But the great thing about our side this year as 'Frankencow' has stated is our depth, because I am unsure if it was Doveton's best side playing on the weekend, but it was our 'C - Grade' side.. there was about 10+ guys who played against doveton who wouldn't be in our best 22!.. and to still beat doveton which we saw as a danger game was great result for us.
And yes it was us asking to play more teams in the comp.. especially the reserves comp.. we have TOO many players.. literally almost 20 guys miss out each week.. and I would hate to be a guy not in our best 22 come round 12 when the rotation policy stops..
This (on another thread) confirmed that it was Mount the SFL Chairman was referring too when saying the SFL had been approached by a club about fielding more than 2 sides, possibly 4, next year. Interested to hear thoughts on how this should work?
It's obviously great Mount has those numbers, but how would you want your club to approach this? Pick four sides on ability, having the best to in the ones, next two in the twos? Should the SFL treat them as two separate teams (as in two different lots of ones and twos) with two separate lists? I think there should be some sort of safeguard in place to stop Mount transferring players between teams depending on the opposition, and what if they played finals against each other?
My ideal solution would be to give Mount two Div 2 teams (ones and twos) and the same in Div 3. If Mount keep going this way, they might get to Div 2 regardless.