Klim
Brownlow Medallist
- Sep 17, 2013
- 12,532
- 10,363
- AFL Club
- Sydney
If D wins I'm expecting a cheque in the mail.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You'll be expecting a cheque??If D wins I'm expecting a cheque in the mail.
You'll be expecting a cheque??
Rather, the rule goes out because this admin didn't make the decision. Well, Chapman is still there. And the master of administration and jumper reveals NigeI'm not sure why changing admin requires a new clash jumper, but alright.
Tigers can wear yellow tonight because the Crows don't have a whole third of the front and almost quarter of the back in a massive block of gold.Sorry if Tiges can wear yellow tonight...no reason the crows can't wear yellow against WCE Tri or Richmond...as for the hawks...wear navy for christ's sake
Carlton v Eagles happened once and was bullcrap, should never have happened.Fair point . Maybe Carlton v Eagles (see my edit above ) or St Kilda v Gold Coast would be a better analogy ?
http://www.bordermail.com.au/story/...suns-vs-st-kilda-saints-photos/?cs=54#slide=4
But to be honest I'm hoping out home tripanel gets changed to navy wings next year
If anything it looks way too much like WWT.Different colour blue, yellow instead of white, different hoop width and 3 hoops instead of 2...
Yeah, I'm not seeing it. There's other jumpers in the AFL that are 100x more similar than these 2.
And the home looks like Centrals (lighter blue, switch gold for white)If anything it looks way too much like WWT.
Yeah it was a farceCarlton v Eagles happened once and was bullcrap, should never have happened.
St Kilda have less red than West Coast but I also think that a whole third of the front counts as a major colour.
Just because it's an option doesn't mean it'll be selected regardless of the vote.How does Brisbane's submission to use a gold jumper with a maroon lion (based on the Bears jumper) get rejected by the AFL, but the Crows have there potential option A available to be chosen?
I don't think the Adelaide clash is that bad it needs to be replaced before the 2 year rule.Z
I don't think it's really that bad at all, it's just not quite what everyone wants.
Just because it's an option doesn't mean it'll be selected regardless of the vote.
I'm surprised, it's better than the Crow head one, and probably not quite as good as the flock of crows.nSorry, but the general consensus on our board is that it is one of the most putrid efforts we have ever come up with. Almost no-one likes it
I think it's as simple as make the people think you are trying to give them what you want, but really select one they don't and say "the majority voted for it" and make you think it was kids who overruled.I am aware of this, however, you would think if a club is coming up with potential designs to put to vote, they would make sure they get some kind of preliminary AFL approval. You're just setting up your supporters for disappointment and/or anger towards the AFL if the voted design gets knocked back.
A brand as heavily protective as the AFL would surely set-out some pre-disclosure approval process before making any design officially public.
The Lions never actually publicly announced their intentions to release a gold based clash, however numerous sources on this board have confirmed to have seen prototypes of this rumoured guernsey, and been explicitly told the AFL have knocked them back. There is likelihood that they may be lying, but I see no buring reason too.
Because WCE Tri-Panel, I guess. With the TP on the way out there are no more issues. My guess is Brisbane got told no, then came the Richmond clash jumper debarcle mk II, and the AFL let Richmond get a yellow one and just made sure they didn't play away to WCE this year, knowing that the TP was on the way out. I expect BL's next clash will be gold - they can't be denied now.How does Brisbane's submission to use a gold jumper with a maroon lion (based on the Bears jumper) get rejected by the AFL, but the Crows have their potential option A available to be chosen?