St End jumping down their neck because AFL crowds aren't filling the stadium.

Lords has a capacity of 20,000.

Whereever the AFL plays on a cricket ground in Australia, the capacity is far more than that.
 
Average Crowd figures in 1993 (Lions first full year at the 'Gabba) plus this past decade

.......Lions Broncos Roar
1993 11149 43200

2000 27406 21239
2001 27638 19710
2002 26895 20131
2003 31717 24326
2004 33619 28667
2005 33267 30331 14,785
2006 28630 31208 16,465
2007 28848 32868 16,951
2008 28128 33426 12,995
2009 29172 34587 8,819

Pick the sport that's struggling in Brisbane :rolleyes:


Sources:
http://stats.rleague.com/afl/afl_index.html
http://stats.rleague.com/rl/rl_index.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A-League
 
Yeah, with average crowds of 13,000 in 1993, the GABBA was expanded for the sake of the Lions. http://www.footywire.com/afl/footy/ta-brisbane-lions

GABBA was expanded for international cricket, with the Lions as an afterthought.
So the new stands were added prior to 1993 were they? :rolleyes:

http://www.msfa.qld.gov.au/content/venue.asp?name=Gabba_History

The Redevelopment

From November 1974 until early 1993, there were very few improvements at the Gabba. The 1993 Master Plan set out a 15 year plan to completely redevelop the Gabba.

Stage 1 saw the removal of the greyhound track and reconfiguration of the playing field to the same dimensions as the MCG.

Stage 2 (construction of the temporary Western Stand, installation of terrace seating and provision of corporate suites and boxes) was completed by Easter 1993, when the Brisbane Bears played their first match at the Gabba as permanent tenants.

Stage 3 (Northern Stand, lights for night sport and new scoreboards) was completed by the end of 1995.

Stage 4 consists of Eastern Stand and 5 bays of the Western Stand. The Eastern Stand opened on 27 March 1999 bringing capacity to 23,000 and the 5 bay Western Stand opened on 1 May 1999, bringing capacity to over 26,000.

Stage 5 (the 15 bay Southern Stand) was completed in December 1999, bringing ground capacity to 37,600.

The playing field was totally replaced with a USGA sand profile stabilised turf field in a 12 week period after the One Day International cricket matches in January 2000.

Stage 6 has seen the replacement of the Brisbane Lions Social Club with a new $40 million fully seated grandstand increasing The Gabba's capacity to 42,000. Stage 6 'the final link' was opened by Premier Peter Beattie on 25 September 2005.

The dimensions of the playing field are 170.6 metres (east-west) by 149.9 metres (north-south) when measured fence-to-fence. The Gabba is slightly larger than the MCG, which is 172.9m by 147.3m.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Average Crowd figures in 1993 (Lions first full year at the 'Gabba) plus this past decade

.......Lions Broncos Roar
1993 11149 43200

2000 27406 21239
2001 27638 19710
2002 26895 20131
2003 31717 24326
2004 33619 28667
2005 33267 30331 14,785
2006 28630 31208 16,465
2007 28848 32868 16,951
2008 28128 33426 12,995
2009 29172 34587 8,819

Pick the sport that's struggling in Brisbane :rolleyes:

Excuse me? Since when did the Lions start playing at the Gabba in 93? It was the Bears back then. I notice that you didn't include the figures from 93-99 - instead choosing to tally from the year before Brisbane won it's first premiership.

Talk about weighting the data to suit your argument.
 
So the new stands were added prior to 1993 were they? :rolleyes:

http://www.msfa.qld.gov.au/content/venue.asp?name=Gabba_History

The Redevelopment

From November 1974 until early 1993, there were very few improvements at the Gabba. The 1993 Master Plan set out a 15 year plan to completely redevelop the Gabba.

Stage 1 saw the removal of the greyhound track and reconfiguration of the playing field to the same dimensions as the MCG.

Stage 2 (construction of the temporary Western Stand, installation of terrace seating and provision of corporate suites and boxes) was completed by Easter 1993, when the Brisbane Bears played their first match at the Gabba as permanent tenants.

Stage 3 (Northern Stand, lights for night sport and new scoreboards) was completed by the end of 1995.

Stage 4 consists of Eastern Stand and 5 bays of the Western Stand. The Eastern Stand opened on 27 March 1999 bringing capacity to 23,000 and the 5 bay Western Stand opened on 1 May 1999, bringing capacity to over 26,000.

Stage 5 (the 15 bay Southern Stand) was completed in December 1999, bringing ground capacity to 37,600.

The playing field was totally replaced with a USGA sand profile stabilised turf field in a 12 week period after the One Day International cricket matches in January 2000.

Stage 6 has seen the replacement of the Brisbane Lions Social Club with a new $40 million fully seated grandstand increasing The Gabba's capacity to 42,000. Stage 6 'the final link' was opened by Premier Peter Beattie on 25 September 2005.

The dimensions of the playing field are 170.6 metres (east-west) by 149.9 metres (north-south) when measured fence-to-fence. The Gabba is slightly larger than the MCG, which is 172.9m by 147.3m.

I think that is how grounds should be done. Slow and steady, incremental changes. But that takes time.
 
Excuse me? Since when did the Lions start playing at the Gabba in 93? It was the Bears back then. I notice that you didn't include the figures from 93-99 - instead choosing to tally from the year before Brisbane won it's first premiership.

Talk about weighting the data to suit your argument.
LOL talk about clutching at straws!

Lions/Bears = semantics in this argument.

So crowds went from 11k in 1993 to 27k in 2000. Geez Einstein I wonder what happened to Brisbane crowds in the 7 years in between :rolleyes:

....... Bears ... happy now!
1993 11149
1994 12434
1995 10305
1996 18088

.......Lions
1997 19550
1998 16675
1999 21890
2000 27406

The trend was heading up well before their flag years.
 
Brisbane Roar, or any A League taem, aren't comparable to AFL teams in crowd figures, as the A League is not an elite competition. Fans pay to see the best players - a more accurate comparison would be A league vs the 25th best AFL competition. And we all know who wins there crowd wise.
 
LOL talk about clutching at straws!

Lions/Bears = semantics in this argument.

So crowds went from 11k in 1993 to 27k in 2000. Geez Einstein I wonder what happened to Brisbane crowds in the 7 years in between :rolleyes:

....... Bears ... happy now!
1993 11149
1994 12434
1995 10305
1996 18088

.......Lions
1997 19550
1998 16675
1999 21890
2000 27406

The trend was heading up well before their flag years.

So what you're telling us is that from their inception in 87, the Bears could only average the same sort of crowd that the Roar has averaged in their first five seasons (in fact the Roar have a higher average, even including this season attendance). And yet with a little success, bought by the AFL and their assistance to the Lions, the numbers magically pick up.

Just wanted to clear that up.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Brisbane Roar, or any A League taem, aren't comparable to AFL teams in crowd figures, as the A League is not an elite competition. Fans pay to see the best players - a more accurate comparison would be A league vs the 25th best AFL competition. And we all know who wins there crowd wise.

So WTF are you doing ? Arguing for the sake of arguing and ticking offg everybody in the process . Finally you've admitted soccer is nothing in Australia when compared to the contact codes .

.
 
Brisbane Roar, or any A League taem, aren't comparable to AFL teams in crowd figures, as the A League is not an elite competition. Fans pay to see the best players - a more accurate comparison would be A league vs the 25th best AFL competition. And we all know who wins there crowd wise.
dudette, the point is this: there is not one stadium in australia that meets fifa's arseholian demands that is maintained for soccer. stadiums that have 40k plus capacity, year in, year out, are for other sports. if fifa/ ffa want the stoopido world cup here then pay the band leader. otherwise piss off. if fifa interupt my cats for even a second, then i want them to write a cheque. fair?
 
dudette, the point is this: there is not one stadium in australia that meets fifa's arseholian demands that is maintained for soccer. stadiums that have 40k plus capacity, year in, year out, are for other sports. if fifa/ ffa want the stoopido world cup here then pay the band leader. otherwise piss off. if fifa interupt my cats for even a second, then i want them to write a cheque. fair?

Incorrect. ANZ Stadium, MCG, SFS and Suncorp stadium are currently up to FIFA standards already, without any modification.
 
So what you're telling us is that from their inception in 87, the Bears could only average the same sort of crowd that the Roar has averaged in their first five seasons (in fact the Roar have a higher average, even including this season attendance). And yet with a little success, bought by the AFL and their assistance to the Lions, the numbers magically pick up.

Just wanted to clear that up.
Prior to this current season the Roar finished 3rd twice in a row and are currently in the top 6 yet their crowd figures have halved. So much for your argument that success and playing finals automatically boosts average crowds eh! :rolleyes:

If there's one thing the Bears were infamous for is that they received no help whatsoever from the then VFL and then AFL. It was a club of discards thrown to the wolves on the Gold Coast which had a far smaller in population than now and they had no facilities.

Btw it's laughable to make out Soccer has just rocked up in the past 5 years like the Bears did in 87. It's not as if there's only been a Brisbane soccer team in the national soccer comp. for the past 5 years. There was the Strikers for 11 years before the Roar and before that the Roar themselves use to be in the old NSL as the Brisbane Lions from 1977-86, 88. All flopped after an initial interest spike. The Roar is showing the same worrying trend. The Bears as bad as they were never had season crowd figures halving. Once they moved to their proper home in Brisbane in 1993 their crowds virtually doubled within 5 years even before the merger with Fitzroy.

The AFL has also always played in winter in direct competition with the NRL season yet crowds went up. Soccer playing in summer doesn't having that major competition to deal with yet crowds are still falling dramatically and not just in Brisbane.

If I was a Soccer administrator I'd be more concerned with the sharp decline in crowd figures across the country than deluding myself with thoughts of becoming Australia's No.1 sport in 30 years time and cheering on bitter morons like Craig Foster rubbishing every other football code and their supporters (stupidly forgetting there are those who love both AFL and Soccer). I remember being told when I was a little kid playing Soccer it would become the No.1 sport in Australia by the time I was in my late-30s. Well I'm 36 now and nothing has changed. Aussie Rules is more popular and wealthier than ever while deluded Soccer-only nuffers who hate AFL are still telling me that in 30 years time Soccer will be the No.1 sport in Australia lol. Soccer officialdom is the sport's own worst enemy. They will eventually kill off the A-league the way they are going just as they did with the NSL. A different name but same Sydney-centric anti-AFL chip on the shoulder.
 
Brisbane Roar, or any A League taem, aren't comparable to AFL teams in crowd figures, as the A League is not an elite competition. Fans pay to see the best players - a more accurate comparison would be A league vs the 25th best AFL competition. And we all know who wins there crowd wise.
What a ridiculous comparison. The Aussie Rules state, metro and country leagues have to compete with the AFL for crowds from the same local fanbase with games on at the same time. The A-league like every national soccer competition worldwide doesn't compete with each other for crowds from the same local fanbase. Whatever code you love you go and watch your club in your country's top league. If Soccer was the most popular sport in Australia then it would've been No.1 long ago. However in terms of crowds, members, sponsors, media rights, tv ratings, radio talkback, etc it is the poorer cousin to AFL and always will be.

Soccer is just a niche sport in Australia but that's nothing to be ashamed of. It is what it is and does well enough to produce elite players to play OS and a decent enough local league if managed well by admins living in reality without an anti-AFL chip on their shoulder. Sadly for the sport the latter is lacking.

Even if we were a pure Soccer nation churning out star after star and winning World Cups our local league would still be sub-par to those in Europe with the $$$ to poach our best players. That still, if we had a Soccer culture, wouldn't have stopped people flocking to games as it doesn't in non-Western European countries around the world where support for Soccer is No.1 despite the poorer quality of the local comp. Australia just doesn't have that Soccer culture. There's overwhelming support for the Socceroos as there always has been but that's more to do with patriotism, our love of sport, and our love of sticking it up everyone by winning against the odds. We're not ignorant philistines. Australians know how big a deal the WC is even if they aren't soccer fans. If it wasn't for the FFA reneging on their promise of not requiring Etihad then we wouldn't have heard boo from Demetriou, the media's focus would be purely on us aiming to host the 2022 WC, and this BF sub-forum probably wouldn't even exist lol.
 
Prior to this current season the Roar finished 3rd twice in a row and are currently in the top 6 yet their crowd figures have halved. So much for your argument that success and playing finals automatically boosts average crowds eh! :rolleyes:

If there's one thing the Bears were infamous for is that they received no help whatsoever from the then VFL and then AFL. It was a club of discards thrown to the wolves on the Gold Coast which had a far smaller in population than now and they had no facilities.

Btw it's laughable to make out Soccer has just rocked up in the past 5 years like the Bears did in 87. It's not as if there's only been a Brisbane soccer team in the national soccer comp. for the past 5 years. There was the Strikers for 11 years before the Roar and before that the Roar themselves use to be in the old NSL as the Brisbane Lions from 1977-86, 88. All flopped after an initial interest spike. The Roar is showing the same worrying trend. The Bears as bad as they were never had season crowd figures halving. Once they moved to their proper home in Brisbane in 1993 their crowds virtually doubled within 5 years even before the merger with Fitzroy.

The AFL has also always played in winter in direct competition with the NRL season yet crowds went up. Soccer playing in summer doesn't having that major competition to deal with yet crowds are still falling dramatically and not just in Brisbane.

If I was a Soccer administrator I'd be more concerned with the sharp decline in crowd figures across the country than deluding myself with thoughts of becoming Australia's No.1 sport in 30 years time and cheering on bitter morons like Craig Foster rubbishing every other football code and their supporters (stupidly forgetting there are those who love both AFL and Soccer). I remember being told when I was a little kid playing Soccer it would become the No.1 sport in Australia by the time I was in my late-30s. Well I'm 36 now and nothing has changed. Aussie Rules is more popular and wealthier than ever while deluded Soccer-only nuffers who hate AFL are still telling me that in 30 years time Soccer will be the No.1 sport in Australia lol. Soccer officialdom is the sport's own worst enemy. They will eventually kill off the A-league the way they are going just as they did with the NSL. A different name but same Sydney-centric anti-AFL chip on the shoulder.

Yes, let us not forget the mighty Sydney Swans, what happened to their crowds after 5 years?

http://www.footywire.com/afl/footy/ta-sydney-swans

Oh wait, they dropped in half!!!! Now I know a lot of footy fans, not just me, were appalled at all the handouts and help the Swans got to keep them alive; without the AFL's assistance they would have faded into oblivion. All whilst the Hawks struggled, almost having to merge with the Demons in 1996. If you did your research you would have found out that Brisbane Roar this season have been charging $30 plus for general admin tickets - suicide in the Aussie sporting market. I go to Victory games, but I wouldn't pay $30 plus for general admin to go - it is a rip off. On A league being scheduled in summer - it has to compete against Cricket, and in any case summer scheduling has more to do with the A league coinciding with European leagues/transfer markets.

Two things you fail to address. A League attendances are by in large quite good, considering the standard of the league. When you were a little kid, soccer was a sheilas wogs and ****ters game. Now it is the most participated sport in the country. Nobody has ever predicted AFL's demise. I can see both sports co-existing side by side quite happily in the future. Although the AFL are worried by the lack of youngsters playing the sport now.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom