I'd consider it. With pick three your a good chance of finding another high quality player.Danger + 10 for cameron + 3?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'd consider it. With pick three your a good chance of finding another high quality player.Danger + 10 for cameron + 3?
Because people on here criticise our big defenders for their lack of attack/run, which michael provides. Otten is good enough defensively (last week aside) to play second tall to cover michael while he develops a little.If Michael Talia can't crack a game at the Bulldogs, what makes you think he'll make our 22?
Danger + 10 for cameron + 3?
The only thing supporters want is a premiership, if nobes thinks trading danger is best for the club in its pursuit of a premiership then I say go for it, by the way I would take danger + pick 10 for Cameron and pick 3 in a heart beat.All this talk of trading Danger?
Why would you trade him ever? For fear of losing him? That is just plain nuts.
There is no other player like him in the comp - and if you want to upset just about every young crows supporter we have, then go ahead.
He is gold on and off the field.
Forget it. Never.
I'd love to lure Cameron, but not for Danger - not for Sloane - not for Crouch - not for Talia. If we become one of those clubs that trades away it's heart and soul then pity for us all.
All this talk of trading Danger?
Why would you trade him ever? For fear of losing him? That is just plain nuts.
There is no other player like him in the comp - and if you want to upset just about every young crows supporter we have, then go ahead.
He is gold on and off the field.
Forget it. Never.
I'd love to lure Cameron, but not for Danger - not for Sloane - not for Crouch - not for Talia. If we become one of those clubs that trades away it's heart and soul then pity for us all.
At the very least it may be a chance to put Danger to the sword this trade period - his extension needs to be done or traded out IMO. Otherwise the whole FA BS is going to pollute our 2015 and if he goes we get a draft pick and that's it.The only thing supporters want is a premiership, if nobes thinks trading danger is best for the club in its pursuit of a premiership then I say go for it, by the way I would take danger + pick 10 for Cameron and pick 3 in a heart beat.
IMO you do if said fabric and soul actually won't commit with FA on the horizon.spot on you dont trade away the fabric, heart and soul of the club
thank god many posters on here dont make list management decsions
IMO you do if said fabric, heart and soul actually won't commit with FA on the horizon.spot on you dont trade away the fabric, heart and soul of the club
thank god many posters on here dont make list management decsions
Agree 100 %, people are going to say trading danger early out of fear of him leaving is ridiculous but receiving pick 14 or 15 next year is what's ridiculous especially if we could potentially get the next Wayne Carey instead.At the very least it may be a chance to put Danger to the sword this trade period - his extension needs to be done or traded out IMO. Otherwise the whole FA BS is going to pollute our 2015 and if he goes we get a draft pick and that's it.
Clubs need to take back a bit of power, especially at the top end
Agree 100 %, people are going to say trading danger early out of fear of him leaving is ridiculous but receiving pick 14 or 15 next year is what's ridiculous especially if we could potentially get the next Wayne Carey instead.At the very least it may be a chance to put Danger to the sword this trade period - his extension needs to be done or traded out IMO. Otherwise the whole FA BS is going to pollute our 2015 and if he goes we get a draft pick and that's it.
Clubs need to take back a bit of power, especially at the top end
Mark Robinson reckons Frawley is off to Collingwood.
spot on you dont trade away the fabric, heart and soul of the club
thank god many posters on here dont make list management decsions
or texAll this talk of trading Danger?
Why would you trade him ever? For fear of losing him? That is just plain nuts.
There is no other player like him in the comp - and if you want to upset just about every young crows supporter we have, then go ahead.
He is gold on and off the field.
Forget it. Never.
I'd love to lure Cameron, but not for Danger - not for Sloane - not for Crouch - not for Talia. If we become one of those clubs that trades away it's heart and soul then pity for us all.
give your self an uppercutTex for Cameron.
Head says yes. Heart says....
I'm happier than he re-signedHenderson resigned until 2017
Where is the dislike post button...Danger + 10 for cameron + 3?
WTF is up with you tonight?Tex for Cameron.
Head says yes. Heart says....
Where is the dislike post button...
1. Danger would have no interest going to GWS - none, nix.
2. Danger has made it clear he want success. IMO he will stay as that type of guy (no Tippett or Gunston), but if he were to move it would be home to Geelong.
3. Danger still has 1.5 years of his contract left, yet the paranoia panic on this board wanting him to sign now. IMO, he will re-sign with us long-term within the next 6 months - there is no rush as he is not in the last year of his contract.
You just don't trade players like Dangerfield who are a key fabric of the club as it causes massive collateral damage.
Fair deal though?
Yes, I better clarify this. Danger is the type of character who wouldn't move club unless he didn't think his club had much future of winning a flag. The other 2 didn't need much convincing to move!I don't quite see how these two haven't moved to more successful clubs? I don't think Danger is looking to go anywhere either - but your logic got lost on me there somewhere