The Law LIBOR Scandal Again Points to Systemic Corruption in International Banking System

[Long Live HFC]

ok, maybe im being unfair and presumptuous re where you're coming from, so i'll point just one issue with the "doco".

one of, if a not the premise of the film is that the world is controlled by privately-owned central banks that have forced themselves onto the populace around the whole world. in that nice place called reality, central banks are part of their respective governments. sure, we can talk about all kinds of caveats like the US' unique public-private structure, or the fact libya uses another county's central bank (yemen's? i forget) as its own but i don't see that as meaningful within the context of the doco's 3 hours of doom and gloom.

my question to you is: if documentary cannot even get such basic facts right, what does this tell you about its academic or scholarly quality? how can you trust anything it says? and who can be bothered chasing down every last allegation for more than 3 hours of bollocks?

now, i don't expect any doco to be perfect or to agree with everything it says. i am more than happy to cut them slack for anything i might feel is an honest mistake, or working with the best information available at the time (or simply a difference of opinion). such claims as the one i just addressed above are dishonest, wrong, and help fill the world with shitty information. it pisses me off.

 

[Max zero]

(2 years later - thanks to the thread bumper...)
But the top 20% own 85%+ of the financial assets. Of course they are going to pay the most tax.

70% of the total tax is a cheap deal for them.

The 80% of people who own 15% or less of the financial assets pay 30% of the tax.

It's a rort by the rich.

The poor also get the majority of government assistance. I am not saying being poor is good but on a per person basis they recieve a lot more from the government then they give.

 

[Chief]

The poor also get the majority of government assistance. I am not saying being poor is good but on a per person basis they recieve a lot more from the government then they give.

In the USA? You think?

 

[CountryRace]

ok, maybe im being unfair and presumptuous re where you're coming from, so i'll point just one issue with the "doco".

one of, if a not the premise of the film is that the world is controlled by privately-owned central banks that have forced themselves onto the populace around the whole world. in that nice place called reality, central banks are part of their respective governments. sure, we can talk about all kinds of caveats like the US' unique public-private structure, or the fact libya uses another county's central bank (yemen's? i forget) as its own but i don't see that as meaningful within the context of the doco's 3 hours of doom and gloom.

my question to you is: if documentary cannot even get such basic facts right, what does this tell you about its academic or scholarly quality? how can you trust anything it says? and who can be bothered chasing down every last allegation for more than 3 hours of bollocks?

now, i don't expect any doco to be perfect or to agree with everything it says. i am more than happy to cut them slack for anything i might feel is an honest mistake, or working with the best information available at the time (or simply a difference of opinion). such claims as the one i just addressed above are dishonest, wrong, and help fill the world with shitty information. it pisses me off.

Thank you for attempting to reply in a proper manner as opposed to your first posts.

http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2014-09-26/the-secret-goldman-sachs-tapes

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=washingtonstory&sid=aGq2B3XeGKok

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=a7484bxHz7Bk











https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0I2fRcFPzu4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iYZM58dulPE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5IJeemTQ7Vk

http://www.amazon.com/End-Fed-Ron-Paul/dp/0446549193/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1403992810&sr=8-1&keywords=end the fed

http://www.corbettreport.com/federalreserve/

http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,764913,00.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iP9H5fADC0E

http://www.forbes.com/sites/periann...congressman-in-favor-of-rand-pauls-fed-audit/

http://www.rollingstone.com/politic...ed-the-biggest-financial-scandal-yet-20130425

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2013...s-are-private-except-the-american-people.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=szv0GEdRCOM&feature=youtu.be

Documentaries:

• The Money Masters - http://www.themoneymasters.com/
• The Secret of Oz - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6cq9yEVcGIU
• Jekyll Island: The Truth Behind the Federal Reserve - http://www.jekyllisland-themovie.com/
• Watch now: http://indeechannel.com/watch/jekyll-island/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Off-balance-sheet

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dyO4q3C4f_s

 

[Long Live HFC]

lol yeah, i knew i shouldn't have given you the benefit of the doubt. you're a conspiracy nutjob. grow up.

 

[CountryRace]

lol yeah, i knew i shouldn't have given you the benefit of the doubt. you're a conspiracy nutjob. grow up.

Yes everything is as it seems. There are no powerful groups pulling the strings. Go back to sleep.

The LIBOR scandal never happened.

 

[CountryRace]

The problem imo is the entire system, the entire world is choking from too much debt yet every dollar ever created is debt, so it cant be any other way

http://www.economist.com/content/global_debt_clock

current world debt 55 trillion

who is the debt owned to

 

[Long Live HFC]

Yes everything is as it seems. There are no powerful groups pulling the strings. Go back to sleep.

you peanuts always sound the same, haha. i saw you described recently as having an "aliens vs. super villains" comic book view of the world. god it's ******* boring hearing the same banal claims from each new generation of internet super sleuths, alongside the same throwaway remarks about sheeple, being asleep, shills or disinfo agents. god you're unoriginal.

 

[CountryRace]

http://www.scribd.com/doc/46627723/...cy-and-Housing-House-of-Representative#scribd

http://www.save-a-patriot.org/files/view/whofed.html

 

[Long Live HFC]

the stupid. it burns. it's like you can't read or something.

sure, we can talk about all kinds of caveats like the US' unique public-private structure, or the fact libya uses another county's central bank (yemen's? i forget) as its own but i don't see that as meaningful within the context of the doco's 3 hours of doom and gloom.

FYI i already know all about the structure of the fed, who owns it, and what that actually means. feel free to address my original post any time!

 

[Max zero]

In the USA? You think?

Even in the USA. No question that the US is stuffed but you would be hard pressed to argue that the majority of government spending does not tend to go to the lowest end of the wealth scale.

Again I am not saying that's a bad thing (its quite logical after all) or that it is better to be poor then rich but simply saying that its fairly self evident that the majority of government spending will be for the poorest in society. Even in a shithole like the US.

 

[CountryRace]

the stupid. it burns. it's like you can't read or something.



FYI i already know all about the structure of the fed, who owns it, and what that actually means. feel free to address my original post any time!

http://iamthewitness.com/books/Eustace.Mullins/The World Order.pdf

 

[Long Live HFC]

hahahahahahahaha. any other holocaust deniers you wanna quote?

 

[CountryRace]

hahahahahahahaha. any other holocaust deniers you wanna quote?

The anti Semitic line from a shill

How unoriginal

Does it matter if he is the queen of England, James Hird or a black lesbian Muslim? If so why?

Why not play the ball and not the man.

Read the book and explain to us dear plebs why you are right.

Could be some of your nest Shillery if you give it a good crack

 

[Long Live HFC]

The anti Semitic line from a shill

How unoriginal

who said anything about anti semites? he's a holocaust denier. I don't know why he denies the holocaust, so I didn't mention it. just pointing out the credibility of your source for you, as you're an ignoramus and have NFI who you're quoting.

 

[CountryRace]

who said anything about anti semites? he's a holocaust denier. I don't know why he denies the holocaust, so I didn't mention it. just pointing out the credibility of your source for you, as you're an ignoramus and have NFI who you're quoting.

Who gives a rats toss bag if he is a moon landing denier

Does that mean nothing he says can be creditable?

How does the logic work: if one is not infallible, one cannot talk?

10 seconds ago you stated the international business times (overall, in regards to essentially the same subject) Was wrong. Hence your creditability is non existent. And yet you are allowed to continue speaking.


Goering was a prick and a nazi. And yet he still said stuff th at was truthful occasionally.TRY and play the ball and no the man.

Buttercup.

 

[Long Live HFC]

Does that mean nothing he says can be creditable?

no, but it sure calls into question his rationality and credibility. and in my experience (much vaster than yours), if you're a crank you're a crank, no matter the topic.

10 seconds ago you stated the international business times (overall, in regards to essentially the same subject) Was wrong. Hence your creditability is non existent. And yet you are allowed to continue speaking.

yeah, because a news site never got anything wrong before, lol. you too would realise they were wrong if you knew anything about how the world actually worked. but you don't.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/conspiracy/malaysiapatent.asp

well done for (once again) believing everything you read on the internet because it confirms your biases. you're a cretinous sheep of the highest order.

 

[CountryRace]

who said anything about anti semites? he's a holocaust denier. I don't know why he denies the holocaust, so I didn't mention it. just pointing out the credibility of your source for you, as you're an ignoramus and have NFI who you're quoting.

To further elaborate everyone seems to like the quote

“To determine the true rulers of any society, all you must do is ask yourself this question: Who is it that I am not permitted to criticize?”

When it has the words Voltaire next to it. In reality it s said by a w***er pedofile. However this doesn't mean it is any less true.

 

[CountryRace]

Yes dear, when in doubt run to your demigods barb and David mikkleson. The infallible Canadians.

Read the book I dare you.

Even if a naughty man wrote it

 

[Long Live HFC]

In reality it s said by a ****** pedofile.

LOL! paedophiles may be sick *s but I am unaware of any association between paedophilia and impediments to higher functioning thought. so the fact a paedophile said that has no relevance at all.

take a few classes in logic, kid.

 

[CountryRace]

LOL! paedophiles may be sick ****s but I am unaware of any association between paedophilia and impediments to higher functioning thought. so the fact a paedophile said that has no relevance at all.

take a few classes in logic, kid.

Holocaust deniers lack creditability

Neo nazi pedos function well...


You might have to explain that to me again, as I have not quite comes to terms with the universal 'who is, who is not creditable in the eyes of master shill llhfc

So far I think it's good; snopes.com, pedos

Bad: international business times, holocaust deniers

 

[CountryRace]

no, you're too ******* slow.

You have just said:

author mullins , an apparently holocaust denier must be dismissed, without reading his book, due to a lack of creditability


Seconds latter, you have said


It does not matter if one is a neo nazi pedo, strom. One in this situation can still be creditable





You level of Shillery is dropping. Shame angel cakes.

 

[CountryRace]

I come for the discussion, I stay for CountryRace's butchering of the English language

i may not speak english good, but i am excellent at shagging sheep

 

[CountryRace]

again, you're too ******* thick to understand what I actually said, kid.

I am unaware of any association between paedophilia and impediments to higher functioning thought.

no, but it sure calls into question his rationality and credibility.

 

[clogged]

i may not speak english good, but i am excellent at shagging sheep

Not at all surprised.