I'd prefer to give the young players 2 years development instead. Armfield, White and Rowe have no future at the club. Give the young players a go and start developing the list. If those 3 players play the next 2 years they have taken up to 132 AFL games off young players.
I'm sure the club caved into Rowe's demands for 2yrs vs 1yr we had tabled last season. He would have been in the firing line for de-listing.
White has been on 1yr contracts for a while now, can't see why that would change, especially in our current list management position.
Army provides 100% but we need to keep our options open moving forward with the older players.
We're still going to need to cull more players if the supposed player count in is close to the mark.