We're not going to play a batsman posing as a keeper in test cricket. So no Doolan, Warner or Dunk for keeper
Damn thought we could trial a part time keeper like a Doolan and get away with it haha
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We're not going to play a batsman posing as a keeper in test cricket. So no Doolan, Warner or Dunk for keeper
#wadeforthetestteamNo pretending required, he is good enough.
So why bother saying india would've won if they'd done more with their second innings. At crucial periods in this test India weren't able to capitalise on their position of dominance - they will rue their efforts not to build a better first innings score after being 4/311 after day one and then fail to close out Australia's first innings when they had us at 6/247 to eventually concede a near 100 run leadInsightful. Yes I'm aware of that.
http://www.outlookindia.com/news/ar...s-Gabba-at-Lunch-Over-Missing-Veg-Dish/873616
if that is true then I can only laugh!
http://www.outlookindia.com/news/ar...s-Gabba-at-Lunch-Over-Missing-Veg-Dish/873616
if that is true then I can only laugh!
I'm with the above posters, if they are failing to provide vegetarian options then it's pretty poor form.http://www.outlookindia.com/news/ar...s-Gabba-at-Lunch-Over-Missing-Veg-Dish/873616
if that is true then I can only laugh!
No wonder Siddle and Sharma have both been bowling s**t!http://www.outlookindia.com/news/ar...s-Gabba-at-Lunch-Over-Missing-Veg-Dish/873616
if that is true then I can only laugh!
well done aussies and smithySo why bother saying india would've won if they'd done more with their second innings. At crucial periods in this test India weren't able to capitalise on their position of dominance - they will rue their efforts not to build a better first innings score after being 4/311 after day one and then fail to close out Australia's first innings when they had us at 6/247 to eventually concede a near 100 run lead
Then after absorbing a tricky patch to end day 3 they capitulated and only managed to post a moderate lead thanks to a fighting knock from a guy who's somewhat selfish decision not to bat at the start of play helped create the calamity to begin with
Sure the run chase was a bit shambolic towards the end but we had 7 wickets in hand within 20 runs and I think the batsmen weren't as mentally focused as they might have been had they needed more than 15 runs or so to win
India did persevere and credit to them for that but it was their inability to do that earlier that cost them
Would've. Could've. Should've. Didn't.
Why Wade? He has shown nothing with the gloves or bat. I was all for him replacing Haddin a few years ago because he had the fire and form. Then they picked him and his keeping was absolutely atrocious. I partially blame Wade for Lyon's lack of wicket taking in the past. You can't take wickets when your keeper misses most catches and stumpings.Or Wade.
And then not being allowed to bring their own they bought into the GABBA??I'm with the above posters, if they are failing to provide vegetarian options then it's pretty poor form.
No. Being a vegetarian is the reason. Never cater for for these people!No wonder Siddle and Sharma have both been bowling s**t!
So why bother saying india would've won if they'd done more with their second innings. At crucial periods in this test India weren't able to capitalise on their position of dominance - they will rue their efforts not to build a better first innings score after being 4/311 after day one and then fail to close out Australia's first innings when they had us at 6/247 to eventually concede a near 100 run lead
Then after absorbing a tricky patch to end day 3 they capitulated and only managed to post a moderate lead thanks to a fighting knock from a guy who's somewhat selfish decision not to bat at the start of play helped create the calamity to begin with
Sure the run chase was a bit shambolic towards the end but we had 7 wickets in hand within 20 runs and I think the batsmen weren't as mentally focused as they might have been had they needed more than 15 runs or so to win
India did persevere and credit to them for that but it was their inability to do that earlier that cost them
Would've. Could've. Should've. Didn't.
Someone needs to tell these guys about the s**t holes Australia had to live in and the conditions they had to endure in the 1969-70 tour (and other tours) of India. Players returning home with life threatening illnesses, some never playing cricket again. They may not feel so bad about a little bit of meat they can push to one side on their plate. Even up to recent times, Australians have had to ship in their own water and food whilst on tour to India. If they're not happy, I suggest they learn to do the same.
I'm with the above posters, if they are failing to provide vegetarian options then it's pretty poor form.
Me too. Should be doing better on this (assuming the report is correct). Expecting a vegetarian option is not unreasonable, it's not like they were asking for quinoa and goji berries or whatever it was the Poms expected last year!
First of all, it's not 1969 anymore. Secondly, you don't honestly believe that 'pushing meat to the side of the plate' is a genuine and viable alternative for a vegetarian? Particularly one of Indian origin (on the assumption it's beef).
Yes, believe it or not, I am aware it is not 1969 any more, so stop being a smart arse, okay? My point is, if you cared to understand my post, is that travelling overseas is fraught with many worse things than not getting a meal to your liking. Happens to me every time. I manage to survive, just as I am sure the Indian players will as well. Australian cricketers are aware of that which is why on occasion they cater for it with their own provisions. Geez, people need to toughen up in today's world. "Oh, boo hoo, I didn't get exactly what I asked for". Well, tough. Deal with it.