Its a piece of propaganda.What is it about those words military expansion. WHY? Why not just expansion for the good of humanity. We are a stuffed up creature aren't we?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Its a piece of propaganda.What is it about those words military expansion. WHY? Why not just expansion for the good of humanity. We are a stuffed up creature aren't we?
or those in Washington with the Saudis and manipulating the oil priceRussia has some nukes thats its power threat , but economically it is being destroyed, by who? Putin. Believe it!
or those in Washington with the Saudis and manipulating the oil price
And along with a bunch of european economies that aren't doing real well out of sanctions either[/QUOTE
What happens there, is, they'll develope the gas feilds in the Mediteranean , with Israel and anyone smart enough to join in and they will over come the problems with argueing with Russia and its gas in the interim .Thats what free countries do . And even though it is hard , they always end up in front .
Its the way it happens, its logic and people in down trodden lands look and wonder , why not here.
ISLAMIC RADICALS AND DICTATORSHIP FOOLS ALWAYS GO DOWN HARD.
It has never been any different and it never will. Its the way of the world, how ever you want to say it, things that help and not hurt people will always win out , its just life. A natural course of existance.
So what happened to Libya, Syria and Ukraine is a fantasy ? Washington regime change agenda is a recipe for disaster.Putin did well in his first spell. Embraced relations with western countries and opened up business opportunities for Russian companies.
He's totally lost the plot these days. Seeing conspiracy theories everywhere and coming up with rubbish that wouldn't even be worthy of the bigfooty conspiracy theory boards. He's isolating Russia once again and it seems he'd prefer a return to the cold war days. He really needs to leave Ukraine alone and sort itself out. Only then will Russia start to recover and dig itself out of the hole Putin has created with his totalitarian leadership.
the Ukraine putsch on the first g'vt 18 months ago? come one dude, get a grip. And dont think they were not balls deep in Cairo and Tripoli neither.You're bonkers if you think the Americans had anything to do with any of those three - Libya and Syria were part of the Arab spring, a movement which has actually been against American interests rather than for, and there was no US government involvement in Ukraine. Some individuals of Ukrainian descent threw in some money, but otherwise it was people protesting a government that flat out lied about its intentions and turned out to be a flagrant Kremlin puppet government, until the government could no longer function and collapsed. If only the people in this country had the same amount of fortitude, we could be rid of the current group of corrupt Tory s**t stains for a very long time.
the Ukraine putsch on the first g'vt 18 months ago? come one dude, get a grip. And dont think they were not balls deep in Cairo and Tripoli neither.
the only reason Mubarak was in power was because of the support of Washington you nincompoop. just cos the spokesperson jay carney, or J Carney, heck, its america, so i will go with J Carney. just cos J Carney says its so, does not make it so.The US was in favour of the overthrown Mubarak Egyptian government, so clearly you don't know s**t. The change in Libya has been the only arab spring revolt that removed a government the US was opposed to, otherwise all the toppled dictatorships and ongoing/failed revolts in countries like Jordan have been very much against American interests in the region.
Wishing it were true about Ukraine doesn't make it so either - Russia were the only foreign government involved, and their puppet was the one deposed.
BS.No, you fundamentally misunderstand decades of US foreign policy. What they favour above all else is stability, as befits the nation on top. They don't care who is in charge, what kind of dictatorship it is, what rights the citizens have - as long as the country is first and foremost stable, and secondarily the leader is pro-US or willing to toe the line when required (and in the past they also had to be anti-communist).
Mubarak. Musharraf. Ngo Dinh Diem. Pinochet. The Shah. Suharto. House of Saud. Musharraf. The list is long.
All of those Arab governments were stable and more or less willing to do what the Americans wanted in a region where instability comes naturally. Now that the governments have been toppled, what next? Will they make the relationship untenable by electing Islamic governments, or go secular? And if they're secular, what happens if they fall under the economic sway of Beijing first?
All of this still doesn't change the fact that the President of Ukraine was deposed after it was discovered by the Ukrainian people he was taking his orders from the Kremlin, when he announced the signing of a one-sided long term economic contract with Russia that precluded any move towards the EU - with no justification - despite explicitly promising otherwise during the election. How shocking that prepositioned Russian army troops were ready to invade Ukraine as soon as the deposed President was exfiltrated to Russia by a special forces team.
You think whoever replaces Putin will be more diplomatic ? Could be worse.Wow! The Ukraine troubles might be over, Putin hasn't been seen in public for 8 days and a death notice had been put up briefly before being taken down.
Its when they allowed ultra-right wing soccer thugs burn 40 pro-russians mostly women alive that the war really Kicked off.No, you fundamentally misunderstand decades of US foreign policy. What they favour above all else is stability, as befits the nation on top. They don't care who is in charge, what kind of dictatorship it is, what rights the citizens have - as long as the country is first and foremost stable, and secondarily the leader is pro-US or willing to toe the line when required (and in the past they also had to be anti-communist).
Mubarak. Musharraf. Ngo Dinh Diem. Pinochet. The Shah. Suharto. House of Saud. Musharraf. The list is long.
All of those Arab governments were stable and more or less willing to do what the Americans wanted in a region where instability comes naturally. Now that the governments have been toppled, what next? Will they make the relationship untenable by electing Islamic governments, or go secular? And if they're secular, what happens if they fall under the economic sway of Beijing first?
All of this still doesn't change the fact that the President of Ukraine was deposed after it was discovered by the Ukrainian people he was taking his orders from the Kremlin, when he announced the signing of a one-sided long term economic contract with Russia that precluded any move towards the EU - with no justification - despite explicitly promising otherwise during the election. How shocking that prepositioned Russian army troops were ready to invade Ukraine as soon as the deposed President was exfiltrated to Russia by a special forces team.
No, you fundamentally misunderstand decades of US foreign policy. What they favour above all else is stability, as befits the nation on top. They don't care who is in charge, what kind of dictatorship it is, what rights the citizens have - as long as the country is first and foremost stable, and secondarily the leader is pro-US or willing to toe the line when required (and in the past they also had to be anti-communist).
Mubarak. Musharraf. Ngo Dinh Diem. Pinochet. The Shah. Suharto. House of Saud. Musharraf. The list is long.
All of those Arab governments were stable and more or less willing to do what the Americans wanted in a region where instability comes naturally. Now that the governments have been toppled, what next? Will they make the relationship untenable by electing Islamic governments, or go secular? And if they're secular, what happens if they fall under the economic sway of Beijing first?
All of this still doesn't change the fact that the President of Ukraine was deposed after it was discovered by the Ukrainian people he was taking his orders from the Kremlin, when he announced the signing of a one-sided long term economic contract with Russia that precluded any move towards the EU - with no justification - despite explicitly promising otherwise during the election. How shocking that prepositioned Russian army troops were ready to invade Ukraine as soon as the deposed President was exfiltrated to Russia by a special forces team.
Its when they allowed ultra-right wing soccer thugs burn 40 pro-russians mostly women alive that the war really Kicked off.
No its notThat's a bullshit Russian propaganda myth Vlad.
No its not