ESKIE
Keeping it Cool.
- Feb 28, 2009
- 31,817
- 53,451
- AFL Club
- Carlton
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, this is why Hal Hunter has been pushing for documents, a guilty plea as is being suggested could well and truly open the way for further actions from those who were under their "care" at the timwWorksafe prosecution opens the door for a class action re loss of future earnings/breach of DOC/breach of contract, no?
Worksafe prosecution opens the door for a class action re loss of future earnings/breach of DOC/breach of contract, no?
I don't get the Hal Hunter thing. He wasn't part of the *34 and, as far as I'm aware, hasn't been handed a SCN. All of that would seem to indicate that he isn't believed by ASADA to have received any banned substances. Is he playing the angle of health issues based on unknown substances?Yes, this is why Hal Hunter has been pushing for documents, a guilty plea as is being suggested could well and truly open the way for further actions from those who were under their "care" at the timw
Well may we say god save the queen, cos nothing will save the essendon football club
He may have been part of the program and got injected with something, just not TB4.I don't get the Hal Hunter thing. He wasn't part of the *34 and, as far as I'm aware, hasn't been handed a SCN. All of that would seem to indicate that he isn't believed by ASADA to have received any banned substances. Is he playing the angle of health issues based on unknown substances?
Worksafe prosecution opens the door for a class action re loss of future earnings/breach of DOC/breach of contract, no?
Where did I say they'd win? It does give them the opportunity to begin the class action.
Are you a lawyer?But it doesn't. You need to have a proper basis to start a claim and that includes having and injury or loss that can be compensated. At the moment, all they have is evidence that the club did something wrong. The Court will say say "yeah....so what?"
Lots of other lawyers around stating the opposite of what you are. I'll be interested in how it pans out.Yes...and I deal with exactly these sorts of issues in various contexts.
Not sure what to say except I have been exactly this kind of stuff for a long time at a major national firm. Proving that you have suffered an injury as a result of the negligence is one of the most basic tenets of Tort law.
If someone realises that they have suffered an injury as a result of this in the future, sure, sue them (unless it's over 12 years since the injection, which is a whole other story). The same goes for if they do actually suffer lost wages.
Not questioning you either but where is the grounds for this Hal Hunter stuff?