Not all of us our speculating that 'he enjoyed the attention after Hughes died'.
The more extreme the conclusion, the more evidence required to support it.
You're offering an extreme conclusion, with zero evidence.
So who's to judge what's extreme and what isn't? And how much extra evidence to do I need? And as I said I have no evidence this is what I believe.
Speak for yourself. But, in light of that, maybe those assertions should be tempered.
Well I have an opinion, an assertion, a train of thought, whatever you want to call it, and I'm going to express it, that's bad luck for you.
You're offering more than an opinion. You're making a statement about Clarke's motivations following Hughes' death.
You're saying something really ugly that's not based on anything.
I didn't say anything about his motivation, i just said that I believe he enjoyed the attention. Again, you're more than welcome to have a cry if you don't agree.