Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Still argue it doesn't have to be predominantly white. Unless they only want 1 clash top.
Richmond could have a pink top - that would stop all clashes with teams they clash with.
True, at least one clash strip that will work to avoid a clash against any potential team.
Also,
Would look just smclashing against WCE's navy and yellowRichmond could have the VFL Yellow clash jumper as the away jumper, and wear that on black (not yellow) shorts. And then a white jumper as their clash.
Fair point.I said as away jumper, Richmond would have to wear a white clash jumper against West Coast.
We're assuming West Coast will be wearing the wings in 2015, are we not?Would look just smclashing against WCE's navy and yellow
Would solve a lot of issuesWe're assuming West Coast will be wearing the wings in 2015, are we not?
....fine, 2016 it is.They won't.
You could have said the same thing for Hawthorn, before they brought in the brown jumper.Fair point.
I'd be all for that.
Richmond struggle to have two jumpers though - can't see them physically being able to have three!
I don't think they should though. Front is nearly all charcoalCarlton did.
..
The Collingwood-Brisbane one could actually have Brisbane in royal shorts if they had them, I reckon.Ideally in both the above matches, home side (Pies and Roos) should wear White shorts, as they have more white on their jumper.
Shame common sense doesn't apply to these decisions.
Richmond could have the VFL Yellow clash jumper as the away jumper, and wear that on black (not yellow) shorts. And then a white jumper as their clash.