- Nov 5, 2009
- 10,085
- 9,299
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Wouldn't disagree. But should it be a one off, or should we be looking to make other smart decisions?
Absolutely we should be looking to make other aggressive moves..
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wouldn't disagree. But should it be a one off, or should we be looking to make other smart decisions?
And who do you suggest moving? Has to be someone young enough, someone we can easily replace, yet someone with trade currency. I can think of a few players who meet 2 criteria, very few who meet 3. Henderson, maybe?Absolutely we should be looking to make other aggressive moves..
And who do you suggest moving? Has to be someone young enough, someone we can easily replace, yet someone with trade currency. I can think of a few players who meet 2 criteria, very few who meet 3. Henderson, maybe?
We won't boo him because that's not how we roll.
Does anyone think Collingwood fans will boo Dale Thomas?
The fact is though, it was the right thing to do to trade him out. The fault of Bernie being traded out should be laid upon the doings of the Kurt Tippett drama. For future list management we needed those young draft picks to come in.
We should have a big thumbs down button to click for posts like these.
With Mackay actually playing some good footy this year, it might be time to think about him. Do we think that he's now finally reached form and will retain it? Or is he just having a good patch?
Hard call to make but I guess that's why list managers get paid so well.
Mackay is eligible for Free Agency this year. If he goes, you would expect that it would be under this mechanism rather than being traded. Vince was traded because he was still under contract (and hence not eligible for FA). Mackay is younger than Vince was when he was traded, because Vince wasn't drafted as an U18 player, so he'd definitely have currency.With Mackay actually playing some good footy this year, it might be time to think about him. Do we think that he's now finally reached form and will retain it? Or is he just having a good patch?
Hard call to make but I guess that's why list managers get paid so well.
How good would it be if we could play bernie in Reillys spot right now.
A guy that can actually kick the ball...and not one that has this 'mythical' good disposal
agree though that with the return of Hendo and Otten he'd be hard pressed getting a game.
85% DE. What constitutes good in your opinion?
Mackay is eligible for Free Agency this year. If he goes, you would expect that it would be under this mechanism rather than being traded. Vince was traded because he was still under contract (and hence not eligible for FA). Mackay is younger than Vince was when he was traded, because Vince wasn't drafted as an U18 player, so he'd definitely have currency.
Mackay is also very keen on staying in Adelaide, at least he was last year when his name was being tossed around during trade week. I doubt that's changed. Do not forget that the player still has to sign off on any trade - and it's hard to see him not being offered a new contract by the AFC if he does refuse to be traded.
DE% is a deceiving stat.
Reilly kicks short to a 50-50 the ball get spoiled and that goes down as an effective disposal.
I'm neutral on the idea of trading Mackay. He adds value to the team, but he's not irreplaceable. Has value, but trading someone who doesn't want to leave is bad for team morale (as Brisbane have discovered). I wouldn't be upset if he was traded, I wouldn't be upset if he was re-signed.Cant half tell hes playing a contract year.
Should be retained though, especially because we dont have other players like him.
Big difference.
Thomas left for the money and wanted to leave
Vince was pushed out the door and didnt want to leave
Theyre total opposite ends of the spectrum. In the middle you have the Nathan Bock who just got an offer that was too good to refuse, you cant really hate him for it. Gunston on the other hand...
he's gone to another club, by his choice...he would have got a 1 year contract and its up to him to perform well to get more years....but he chose the easy road and went to another club where an average performance would see him in the best players every week...
i'll be booing the living daylights out of him...he's the enemy now
Clutching at straws. There's nothing wrong with Reilly's disposal.
Also you don't think Port Adelaide's has the edge? Couple of guys a little over the 25 mark but still - Boak, Wines, Hartlett, Wingard, Ebert, Polec, Broadbent, and then Gray at 26? Compared with...Dangerfield, Sloane, Smith, B. Crouch, M. Crouch, Grigg, and Douglas at 27.
Theirs looks stronger imo.
You mean his finals form of 2009. His overall 2009 has become one of the great myths of our time.
Keenly await a few crude statistical representations of his season in retort.
I have been one of Mackay's biggest detractors over the past few years, but in no way should we get rid of him at the end of this year. He is a free-agent at the end of the year and if we let him go - what we get back in compensation will not be what he is worth.
If we were to trade him it should have been 2010/2011 when Melbourne were sniffing around.
My memory is that it was his second half of 2009 that was so good. The impressive thing about it was that he started to get tagged, and yet his output only went up.