2nd Test Australia v Pakistan Dec 26--30 1000hrs @ the MCG

Who will win?


  • Total voters
    42
  • Poll closed .

Remove this Banner Ad

Disappointed to hear that the Pakistani coach blames DRS for the loss. If the players could catch, and perhaps halve the number of sundries conceded, the third umpire's decisions would have been irrelevant.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Disappointed to hear that the Pakistani coach blames DRS for the loss. If the players could catch, and perhaps halve the number of sundries conceded, the third umpire's decisions would have been irrelevant.
His reactions are getting all the headlines too. Wasnt nearly as controversial as its made out to be.
 
His coach might have carried on like a twit in the presser but Shan Masood’s post match thoughts were exemplary.

He’s one Pakistan player who even without the big score to go with it has very much enhanced his stocks so far in this series. He’s proactive, he’s not tactically amazing but he does try things as a captain and he’s prepared to go for some runs and try some tactics that cost runs to get wickets, he runs hard and looks to turn the strike over and he looks to score quickly in general. I can see how even with his eye catching low average they want a player like him in charge.

His comments about the ground men were first class
 
you can clearly see it hit him in the arm above the wrist band, definitely not out
Where is this vision?

The spike on snicko coupled with the vision makes it look like it probably flicked part of the glove. The hotspot then adds extra evidence by showing a mark. That’s pretty conclusive evidence to suggest it hit the wristband.
 
The Cummins one evened it out and Lyons LBW that was apparently bouncing over lol sure

On SM-S908E using BigFooty.com mobile app

I don’t really have a problem with the Rizwan one, I think it brushed the wristband on the way onto his forearm - I don’t doubt that it hit his arm and he felt it so I can see why he was pissed off but it was out, it took part of the glove.

The Cummins one - I don’t think people are factoring in that the ball was coming back in off the seam from an angle but the camera is looking straight down the wicket. So that frame that shows ‘the gap between bat and ball’ is showing the ball once it has passed the bat.

The only definitive way to show whether there is a gap between bat and ball is to have a camera that lines up perfectly with the angle at which the ball cuts back in toward the batsman and unfortunately they don’t have one.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Where is this vision?

The spike on snicko coupled with the vision makes it look like it probably flicked part of the glove. The hotspot then adds extra evidence by showing a mark. That’s pretty conclusive evidence to suggest it hit the wristband.
Respectfully, Using the words “probably”, “pretty” and “suggest” in a sentence doesnt fill me with confidence that an umpires decision should be overturned.

This sort of debate has been the norm in world football for a decade in the use of technology and various decisions such as offside and handball. It no doubt improves some of the decision making especially where referees are unsighted, however the margins that are being reviewed and debated are so fine and subject to misinterpretation that I personally feel it is going way too far. Yesterday is an example of this IMHO.
 
It’s very very easy to say this from the safety of a lounge room but I’m consistently amazed by the amount of batsmen - specialist ones - who get into a tangle with the short ball and fail to get the bat and gloves out of the vicinity of the ball.


Say what you want about Matthew Wade’s odd method a few years ago against Wagner(?), he wasn’t getting out to it. I appreciate that helmets, the declining standard of playing bouncers has played a part in this sort of thing but the lack of focus on just getting your gloves and bat away from the ball is bizarre
 
Last edited:
It’s very very easy to say this from the safety of a lounge room but I’m consistently amazed by the amount of batsmen - specialist ones - who get into a tangle with the short ball and fail to get the bat and gloves out of the vicinity of the ball.


Say what you want about Matthew Wade’s odd method a few years ago against Wagner(?), he wasn’t getting out to it. I appreciate that helmets, the declining standard of playing bouncers has played a part in this sort of thing but the lack of focus on just getting your gloves and bat away from the ball is bizarre
From the outside it does seem quite incredible. Yes, they have bugger all time to act but these are the top tier best of the best - at least in some teams.
The equipment certainly plays a part, the first instinct seems to be to play much more often than was the case previously. I mean, other than guys like Viv or Greenidge who hooked a lot without helmets. That possibly is a big part of it, a late decision to pull out of a shot that has been begun - whereas many players would have evaded or ducked as the default in the past. It cuts the 0.5 seconds down to perhaps 0.2, not much time to stop an action and effectively take a new one.
 
Hmm a losing Pakistan coach carrying on like a pork chop about "our" umpires. Sounds familiar.


I guess it's funny this time around, given Hafeez only ground out a career in the sport due to the poor worldwide enforcement of cricket's rules (particularly that of Law 21.2).

Not so funny with poor Bob Woolmer, whose propensity to throw out unsubstantiated accusations eventually got him murdered.
 
From the outside it does seem quite incredible. Yes, they have bugger all time to act but these are the top tier best of the best - at least in some teams.
The equipment certainly plays a part, the first instinct seems to be to play much more often than was the case previously. I mean, other than guys like Viv or Greenidge who hooked a lot without helmets. That possibly is a big part of it, a late decision to pull out of a shot that has been begun - whereas many players would have evaded or ducked as the default in the past. It cuts the 0.5 seconds down to perhaps 0.2, not much time to stop an action and effectively take a new one.
There’s a few things to consider with it. Yes there are some obviously poor techniques - but there were back in the day too, plenty of videos of batters looking like a lost puppy to a good bouncer back in the day - that’s why bowlers bowl them. Another thing is fitness - cricketers are generally a lot fitter these days, bowlers can bowl fast and accurately for longer, as such the bouncers bowled should continue to be harder to negotiate. Are batters wise at playing them now than previously? Hard to say in my opinion.
 
Good test. Australia getting to have some real worries with batting. Just not impressed. Pakistan gave themselves a real chance. Really hope they can keep this side together.
Could have been interesting if this game went into a 5th day.Drizzle in the eastern suburbs of Melbourne at 10.45AM and if the same at the MCG they would not be playing at the moment.
 
Could have been interesting if this game went into a 5th day.Drizzle in the eastern suburbs of Melbourne at 10.45AM and if the same at the MCG they would not be playing at the moment.

They'd be regretting all of those extras, a bit of discipline in that area and they would have been right in it.
 
Back
Top