- Banned
- #26
Ryan O'Keefe & Pick 22 -------> Adelaide
Patrick Dangerfield ----> Sydney
Yeah ok. RoK will be retiring end of this season anyway.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ryan O'Keefe & Pick 22 -------> Adelaide
Patrick Dangerfield ----> Sydney
Danger is contracted until end of 2015. Will sign up well before then.
25 year contract.Ryan O'Keefe & Pick 22 -------> Adelaide
Patrick Dangerfield ----> Sydney
Gee, isn't it coincidental that your secret inside source told you this, just after that silly story on the AFL website?Both are restricted free agents next year. Tex is apparently very happy at the club and will re-sign at some point after he returns to the field while Dangerfield doesn't like the direction the club is headed and will test the free agency waters at the end of next year.
10 year contract or 20 year?Ryan O'Keefe & Pick 22 -------> Adelaide
Patrick Dangerfield ----> Sydney
Yer but he thinks the list will be successfulIt's been a long time since I've posted on BF, but I can say that the word from a VERY good source down on the Surf Coast is that the Danger will be looking at moving to Geelong as a free agent at the end of season 2015 when his contract with the Crows is up. He likes Adelaide but is keen to move back home.
He might say that publicly but unfortunately for the Crows it looks like they could be in for some pain having lost Tippett for nothing and also having the draft sanctions, especially considering the massive leg-up some clubs have been given.Yer but he thinks the list will be successful
If cash really is no issue for him, Cats would have to be in the box seat if he leaves the Crows
Family is close to Geelong and his partner is apparently the mayor of Geelong's daughter.
I would!Remember he is restricted so what ever is offered Adelaide will match, he could take a large slice of somebody's cap.
Question is would you pay over 1 mill a season for Danger?
Remember he is restricted so what ever is offered Adelaide will match, he could take a large slice of somebody's cap.
Question is would you pay over 1 mill a season for Danger?
Remember he is restricted so what ever is offered Adelaide will match, he could take a large slice of somebody's cap.
Question is would you pay over 1 mill a season for Danger?
I'm not 100% but will be come restricted at end of 2015 if new PA laws go thru.Is he restricted? I thought given he would be in their top 25% of earners that means he is an unrestricted? Or have I got this mixed up?
Is he restricted? I thought given he would be in their top 25% of earners that means he is an unrestricted? Or have I got this mixed up?
Yup I would Danger and Selwood would be a killer combo...
We've got some good up and comers in our club aged 21 and under. It's more likely we will keep him than lose him and what if he have a great 2 years?He might say that publicly but unfortunately for the Crows it looks like they could be in for some pain having lost Tippett for nothing and also having the draft sanctions, especially considering the massive leg-up some clubs have been given.
Okay, a few things need to be made clear here. Firstly, no rules need to be changed for Dangerfield to be eligible for free agency at the end of next season. The current rules state you must serve eight seasons at one club and Dangerfield will have fulfilled that criteria at the end of next season (count them - 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015). Secondly, unless Adelaide heavily front loaded his three year deal similar to James Frawley, Dangerfield will definitely be in the top 25% of earners at the Crows and therefore will be classed as a restricted free agent.I'm not 100% but will be come restricted at end of 2015 if new PA laws go thru.
there are some things that people won't do for money - moving to Adelaide could be one of those thingsBut but but Adelaide is so much cheaper to live than Melbourne, so following COLA logic, wouldn't players be climbing each other to head TO Adelaide?
Secondly, unless Adelaide heavily front loaded his three year deal similar to James Frawley, Dangerfield will definitely be in the top 25% of earners at the Crows and therefore will be classed as a restricted free agent.
I would be surprised if Dangerfield wasn't in the top 10 highest paid players at Adelaide next year. Restricted status helps but it by no means keeps him at the Crows.This is where it would be good if the crows have used some money we were going to spend on tippett and heavily front load contracts. I imagine they did a similar thing getting betts (~500k a year for three years of whatever, maybe getting 700, 500, 300 each year).
It would be disappointing to lose him, especially if the club gets nothing in return