1. Rove needs to play the straight bat. No chat to camera. No piss takes.
2. I would love to enter.
3. But i am not that fit.
2. I would love to enter.
3. But i am not that fit.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's Channel 10 - of course they will.Hopefully Channel 10 don't **** this up.
I whole heartedly agree but theoretically if done right, having it on multiple nights a week could be a good thing. Imagine if it was three nights with the first show being the reaction to the tribal, plus a proper explanation of why people voted for they did, plus a reward challenge and reward, the second episode being the immunity challenge and a lot of strategy shown, and the third episode being a bit of strategy, and then a long tribal, that would actually be good.
Instead we'll get stupid twists, redemption Island duels and manufactured drama
Anyone remember the 1st Australian survivor, and the first immunity challenge was an epic fail with the flames on the wood pile not reaching high enough to burn through the rope because the wind was so strong? Felt embarrassed just watching it...
I'm still dark on Nine for not showing season 4 of real Survivor I ******* loved Survivor back then.
What bright spark suggested country South Australia... "We got to do this ultra cheap. Kerry Packer knows a property owner, in a place it gets cold and windy? Okay whatever that'll do."
24 sucks. Means that most of the contestants won't get any decent airtime. Why the hell can't the show just work off what American Survivior did well? Surely a show that has 30 seasons is doing something right? But no. We have to have a three night a week show that moves at a snails pace.24 doesn't bother me too much. Actually allows for some interesting tribe configurations. Do you go 2 of 12, 3 of 8 or 4 of 6?
FMD - 24 contestants? Other things they could do to **** it up:
1. Exile Island
2. Surprise mid-season entry of 'intruders' (I almost guarantee this will happen)
3. Using aussie 'celebrities' as contestants
4. Setting it somewhere cold. One of the best things about Survivor is that you get to see a bit of gratuitous flesh. The previous Aus version was so s**t because it was always so ******* cold and they were always rugged up. No need to get Mr Fuzzy pen out in the edit.
Keep us updated The Sultan
I'm guessing the cash prize will be a couple hundred grand. No where near a million.
Will do..
no mention of how much the prize money will be, from memory was $500k in the Aussie survivor they did years ago.
Marquesas was the only one they missed.I still love Survivor now. (And yes agree with you re. not showing some of the seasons). It's The Amazing Race i have gone right off, same old same old it is to me.
Sure, but that format is not particularly popular in Australia.24 sucks. Means that most of the contestants won't get any decent airtime. Why the hell can't the show just work off what American Survivior did well? Surely a show that has 30 seasons is doing something right? But no. We have to have a three night a week show that moves at a snails pace.
Couldn't possibly be worse than the version Channel Nein did years ago, set at Whalers Way near Port Lincoln.