- Banned
- #251
They must have changed the definition of 'exodus'How's the exodus looking? You guys got all the senior players re-signing yeah?
Oh you don't? Well that's a shame.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They must have changed the definition of 'exodus'How's the exodus looking? You guys got all the senior players re-signing yeah?
Oh you don't? Well that's a shame.
No, a good player is better than a bad player regardless of height.
No, a good player is better than a bad player regardless of height.
Rocky is still their best mid.
Beams can hit the scoreboard, though. Great addition.
Brisbane really need some quality KPP or that great midfield will be wasted.
Disagree with this although Rocky will be a better player with Beams there as Beams will take the tag.
I think people forget just how good Daniel Rich is. Once he gets back from his injury and is fully fit, he'll be first tagged. Brisbanes equivalent of Travis Boak IMOGeez I don't want to sound rude but god I have seen a lot of Collingwood supporters speak in definitive statements about our midfield over the past 3 weeks despite having little knowledge whatsoever.
Hanley and Rich normally get the tag because they are so damaging on the outside and they have shown to be more "taggable".
Disagree with this although Rocky will be a better player with Beams there as Beams will take the tag.
Geez I don't want to sound rude but god I have seen a lot of Collingwood supporters speak in definitive statements about our midfield over the past 3 weeks despite having little knowledge whatsoever.
Hanley and Rich normally get the tag because they are so damaging on the outside and they have shown to be more "taggable".
Collingwood supporters "Bu-bu-but Rockliffs 2nd rate and gives off cheapies"
Classic BF tall poppy syndrome at work.
Yes you are right, you haven't lost any other players at all....Exodus? Do go on. Beams is a great player, but I don't think he qualifies as an entire exodus by himself.
We lost one more, a player who the club wanted gone.Yes you are right, you haven't lost any other players at all....
As has been touched on, Rich is easier to shut down with a tag than Beams, which would be in the mind of opposition coaches when deciding who to tag. It'll be the reason some coaches choose to tag Rich, as Beams has a very good record of beating good taggers.Letting Rich run wild without a tag would amount to the opposing team being accused of tanking.
Let both Rich & Beams run without a tag & you'll see who is the most damaging player
As has been touched on, Rich is easier to shut down with a tag than Beams, which would be in the mind of opposition coaches when deciding who to tag. It'll be the reason some coaches choose to tag Rich, as Beams has a very good record of beating good taggers.
Ask an opposition coach who they'd rather be guaranteed to be able to keep quiet for an entire game, and I reckon they would all choose Beams.
Nope, they'd choose Rich/Hanley. 20-25 possessions of Rich or Hanley is far more worth than Beams' 30.
then why did your club just make Beams their highest paid player?
who are you paying more than Beams?