- Jun 5, 2015
- 13,172
- 8,797
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Other Teams
- Liverpool
Sorry did not take you into consideration regarding Kumar posted. I keep on thinking why you said none of my business then I look at you name finally get it slow learner.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Collingwood v Melbourne - 3:20PM Mon
Squiggle tips Pies at 52% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
EUFA EURO 2024 - Group Stage ⚽ EPL 24/25 starts Aug 17
Sorry did not take you into consideration regarding Kumar posted. I keep on thinking why you said none of my business then I look at you name finally get it slow learner.
Maybe he want out himself.Moller I was a little surprised - you put 3 years into a ruckman that's still at least a couple of years off maturing enough to be AFL ready and you think he'd get a chance to continue his improvement.
Of course that's mainly based on Peel reports on this board talking up his ability to take pack marks. Maybe our coaching staff were blinking when that happened because he had plenty of games this year (stat wise) where he was freaking terrible.
Other than that, the only other thing i'm surprised about is that there aren't more delistings.
Sorry did not take you into consideration regarding Kumar posted. I keep on thinking why you said none of my business then I look at you name finally get it slow learner.
Maybe he want out himself.
Moo regarding this I did not post about you , I refer to Kumar monkey stuff as cow sh1tHey - what I do in my spare time is my business, not yours.
Consenting adults and all that.
Only reason Vadeleur was kept is because of Depth. If a defender is on the Long term injury list, he might get games in 2016. So 4 people delisted with McPharlin and Sylvias retirement. That leaves 6 spots. Bennell is coming here so that makes 5.I'm a little surprised by the delisting of Moller and JB but I'm more surprised that Vandeleur has survived for a third year. Obviously he must bring the right attitude to training and the club sees something that he doesn't consistently show on game day.
Sad that it's taken this long for you to work that out.
Max's perfofrmances at Peelalways thought max could be something decent. exactly what freo needs, a confident, some what cocky goal hungry forward.
I would have released Hannath ahead of Moller at least Moller works hard in games for Peel. I have seen him in about 3 games this season and I have watched him in Game simulation training against main squad on a number of occasions. He is about 20 yrs old and we all know big guys take time to develop.Moller I was a little surprised - you put 3 years into a ruckman that's still at least a couple of years off maturing enough to be AFL ready and you think he'd get a chance to continue his improvement.
Of course that's mainly based on Peel reports on this board talking up his ability to take pack marks. Maybe our coaching staff were blinking when that happened because he had plenty of games this year (stat wise) where he was freaking terrible.
Other than that, the only other thing i'm surprised about is that there aren't more delistings.
Hmm..Iamjunglemuffin maybe?
I was surprised about Ballard as I have seen him live in a number of games and he got 26 Sandover medal votes or thereabouts which I thought was pretty good.Hey guys, no trolling here but like others just wanted to share how surprised I was to see Jacob Ballard de-listed, like a number of other posters already have.
I understand his 2 year rookie contract was up but from what I've seen and heard of his WAFL footy he has done more than enough to earn a contract extension or even a rookie elevation now that a few list spots will open up.
Seems like a real contested ball specialist and I hope he stays with Peel Thunder but I'm sure he'll attract attention from other AFL and state league based clubs.
Well done to loyal servants of the club in McPharlin, Duffield and Crowley. Interesting to see if Crowley has interest from other clubs. More likely a pre season or rookie selection to a club in need of hard at it, compromising midfielders.
Duffy I'm not surprised with one bit. Poor attitude that he has taken with him since juniors.
Ballard 26 Sandover votes says he can play.How many Peel games did you seem him play ?He got a heap of the ball but imo from what I seen just wasn't all that good. Sad for a young bloke and probably a bit unlucky but I'm not really that surprised.
Only 2 live, most of the ones on TV. Kane Mitchell actually won a Sandover, he is still crap in the AFL.Ballard 26 Sandover votes says he can play.How many Peel games did you seem him play ?
Hey - what I do in my spare time is my business, not yours.
Consenting adults and all that.
Ballard 26 Sandover votes says he can play.How many Peel games did you seem him play ?
Your obviously not referring to yourself because your not very smart.Your new around here - a word of advice - don't tangle with the smartest guy in the room.
Your obviously not referring to yourself because your not very smart.
I'm not having trouble with my Windows computer, so you can hang up now.
Kind of the point of my whole post, Clem. Too subtle?*You're
Sorry.
Kind of the point of my whole post, Clem. Too subtle?
*You're
Sorry.
Only 2 live, most of the ones on TV. Kane Mitchell actually won a Sandover, he is still crap in the AFL.
Not exactly the deadwood people were calling for...
Are you saying from what you saw on TV that Ballard wasnt any good.? I have also watched him Live on a number of occasions and on TV and at many training sessions and I feel we have done him a disservice by de-listing him unless he requested it.Only 2 live, most of the ones on TV. Kane Mitchell actually won a Sandover, he is still crap in the AFL.