- Banned
- #1,051
You're actually a joke.The Russian media isn't any better than the Western media, but the Western media is just spewing out whatever the USA government wants it to. The track record of USA foreign intelligence agencies over the last 15 years is appalling, yet our media lapped it up without ever questioning it. The Germans have now proven that one of the major points that led to sanctions was a lie in that the Russians did not supply to SAM to the rebels to shoot down MH17, but they obtained it from Ukraine army supplies. So how much else is false?
If you look back you will see that I have always said that the truth is somewhere in the middle of what the Russians say and what NATO countries have said, the problem is too many believe Western media and social media as being factual, they aren't. Just look at the social media photos that Ukraine used to claim that Russian tanks had crossed the border which Western press also lapped up. They didn't even realise that the a number of photos were taken at a completely different time of year! When this was pointed out the press just let it die, did they report that they had been lied to by the Ukraine government? hell no, but if it was a Russian lie it'd be all over the news. As an example of lopsided media, any Russian intelligence plane flying near the border is reported, but somehow we don't say anything about incidences where the NATO countries are the protagonist and incurred into Russia, which has happened recently.
Can't reference the quote but I'll use it anyway
"Blind faith in your leaders will get you killed"
So you benevolently concede that Russian media is no better than its Western counterpart, yet bang on about how the latter is 'spewing out' US gov. propaganda, to paraphrase. Ad infinitum. Well seeing you're being so ecumenical, let us hear about your criticism of Any Russian medium. Come on.
Can you .. well can ya? Have you ever read the shmata, Pravda? Of course not. You rely on googled, propagandist sources to fuel your clearly entrenched bias.
Clap clap. And the sad thing is, you don't even know.
To even suggest, at this juncture, that anyone other than Putin's boiz were responsible for killing the people on MH 17 beggars belief.
Didn't it come to attention that in the immediate aftermath, Putin said nothing ... for days? He obviously had to consult his New York PR firms to determine how best to deflect the blame.
Irony, get it? He pays a motza to companies in America for PR. A selective nemesis for him?
As for NATO's incursions into Russia, wtf? Let's compare that to the Yalta Agreement gift ... then less tacit incursions. Ask the people of Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania, Ukraine, Belarus, Romania, where do I stop? Germany split in half, rather embarrassing. Millions of people left to the devices of Uncle Joe (Stalin, for you). I suppose we can be thankful there was no internet during the Russian/Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia in 1968, otherwise one can only imagine the spin: nazi, fascist Czechs vs the adorable Russians who were just trying to keep the peace. Sound familiar?
Disdain for the US, justifiable at times, need not translate to affection for a heinous regime, by default.
Why do millions of people try to get into the US and other western countries every year and er, none to Russia? Unless they're masochists.
Lucky you're anonymous - Centrelink won't know how you spend your time.