- Oct 30, 2010
- 5,547
- 4,365
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
but i don't think it fits
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is all just incorrect, Maidan was very violent, there are video's of the Berkut being burnt by Molotov cocktails, in some cases fatally. There were rooftop snipers, shooting people on both sides, something which has not been satisfactorily investigated, there was a bloke Called Musychko (sp?) going around filming himself and his band of Right Sektor thugs beating up bureaucrats, there was the heavenly hundred Martyrs who became the sacricial lambs of the new regime. Video's of what happened when the maidan crew tried it in the East show the numbers were with the rebels. I can provide the videos if you like but this is the wrong thread I've been told. So I'll leave it at that.i'd suggest there's qualitative differences though between the putsch and the rebellion (while obviously accepting that one led to the other). the putsch succeeded through sheer weight of numbers rather than violence (as i alluded above, when you have the numbers you don't need the guns). subsequent to that there were free elections, which any ukrainian could participate in. IF you're going to overthrow your government then the maidan revolution could be considered a blueprint of how to go about it.
i don't feel that any of the actions of the rebels really displays anything approaching legitimacy. they don't have the numbers, but they have the guns. they shot down a passenger plane. their masters concocted fanciful nonsense in order to avoid accepting responsibility. they do not appear to have any civil organisation whatsosever. etc etc.
i don't feel it's a question of 'deferral to authority' as we're talking about states (or the creation of them) and this is implicitly a concept of authority.
This is all just incorrect, Maidan was very violent, there are video's of the Berkut being burnt by Molotov cocktails, in some cases fatally.
yeah, I believe the US Navy espsecially when they are wargaming up the east coast in the early 1990s
If it's a military craft it's potentially dangerous and therefore a legitimate target in a war zone unless displaying the Red Cross/Red Crescent. Troop ships in themselves aren't dangerous... but what they can carry IS.
Sorry I could find no such posts in this thread and it still kind of ignores the fact that the real turning point of the protests was the violence, the nostalgia of the nationalists confirms this, unfortunately/fortunately most of their propaganda celebrating their key role in the putsch has been removed from facebook as it was accompanied by anti-semitic and anti-homosexual propaganda, so its difficult to quote. They know they were vital to the regime change, and they believe they can cause another regime change if they will it, and thats why Dmtri Yarosh the leader of the right sektor has been promoted to the general staff and generally these ultra-nationalist volunteers have been absorbed into the national guard and Armed forces. Now they are invested in the success of the regime, although it means the regime has become them also.you've ignored multiple posts i've made only today, where i noted that there was violence. why?
clearly it is a relative statement/comparison. the number of those killed on the plane alone outnumber those killed in the putsch (who were mainly protestors). compare it to syria or libya and other recent coups/attempts and i stand by what i said.
it still kind of ignores the fact that the real turning point of the protests was the violence, the nostalgia of the nationalists confirms this, unfortunately/fortunately most of their propaganda celebrating their key role in the putsch has been removed from facebook as it was accompanied by anti-semitic and anti-homosexual propaganda, so its difficult to quote. They know they were vital to the regime change, and they believe they can cause another regime change if they will it, and thats why Dmtri Yarosh the leader of the right sektor has been promoted to the general staff and generally these ultra-nationalist volunteers have been absorbed into the national guard and Armed forces. Now they are invested in the success of the regime, although it means the regime has become them also.
They will be problematic though, as a semi-facist regime is not going to be easily integrated into the EU and the Russian people will never turn against a leader who can convincingly claim to be fighting fascists from the west.
This is my commentry based on my following the crisis from multiple perspectives, in this case my opinion is informed by following the social media of "Traditional Nationalists of Ukraine" and the "Azov Reconquista". The first site recently was removed from facebook and has been reborn in the last week or so here -https://www.facebook.com/ukrcrusadeCan you reply with anything that isn't Russian propaganda?
This is my commentry based on my following the crisis from multiple perspectives, in this case my opinion is informed by following the social media of "Traditional Nationalists of Ukraine" and the "Azov Reconquista". The first site recently was removed from facebook and has been reborn in the last week or so here -https://www.facebook.com/ukrcrusade
It was not me who diverted the thread, I was replying to other posters. Why are you so concerned any way? Do you go around to every thread moaning about diversions? at least this discussion is only slightly off original topic.Can you keep posts in here MH-17 related by any chance?
Lol I'll take your whinging as a lack of ability to effectively counter any of my points.No I don't. There is am actual thread for your wild ramblings though. Might help to use it.
Lol I'll take your whinging as a lack of ability to effectively counter any of my points.
Sorry Mr Cheney, I really would like to but there is really very little point debating with you, when there is no continuity. However I will take up your challenge if I must.No Vlad. Just want to keep the MH17 discussion about... MH17. It really isn't difficult. Take your political ravings to the civil war thread where I will discuss them with you.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ling-230-hit-explosions-OUTSIDE-aircraft.htmlyeah, I believe the US Navy espsecially when they are wargaming up the east coast in the early 1990s
I bet they have precedents to refer to where the USA or Israel have protected their military or agents. Doesn't make it any better but it does show how what goes around comes around.
Battle lines drawn many years ago I would of thought?
To be honest that egotistical strelkov should be the one to pay if it's proven that it was the rebels. Taking him down may have repercussions among the Russian far right, we shall see I guess.Not quite sure what you are alluding to. Malaysia & the Netherlands want a UN tribunal to prosecute those who are responsible for MH17's demise. I'm not aware of any previous "battle lines" between Russia and these 2 countries. Netherlands lost nearly 200 citizens & Malaysia's PM lost his mother in law in the tragedy. Naturally they want justice and Russia needs to help out in every way possible to make this happen even if it is counterproductive to their political goals in Ukraine.
If Russia took military action inside Ukraine's borders, you would have no doubt. Russia would of kicked Ukraine's arse 3 ways until Sunday by now if that was the case!Russians do not support a UN tribunal to charge suspects involved in the war crime committed against MH17 organised by Netherlands & Malaysia (the two countries that lost most our of the tragedy).
If anyone had a single iota of doubt about the guilt of the Russians this absolutely confirms these scumbags are responsible
Russia have no interest in helping with the arrest of those responsible for this reprehensible act. What absolute scum, protecting those who are guilty because they do not want to be found to have taken military action inside Ukranian borders.