News New Jumpers for 2022

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Please lets keep discussion to actual confirmations, legitimate news items and credible leaks only. Remember that any of your own design ideas do not belong in this thread, but are to go in the Jumper Ideas thread.

A change will not be considered to be confirmed until it has either been announced by the club or leaked by a retailer.

If you do come across some information, please make sure to post your sources with any confirmed releases, and clearly state any rumours or leaks.

Cheers, and enjoy!

REMINDER: TROLLS WHO DELIBERATELY POST FALSE OR MISLEADING INFORMATION WILL BE CARDED



​
Adelaide
New Rear Sponsor - TBA (Replacing Optus) - Confirmed 28/8/21.


Brisbane Lions


Carlton


Collingwood
New Rear Sponsor - TBA (Replacing CGU) - Confirmed 9/2/21; Source.


Essendon


Fremantle


Geelong


Gold Coast


Greater Western Sydney


Hawthorn


Melbourne


North Melbourne
New Manufacturer - Puma - Confirmed 28/10/21; Source.
New home jumper - return to white base - Rumoured; Source.
New away/clash jumper - rumoured to be Bounding Roo; Source.


Port Adelaide


Richmond
New Front Sponsor - nib (moves from back to front) - Confirmed 18/10/21; Source.
New Back Sponsor - Latitude - Confirmed 5/11/20; Source.


St Kilda


Sydney


West Coast


Western Bulldogs

​
​
 
Last edited:
The taipan said:
No! If you are aware of the st kilda Facebook post they had towards the end of the year asking members and supporters about their favourite jumper/clash there were 2 clear winners……. There is also a tweak to the home jumper that will keep a lot of people happy also
Click to expand...
I just had a look at that post and yellow was definitely the overwhelming favourite.
 
acm21 said:
If it was posted in the last 24 hours it was either taken down or was an old pair (isc and cgu branding). I dont believe the players will get any new gear until day 1 of pre season which hasn't started (which is why it's been quiet).
Click to expand...
it was nike x Collingwood shorts with a white trim at the back. it was new as I have every nike x pies item since its release in January.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

DylanK said:
View attachment 1274330
I believe you’re referring to these ISC shorts.
Click to expand...
images
 
Yeah so I reckon you can pretty much take it to the bank that its Hungry Jacks sponsoring the Crows, just reading between many lines.

If so, and assuming they take both spots, hopefully they do the buns logo above the number and go with just the text for below the number. That full square logo that West Coast had for a bit was terrible!

Regardless, it’ll be a sad day losing a text only sponsor from the back. Only a single one-off game in 2009 has had a sponsor box on the back. Rip clean look.
 
Red Crow said:
Yeah so I reckon you can pretty much take it to the bank that its Hungry Jacks sponsoring the Crows, just reading between many lines.

If so, and assuming they take both spots, hopefully they do the buns logo above the number and go with just the text for below the number. That full square logo that West Coast had for a bit was terrible!

Regardless, it’ll be a sad day losing a text only sponsor from the back. Only a single one-off game in 2009 has had a sponsor box on the back. Rip clean look.
Click to expand...

anyone else hate the above number sponsors? Just me?
 
Sam Hall said:
Yes and No. I do hate them but the way Melbourne has done there’s with Beyond Bank is very slick and it looks good. That’s how they should look.
Click to expand...
I feel there may be a bit of bias there but I agree. I just don’t want our game to end up becoming billboards. Although it does already look like we’re going that route.
 
Red Crow said:
Yeah so I reckon you can pretty much take it to the bank that its Hungry Jacks sponsoring the Crows, just reading between many lines.
Click to expand...
I thought the original clue was that it was an American Burger joint? I've always thought of HJs being 'Australian' even if it was just a shoot off from Burger King.

Anyway, if it truly is then something like this could work. Yellow text would just get lost against the hoops and the number I feel.


1636089982351.png
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

magpienato said:
I thought the original clue was that it was an American Burger joint? I've always thought of HJs being 'Australian' even if it was just a shoot off from Burger King.

Anyway, if it truly is then something like this could work. Yellow text would just get lost against the hoops and the number I feel.


View attachment 1274577
Click to expand...

To me, I consider Hungry Jacks an American company that just uses a different name in Australia. Just like I wouldn’t call McDonald’s Aussie just cos they like to call themselves Macca’s these days.

That mockup would be nice, but I’d be (pleasantly) surprised if it eventuated. There hasn’t been a whole lot of room between the number and first hoop lately, so I feel like about the best we could hope for is the old red text in white box overlapping into the hoops.
 
Anyone know what brand thiese boots are? Noticed a few Eagles boys wearing these boots today
6284B733-1CC2-4CD2-907C-7DE3C1306683.jpeg
 
DylanK said:
anyone else hate the above number sponsors? Just me?
Click to expand...

Most team sponsorship looks plain awful, slap a big box without any regard to the design of the jumper and job done. Looking at my own club, Ed could jump up and down all he wanted about Collingwood being black and white, but with the size and scale of the sponsor tramp stamps, blind Freddie even knew that was a laugh.

The AFL and club administrators make so many visits to the NFL as if it's a mecha of sports administration higher learning.... but clearly end up spending more time at NASCAR night school.

If they did go the NFL route, the AFL could cleanskin the jumpers for league wide national sponsors, making it more attractive to the big corporates. Digital stadium signage and prime time broadcast advertising packages would make for a compelling spend. Especially if potential clashes with competitor brands are no longer an issue.

Clubs wouldn't have to live and die by the whim of the major sponsor as has been the case in the past. They still forge corporate partnerships obviously, but the main dollars are guaranteed by the AFL in a national deal.

I think either Monday night or Thursday night football has to work in order to make the strategy a success.... but we are talking jumpers here not the big picture so going back to my original point: they are mostly poor, design wise and should go; but as clubs are the advertisers whores, it ain't going to happen.
 
acm21 said:
I'm more interested in the fact they are isc socks. No idea about the brand thought it was nike at first
Click to expand...
Official training hasn’t started. A small group of lads out there at the club training

932BC327-FF87-4A8A-98BC-C6BA7CECDC13.jpeg
 
Is that a new brand in footy? Seen a few of the nike boys cross to them
 
bammac said:
Most team sponsorship looks plain awful, slap a big box without any regard to the design of the jumper and job done. Looking at my own club, Ed could jump up and down all he wanted about Collingwood being black and white, but with the size and scale of the sponsor tramp stamps, blind Freddie even knew that was a laugh.

The AFL and club administrators make so many visits to the NFL as if it's a mecha of sports administration higher learning.... but clearly end up spending more time at NASCAR night school.

If they did go the NFL route, the AFL could cleanskin the jumpers for league wide national sponsors, making it more attractive to the big corporates. Digital stadium signage and prime time broadcast advertising packages would make for a compelling spend. Especially if potential clashes with competitor brands are no longer an issue.

Clubs wouldn't have to live and die by the whim of the major sponsor as has been the case in the past. They still forge corporate partnerships obviously, but the main dollars are guaranteed by the AFL in a national deal.

I think either Monday night or Thursday night football has to work in order to make the strategy a success.... but we are talking jumpers here not the big picture so going back to my original point: they are mostly poor, design wise and should go; but as clubs are the advertisers whores, it ain't going to happen.
Click to expand...

NewsCorp tried that in 1997 for Super League but DB Breweries who sponsored the Auckland Warriors at the time, weren't happy with the name of one of their Beers, DB Bitter, being removed from the jerseys. I'd expect similar backlash from sponsors if that were to happen in the AFL.
 
THE A5 said:
Anyone know what brand thiese boots are? Noticed a few Eagles boys wearing these boots today
View attachment 1274699
Click to expand...
The brand is called Concave and that specific model is the Concave Halo. they were kinda popular around 2016. maybe the players were given these boots back then and they just use them for training or something. ive seen a couple of players wear them since then but not many.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

The Victorian
News AFLW 2024 New Jumpers
Replies
4
Views
897
acm21
acm21
caloschwaby
Discussion Full 2024 AFL Kit Matchup Spreadsheet
Replies
4
Views
687
mcgarnacle
mcgarnacle
The Victorian
Discussion AFLW 2023: New Jumpers; Round-by-Round Discussion
4 5 6 7 8
Replies
175
Views
14K
Gibbsy
Gibbsy
BigChippa52
Portfolio LCFL (Formerly WBFL) Blackout kits
Replies
12
Views
520
BigChippa52
BigChippa52
RWB_Threads
Portfolio AFL 3 Kits Policy
Replies
21
Views
2K
fethers17
fethers17
RedmanWasHere
  • Locked
Discussion New AFLW Jumpers for 2022 (Season 7)
2 3
Replies
68
Views
7K
Red Crow
Red Crow
BigChippa52
Portfolio AFL Black Out Kits (in the style of GWS never surrender)
2
Replies
42
Views
2K
BigChippa52
BigChippa52

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top