i seriously think cm35 has 'personal' issues with woja.
come on, dude, share yer pain. a problem shared is a problem halved.
come on, dude, share yer pain. a problem shared is a problem halved.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
jules101 said:Depends who for wouldn't it? Ablett for J Brown?
Yes you would. As much as I love Chappy I would have to thank him for being a great player for us and wish him farewell!I wouldn't want to give up Chapman for Browny though.
scottydeewah said:Yes you would. As much as I love Chappy I would have to thank him for being a great player for us and wish him farewell!
The thing that is funny about this thread, getting back to the original topic.
- Essendon fans coming out with ***** like. "He is not what we need". What a f*cking joke, so good players are now not what they need. And this crap like "we need a pacy midfielder..." - sure like one player will fix your list. DELUDED!
- Leaving Geelong because of no success. Then why would you go to Essendon? Okay so we are not going to good but we have the list to turn it around next year, sort of like Adelaide, WC, Melbourne etc etc. Essendon though? No the bombers are f*Cked for at LEAST two more years to come.
jules101 said:You are an idiot. If Essendon can't get the ball into the forward line how will Chapman help. I was having a nice discussion with you blokes so i am not sure why you are acting like a little kid who had his lollies taken away from him, geez I stated that Chapman is a good player but we have the Chapman type player. Essendon do not need a small forward. Essendon forward line has and never will be the problem. our problem is our midfield. So yes we need a pacy midfielder. No one player will nto fix our list however a fast midfielder who can get the ball out of the center and kick it on to lloyd's chest will sure help.
Who said that Chapman was going to leave because of no success?
And I hate to tell you Scottydeewah that you should be in the top 8 this year with the list you have. Time is running out for a premiership.
darren forssman said:chapman would be a better midfielder than kelly, tougher, better disposal and knows how to kick a goal.
jules101 said:Then why doesn't Geelong play him there?
He did last Friday Night, and he killed your mob doing it.jules101 said:Then why doesn't Geelong play him there?
DBAH0 said:He did last Friday Night, and he killed your mob doing it.
He was also picking up possesions at half back, and spent a lot more time in the midfield then he normally would.jules101 said:He was a forward who drifted back. not a midfielder
DBAH0 said:He was also picking up possesions at half back, and spent a lot more time in the midfield then he normally would.
To say Essendon don't need him is a complete joke.
Jack-Packenham said:Because Bomber overates the ability of Ling, Enright and Kelly.
chapmanmagic35 said:Ling has been our best player over the past four years with Scarlett...
You have a short memory...
chapmanmagic35 said:Ling has been our best player over the past four years with Scarlett...
You have a short memory...
darren forssman said:ling also did well in the beep test, just like spriggs did. and their disposal is the same, terrible.
he doesnt belong in the midfield, its accepting mediocrity to keep him there because he has "been our best player over the past four years".
chapmanmagic35 said:Don't even dare compare Spriggs to Ling...
Were you on another planet when Ling was dominating in the middle?
You are a different one...defend Wojcinski and criticise Ling...