Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
romanwfw said:it would be hilarious if bucks got injured next week, wouldn't mick get egg on his face then
all of the hawks were injured tonite, that egg truck that rolled on the M1 near shailer park yesterday, had Hawthorn written all over themmantis said:Won't it be hilarious if Crawdord gets injured this week, won't you have egg on your face then.![]()
FuManchu said:all of the hawks were injured tonite, that egg truck that rolled on the M1 near shailer park yesterday, had Hawthorn written all over them
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
romanwfw said:it would be hilarious if bucks got injured next week, wouldn't mick get egg on his face then
eddiesmith said:Swap Nathan for Tarrant and we win
Swap Nathan for Maxwell and we win
DOnt try and say Clokey cost us that game in his 1 and a half qtrs on the groundSaved a couple of goals but no one ever gives him credit for them
Fact was this game will mean nothing come finals time and was not worth the risk of injury, teams have gone to Perth with older players and players under injury clouds, been pumped, lost players for weeks afterwards and their season has gone downhill, others rest players and win flags
Not a chance in hellsante said:It would be pretty funny if Collingwood were to miss the finals by one game![]()
eddiesmith said:Not a chance in hell
If we dont finish top 4 then we honestly suck with our draw, still got the 5 easy beats again, Richmond, Lions, Swans, Eagles in Melbourne, theres 14 wins
Seth said:Keeping him right for September, where's ypur pathetic excuse for a side gonna be? Maybe taking how to counsel a team mate lessons.
VANDA said:I'd like to think so.![]()
What if you miss the finals, or the top 4, by one game. If Collingwood had one more quality midfield/forward rotation in their side (ie: a 100% fit Buckley, which he was acording to Collingwood) they would have beaten the Coasters on their patch and made a significant statement to the competition. The only thing that can be surmised is that Bucks is either carrying something or Mick and the coaching staff got too smart by half and flirted with their form.eddiesmith said:Fact was this game will mean nothing come finals time and was not worth the risk of injury, teams have gone to Perth with older players and players under injury clouds, been pumped, lost players for weeks afterwards and their season has gone downhill, others rest players and win flags
What if Bucks did his hammy and was out for 4 weeks? Or he was so burnt out by that game he couldnt play this week against Geelong?Sedat! said:What if you miss the finals, or the top 4, by one game. If Collingwood had one more quality midfield/forward rotation in their side (ie: a 100% fit Buckley, which he was acording to Collingwood) they would have beaten the Coasters on their patch and made a significant statement to the competition. The only thing that can be surmised is that Bucks is either carrying something or Mick and the coaching staff got too smart by half and flirted with their form.
The 3 hr plane trip excuse is a load of old bollocks. Cashed-up Collingwood could have flown him in earlier, got him a bed in 1st class, had constant physio. That is a furphy. They gained nothing from the weekend that they would not have gained anyway with Buckley in the side. All the decision did was contribute to losing a H&A game that was there for the taking. The Pies have paid a price for this decision, and the cost will not be known until the end of the season.
He was 100% fit according to the club. He would be just as likely to do a hammy this week, or any future week of the season. That's of course if he is actually 100% fit. Mick and the coaching staff would never deliberately try to mislead the football public would theyeddiesmith said:What if Bucks did his hammy and was out for 4 weeks? Or he was so burnt out by that game he couldnt play this week against Geelong?
If 'resting' him is so important to his well-being, you should have done it in the wet last week against Carlton (a game that you would have won easily regardless of Buckley's appearance in the team) and had him cherry ripe for the crucial clash with West Coast. A significant win was there for the taking against West Coast in hostile territory that would have given you vital momentum towards securing a top 4 finish.eddiesmith said:We have 18 games in Melbourne and realistically should win 15 of them, we want him playing every one of those games and a trip to Perth means nothing if we cant win the games we should.
No, better to rest him from the toughest trip and have him fresh for GeelongSedat! said:He was 100% fit according to the club. He would be just as likely to do a hammy this week, or any future week of the season. That's of course if he is actually 100% fit. Mick and the coaching staff would never deliberately try to mislead the football public would they![]()
If 'resting' him is so important to his well-being, you should have done it in the wet last week against Carlton (a game that you would have won easily regardless of Buckley's appearance in the team) and had him cherry ripe for the crucial clash with West Coast. A significant win was there for the taking against West Coast in hostile territory that would have given you vital momentum towards securing a top 4 finish.
No, it was the right decision to leave out an injured player.Cogz24 said:It was the right decision to rest him.