WaynesWorld19
Moderator
- Moderator
- #3,751
Would you prefer him over Moir ?I like him too. Would anyone be unhappy to use 20 on him?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Would you prefer him over Moir ?I like him too. Would anyone be unhappy to use 20 on him?
Absolutely. Doubt DeMattia's there at 20, but you couldn't leave him there if he was.Would you prefer him over Moir ?
Yeah I don’t think anyone will take Demattia in top 15My gut says, we'll take best available at #10 .....a tall / Ruck at #14, given that's likely to be the area to get the pick of the crop .....and maybe a Moir at #20, or another project type
I'll be surprised if we take Demattia
-> 50% to be there at 20 I think …. Pick 16 onwardsAbsolutely. Doubt DeMattia's there at 20, but you couldn't leave him there if he was.
The question put was do we take McAuliffe at 20Absolutely. Doubt DeMattia's there at 20, but you couldn't leave him there if he was.
Rough chance but I reckon the combine testing pushed him up a bitI like Demattia.
Any chance of McAuliffe being available as a rookie?
Holden hillbilly offered his name up as a possible for being there at their pick 118 on the pear board!!The question put was do we take McAuliffe at 20
My ideal draft (as a complete non-expert) would be to get:Rough chance but I reckon the combine testing pushed him up a bit
One of the main ones to benefit
33-45 sounds about right … prob only 55 to be taken max
Yeah, I agree with all of that.For 14? I'd be wanting a drop back of only 2-4 places with a good F2 added in. Alternatively, I would accept a pick in the 30's or 40's this year and an F1 from a side..Pick 14 ain't being traded down for chump change. I'd be looking at 2 very good 2nds for pick 20 on the night (ie one this year and one next)..otherwise, we use the pick ourselves.
It's probably 30/70 as a likelihood. There's some chance that he doesn't feature in the top 55 - but we wouldn't have space for him.I like Demattia.
Any chance of McAuliffe being available as a rookie?
Yeah, I would.I like him too. Would anyone be unhappy to use 20 on him?
He's quite likely for their late picks, I would think.Holden hillbilly offered his name up as a possible for being there at their pick 118 on the pear board!!
on ability, or value?Yeah, I would.
No, we don't have the list spots to trade 20 for those picks, unless we have already traded out to next year say pick 14Yeah, I agree with all of that.
I don't HATE trading 14 for a F1 and trading 20 for two 2023 2nds?
Brisbane's 30 and 39 would become 27 and 33.
Would we do that?
I wouldn't call darcy wilson a B grader.So if there are 4 B/C grade mids at our 1st pick and O’Sullivan you’d rather pick the midfielder ?
That’s odd
A basketball guy that even in basketball terms came from nowhere. Was unheard of through U16 and wasn't until U18's that he made a mark at Div 1 level. Even then, was never in a State team etc...Isn't Goad a basketball convert ....2023 being his first year of playing footy IIRC .....hence why he hasn't rucked
Not sure really. Hard to know what we value. There are a few we have been linked to.Which mid at 10 ?
That’s alot of SA blokes given its one of the worst SA years ever
Do like Goad though
Good.. grab him..Neither would I but he's more an outside mid than an inside mid at this point in time though he's looked OK for the Murray Bushrangers when played on ball on occassions. He's the guy you want patrolling the wing/half forward with his speed, absolute elite endurance and agility, booming kick and a regular goalkicker.
It's not unusual for that to happen .....I wonder if Goad is one of those late growth spurt talls, similar to EnglishA basketball guy that even in basketball terms came from nowhere. Was unheard of through U16 and wasn't until U18's that he made a mark at Div 1 level. Even then, was never in a State team etc...
But why ? .....I mean in any year, you're likely to get a good pick in the mid-20's .....why so dismissive of the pick as if it's a 50's pick ?Not sure really. Hard to know what we value. There are a few we have been linked to.
2 is not a lot - especially if they have talent and upside.
Moir has talent. No doubt. His year was pretty poor really, hence he has slid down enough to be considered in the 20's.
Goad has the size, mobility and upside that is worth looking at.
I'd be happy with both.
I suspect we will only use two draft picks though.
What does this article say about the draft?
He’s more of a flanker or wingerI wouldn't call darcy wilson a B grader.
What I like about him is he played well against the men in those Australia academy games this yearNeither would I but he's more an outside mid than an inside mid at this point in time though he's looked OK for the Murray Bushrangers when played on ball on occassions. He's the guy you want patrolling the wing/half forward with his speed, absolute elite endurance and agility, booming kick and a regular goalkicker.
Why would you label 30 and 39 as becoming 27 and 34? Yes, I get that they come in because of Gold Coast's picks being eaten, but they're being eaten in bids... for players who will push those picks back out. Realistically, there's a minimum of 5 bids coming before 30 and 39, as well as our 20 (three GCS academy, Hawthorn and WB F/S). There's a couple of other academy players floating around (SYD and GCS), both of which could come before their picks.Brisbane's 30 and 39 would become 27 and 33.
Would we do that?