- Dec 22, 2009
- 62,725
- 36,774
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Matildas/Socceroos/LFC/MVFC/RCStrasbourg
http://www.nst.com.my/node/20925?d=1
Yesterday, theNew Straits Timesquoted experts who had said that photographs of the blast fragmentation patterns on the fuselage of the airliner showed two distinct shapes — the shredding pattern associated with a warhead packed with “flechettes”, and the more uniform, round-type penetration holes consistent with that of cannon rounds.
...
Parry also cited a July 29 Canadian Broadcasting Corporation interview with Michael Bociurkiw, one of the first Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) investigators to arrive at the scene of the disaster, near Donetsk.
...
“It had to have been a hail of bullets from both sides that brought the plane down. This is Haisenko’s main discovery. You can’t have projectiles going in both directions — into the left-hand-side fuselage panel from both its left and right sides — unless they are coming at the panel from different directions.
“Nobody before Haisenko had noticed that the projectiles had ripped through that panel from both its left side and its right side. This is what rules out any ground-fired missile,” Parry had said.
If the range is 48km then why couldn't it have been fired from non rebel held territory? How many km inside rebel territory was in when it was hit?
A simple Internet search reveals that Hrabove (where the plane crashed) is 80km East of Donetsk which is controlled by the rebels. So there is absolutely no doubt the missile was fired from rebel held territory.
The buk SA-11 warheads are filled with up to 30,000 pieces of metal shrapnel. When the missile explodes they are designed to shred the target. A cursory glance at any of the crash scene photos will show you holes in the fuselage of many different shapes, sizes and angles. That doesn't happen from gunfire and there isn't even so called fighters on russian radar evidence, just falling wreckage if mh 17 itself.