Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 10
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Sounds like vigilantism to me.
Has that stopped it, or moved on a little further down the line?
Don't you report criminality to the cops rather than taking things into your own hands? They're paid to deal with that s**t.
He seems not to think this makes any difference. Or has some sort of blindness to certain facts. Or something. I don't know.They tend to have more contact time with children so you have to factor that in!
This is your claim to act as an apologist for the abuse of children by mothers. You will not back it up though.You don't understand the idea that if, say, 85% of people are responsible for 70% of something they are under-represented. If 15% of people are responsible for 30% of something, they are WAY over-represented.
Chief has said multiple times on this site that men are overrepresented as abusers of children and even said it is not close. That is what they are implying in this part of the post.They tend to have more contact time with children so you have to factor that in!
They never have anything to back it up despite being requested time and time again. My contention has been that both genders abuse children and there are some categories that are more prone than others including single mothers and stepfathers as examples of disproportionate perpetrators.You don't understand the idea that if, say, 85% of people are responsible for 70% of something they are under-represented. If 15% of people are responsible for 30% of something, they are WAY over-represented.
Mate. It's pretty clear:Chief has said multiple times on this site that men are overrepresented as abusers of children and even said it is not close. That is what they are implying in this part of the post.
They never have anything to back it up despite being requested time and time again. My contention has been that both genders abuse children and there are some categories that are more prone than others including single mothers and stepfathers as examples of disproportionate perpetrators.
The conversation on family violence seems to forget the female contribution to child abuse which is why I mention it more here.
The idea that women and men could be as bad as each other when it comes to the abuse of children seems to do the head in of Chief
They then resort to petulance, insults and abuse because they interpret an inconvenient truth as anti women.
Speaking of ugly posts.He seems not to think this makes any difference. Or has some sort of blindness to certain facts. Or something. I don't know.
I shouldn't respond but this thread keeps showing up in my participated list on Tapatalk and I cave when particularly dumb and ugly posts are made.
Reads like the reply of a bully. Not a good look.You don't care about child abuse. You care about blaming women, probably due to a bad marriage break-up, bad mother, or both.
You are a joke amongst users of this site, moderators included. Friends I show your posts to (and the posts of others) say things like "why do you even want a dickhead like that on your site?"
Why indeed?
If you read over my posting history on this subject which kicked off in the domestic violence thread you would see you know nothing about what I have pushed on this site.Mate. It's pretty clear:
1. You don't get stats
2. You're not trying to push that last claim.
My contention is that mothers and fathers both abuse children without claiming one gender is proportionately more likely to than the other.(my statments on that have been about single mothers and stepfathers)Mate. It's pretty clear:
1. You don't get stats
2. You're not trying to push that last claim.
If you read over my posting history on this subject which kicked off in the domestic violence thread you would see you know nothing about what I have pushed on this site.
I saw your posts in the domestic violence thread. Don't assume things.My contention is that mothers and fathers both abuse children without claiming one gender is proportionately more likely to than the other.(my statments on that have been about single mothers and stepfathers)
USA government department comprehensive statistics show that the mother was a perpetrator in 70% of instances.
Disprove it if you disagree.
It was partly a tongue in cheek comment relating to the sentencing gap. Maybe not that tasteful but no offence intended!How long does she deserve?
What sentence should she receive, that would make you feel it's fair?
Serious question.
If you read over my posting history on this subject which kicked off in the domestic violence thread you would see you know nothing about what I have pushed on this site.
Men are stronger then women so you have to factor this into domestic violence statistics!Deserves jail time but might get away with community service with her ladies discount
They tend to have more contact time with children so you have to factor that in!
They're*Relax BORK....Their trying to put you on the defensive, in a good old classic pincer manoeuvre....Regather your Clarity.
It's all been discussed. You don't understand reports you're reading, even the ones where the author cautions against drawing conclusions due to issues with data collection and categorisation.
You don't understand the idea that if, say, 85% of people are responsible for 70% of something they are under-represented. If 15% of people are responsible for 30% of something, they are WAY over-represented.
You don't care about child abuse. You care about blaming women, probably due to a bad marriage break-up, bad mother, or both.
Factors like poverty and alcohol are brought up as soon as "gendered violence!" is mentioned. But dropped pretty quickly as soon as the conversation turns to ways to solve that - likely your conservative views making the cognitive dissonance unbearable.
Right now you're just stinking up threads with your screechy, repetitive rubbish and now dumb pictures. You are a joke amongst users of this site, moderators included. Friends I show your posts to (and the posts of others) say things like "why do you even want a dickhead like that on your site?"
Why indeed?
When you do the breakdown of who lives with whom ( e.g. many more single mothers), the men are over-represented and the women are under. This has been posted many times.My contention is that mothers and fathers both abuse children without claiming one gender is proportionately more likely to than the other.(my statments on that have been about single mothers and stepfathers)
USA government department comprehensive statistics show that the mother was a perpetrator in 70% of instances.
Disprove it if you disagree.
What is linking to every newspaper report doing for the discussion?
"Mewmewmewmew women abuse too!"