Millky95
Starchild > You
No more cricket for the day. A bit sad. light looks OK
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
it must looks lighter on tv, because I don't see a problem.
A lead of 100 will be hard to come by with just Haddin and the tail left to bat.Get a lead of 100 and have 15 overs at them tomorrow night, we're in the box seat
it always does, I remember the 07 World Cup Final, the commentators were saying they couldn't see what was happening on the field, whereas it looked fine on TVit must looks lighter on tv, because I don't see a problem.
IE just the tail left to batA lead of 100 will be hard to come by with just Haddin and the tail left to bat.
it always does, I remember the 07 World Cup Final, the commentators were saying they couldn't see what was happening on the field, whereas it looked fine on TV
Get a lead of 100 and have 15 overs at them tomorrow night, we're in the box seat
Sorry. Forgot why I put Haddin in there. BrainfadeIE just the tail left to bat
image of the day
keep your eyes open son
Annoying that Dohni simply says, 'I'm gunna bowl the quicks' and that's the end of the days play.
Shaun Marsh.I just wish Sean Marsh and Watson weren't so predictable with giving away their wicket easily
Drugs.
4/220 v 6/97.Maybe evens, wouldn't say it was all Australia today no matter how much Tubby pumps our tyres.
Annoying that Dohni simply says, 'I'm gunna bowl the quicks' and that's the end of the days play.
I never took outfield/skied catches that way, always took them with fingers pointing up. I found that way I rarely dropped one.His eyes close after he drops the ball to be fair. The ball fell further in front of him than he was expecting, still a bad drop though.
Certainly won't get shot down. Watson has to go. He hasn't scored well in ages.Probably get shot down by cricket lovers (as opposed to a casual cricket fan i.e. me) but surely Watson has to go (or soon). He's never had a rich vein of form that allows him to have a slump, and surely even last summer his 100s (or 1 of them) came when 2 or 3 others smacked the Poms too - not like Smith in Perth for example. Really don't see why we need Watson. I guess people may argue who could replace him...
Think we're doing really well without Clarke and Harris, and an injured Mitch Marsh so far. I think unless Johnson (or Starc in response to criticism) pulls a rabbit out we may struggle to get 20 wickets in time to get the runs, but it's not out of our reach and a draw is more than salvagable.