- Nov 14, 2010
- 42,236
- 46,468
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
That’s why we love himAt least Sheezel will put his head over the pill
Does both the tough and classy stuff
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That’s why we love himAt least Sheezel will put his head over the pill
Can genuinely play all over the parkThat’s why we love him
Does both the tough and classy stuff
I can see Toby Pink fulfilling the defensive GOAT request
Didn’t back down from the 110kg McKay charging at him last year, copped a big hit tooAt least Sheezel will put his head over the pill
You will have a dozen young, top 20 players on your list.
You think they will all be happy to earn average money cos of the kulcha ?
Watch us.
As i have said b4, losing players to cap isn't something we have faced. Also cap will get bigger after tasmania comes in.
You dont think the 7 year contracts include sections on cap increases ?
7 year and long term deals in general are used for front and back loading.
The reality of our current cap space is, Sheezel will likely be on a draftee salary for the second half of his current deal.
I'd say he will be one of the higher paid players in the comp this season.
You dont think the 7 year contracts include sections on cap increases ?
There is a reason why him, larkey got given 5 year extensions on existing contract.
Ahh yes, one of those sour puss types.Desperation.
very well said7 year and long term deals in general are used for front and back loading.
The reality of our current cap space is, Sheezel will likely be on a draftee salary for the second half of his current deal.
I'd say he will be one of the higher paid players in the comp this season.
Ahh yes, one of those sour puss types.
Only West Coast would want to be the Roos.
There is no jealousy here.
Fantastic rebuild going at your end eyyy, minus the good players and all
Not every team celebrates tanking the way you guys do.
Also, maybe win something then have an ego.
Still a very young 2nd year player, has massive upsideMore of the same from Sheezel today.
Impactful in the first qtr when he played 50/50 def/fwd and moved up the ground. Was involved in multiple scoring chains, inside 50s and had a shot at goal but shanked it. Was looking genuinely dangerous and a part of why North burst out of the blocks.
After the first qtr, basically no play forward of centre and no impact on the play or Norths ability to score.
Think he had 5 scoring involvements in the first qtr and 6 for the match.
Shows that when he gets forward of centre, he impacts the game.
Got a ton of the ball in the last 3 qtrs but essentially had no impact on the game after qtr time.
If he’s going to stay down back, North need him playing like he did in that first qtr and not the rest of the game getting easy possessions deep.
Looking a genuine game winner in the first and then seagulled the next three qtrs without impact.
Not every team celebrates tanking the way you guys do.
Also, maybe win something then have an ego.
Logue is a perfect match up for Curnow and J Cameron and has soundly beaten both of them before.Let’s not be facetious, Logue is a chance though
“Defender wins against forward making him the GOAT”Logue is a perfect match up for Curnow and J Cameron and has soundly beaten both of them before.
Calm down mate I’m just saying he’s a decent defender in response to a comment clearly made in jest. I’m sure the AFL aren’t going to read my post and take Charlie’s Colemans away.“Defender wins against forward making him the GOAT”
Logue couldn’t tie Charlie or Jezza’s bootlaces