Of course there is a chance. This is one of the round about points I wanted us to get to. The club and the players are not acting like a group conned by a rougue. Yet you suggest that Hird and the club were deceived.The players don't seem to believe so. Do you think there's a chance they actually know what went on?
So I ask you do you think that the club and the players know now and knew then?
This is why I play my round about clarify your statement games. You claim Hird knew as much as the club in terms of what Dank was doing. You say Dank went rougue. Dank did all the bad stuff on his own.
Yet in the next breath you claim the club knows what went on and everything is safe and ok.
How can the club know this is Dank was rogue in it all?