Sando is gone - he was delisted. We can not change that, it's done.
The argument isn't about sacking him or not - it's about looking art this as a positive, a negative or a neutral move.
My perspective on it is - we can not say if it's good or bad until we have more information.
If we hypothetically sign a dud like Mark Neeld - it will end up being another negative overseen byChapman but if we sign a coach who can move the playing list forward by making finals and then winning a flag will result in this being a positive but don't ask me to manufacture a positive out of nothing based on past results that have bern a negative.
That's fair enough. I'm a bit more simplistic though. I see it that we came to the conclusion that he wasn't capable of coaching us to a flag. His replacement may not, but if success is winning a flag, then that decision is positive in itself. As long as we continue to make it when the same circumstances present themselves, then we'll always be getting closer to our next flag.