Sam Mitchell missed the 'let's all move on' memo.

[the_interloper]

In 1998 the Crows won a flag by using exotic experimental drugs. Hence the point. That you are a hypocrite

Wat?

 

[threesixpio]

you know that CAS is just an appeal right? And that the reason for the appeal is that the players were found not guilty of an adrv right?

You are, quite simply, nothing more than a hypocritical pitchfork waver, but hey, you're not alone.

Bunk says it's not an appeal and some boso says it's double jeopardy or something?

 

[GarnerSmash]

Wow...

Thats called the "Mum, they are picking on me" defence.

 

[Lance Uppercut]

How am I a hypocrit? WADA did not exist in 1998 so we were not breaking rules and secondly the substance wasn't an exotic drug at all, it was a natural supplement, unlike the prescribed concoctions your mob were given. It wasn't banned then, and isn't banned now. So what the **** is your point?

the point is that you're a hypocrite. Because you heap abuse on Essendon for experimenting with drugs whilst trying desperately to somehow find a way to pretend your team didn't do exactly the same thing. Who cares if WADA didn't exist. Your team did whatever it took to win that flag.

 

[Lance Uppercut]

Wat?

article posted a few pages back

 

[Lance Uppercut]

Bunk says it's not an appeal and some boso says it's double jeopardy or something?

so?

It is an appeal. That is a simple statement of fact

 

[romeohwho]

Go Lance. Go Jenny.

 

[Ron The Bear]

So do we all accept Mark Evans' assertion that "people need to respect the position of the Essendon players"?

 

[DERIBERATE]

Pardon my ignorance, what was it?

Milk

 

[HirdsTheWord]

So do we all accept Mark Evans' assertion that "people need to respect the position of the Essendon players"?

Not when a keyboard and anonymity is involved.

 

[Satan]

Milk

Firstborn calfs milk ?

 

[Reality rules]

Milk

Thanks.........what was it, A1 or A2, don't want the upset tummy you know?

 

[Satan]

the point is that you're a hypocrite. Because you heap abuse on Essendon for experimenting with drugs whilst trying desperately to somehow find a way to pretend your team didn't do exactly the same thing. Who cares if WADA didn't exist. Your team did whatever it took to win that flag.

You need a bex ,Lance getting a bit stressed

 

[DERIBERATE]

Thanks.........what was it, A1 or A2, don't want the upset tummy you know?

Cows produce milk all the time, but when they're preggo there's more good stuff in the milk.


Why do you think they call us the Cows?

 

[Moquo]

Egg on my face? What did I do?

Eat carpet?

 

[Ron The Bear]

Not when a keyboard and anonymity is involved.

How about the crowd mimicking Mitchell at the next Essendon game?

 

[Reality rules]

How about the crowd mimicking Mitchell at the next Essendon game?

That won't go unseen or unhird will it!

 

[threesixpio]

so?

It is an appeal. That is a simple statement of fact

Don't agree

 

[DapperJong]

Don't agree

What is it then

 

[threesixpio]

so?

It is an appeal. That is a simple statement of fact

Different prosecutor. Starting from scratch. I actually don't mind the double jeopardy argument except it's too lofty for this kind of thing

 

[HirdsTheWord]

How about the crowd mimicking Mitchell at the next Essendon game?

Love for one of them to get in front of someone who actually knows to about the facts and watch how fast they get shut down. It's easy to do when you don't have to answer for your actions.

But it's all banter and I'm not too fussed. I am sure there's been a mass of jibes about it for the last 3 years, only just caught on TV this time.

 

[threesixpio]

What is it then

It's some weird not quite appeal...is that good enough an answer? The tribunal decision counts for nothing re CAS

 

[Ron The Bear]

Love for one of them to get in front of someone who actually knows to about the facts and watch how fast they get shut down. It's easy to do when you don't have to answer for your actions.

But it's all banter and I'm not too fussed. I am sure there's been a mass of jibes about it for the last 3 years, only just caught on TV this time.

That's just it, nobody knows the facts so the public assumes Essendon's guilt after they warned off Dank, Charter etc instead of compelling them to testify.

Guess there's no room left under the AFL's rug.

 

[blue healer]

Love for one of them to get in front of someone who actually knows to about the facts and watch how fast they get shut down. It's easy to do when you don't have to answer for your actions.

But it's all banter and I'm not too fussed. I am sure there's been a mass of jibes about it for the last 3 years, only just caught on TV this time.

Just curious about who this mysterious person that knows the facts could be?

 

[HirdsTheWord]

That's just it, nobody knows the facts so the public assumes Essendon's guilt after they warned off Dank, Charter etc instead of compelling them to testify.

Guess there's no room left under the AFL's rug.

How about the fact that they were cleared by an independant tribunal based on an absolute lack of evidence presented by ASADA. is that not fact enough for you?

And where is your proof that Essendon made witnesses not testify?

This is half the problem. None of you actually deal in facts, you just assume what you want to hear.

And what happened to the presumption of innocence? We assume guilt now? Pretty poor form.

but i dont want to turn this thread into another regurgitation of the same 100 other threads. What mitchell did was hilariously ironic at best. Water off a ducks back, the players didnt seem bothered by it, i doubt it was the first taunt they hav received over the last 3 years and it wont be the last. Most of the reaction is manufactured by the media....as usual.