Eddie Betts vs Luke Bruest

Who is Better? Betts or Bruest

  • Eddie Betts

    Votes: 24 30.8%
  • Luke Bruest

    Votes: 54 69.2%

  • Total voters
    78

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

For over 4 years, oh ok.



In the toughest position in the game, what makes it even harder is he gets the number 1 small defender every game, no disrespect to Breust but he has never had that problem.
The only player that beat Nick Smith last year was Breust.
You do know Rioli missed a large chunk of last year? Who do you think the best small defender went to?
 
For over 4 years, oh ok.



In the toughest position in the game, what makes it even harder is he gets the number 1 small defender every game, no disrespect to Breust but he has never had that problem.

You mustn't rate AA defender Nick Smith then.

Bruest Had him multiple times last year, and spanked him. Only person in the comp to do so.
 
Betts is only behind Milne as the best long term player in that role of recent times. Breust has had pretty extraordinary results so early in his career though and is the better player at this point in time with the potential to have had the better overall career by the time he's done.
 
Stats, what stats are you talking bout exactly?

Yes, Puopolo may not always get the number 1 small D but EB does.

Puopolo doesn't get the best small defender, as he's a defensive forward himself. The best small defender goes to Breust, especially when Rioli is in the stands.

Eddie Betts got towelled by Angus Litherland in 2014, and he's 192cm. Duryea went elsewhere. So there goes the theory that Eddie gets the best small defender each week.

Saying Paul Puopolo gets the best small defender is akin to saying I have never watched Hawthorn play football.
 
Eddie Betts cruely underrated
 
Back
Top