Scandal Nude pics of Cloke, Swan released

[MagpieJo]

Were their genitalia offensively large or inoffensively small?
What will their partners say?
Is it anyone's business anyhow?

You've mixed up your measurements!

 

[MagpieJo]

I'd be more interested in the colour of said utensils, more than the size and shape, just to know how prevalent a certain medication is.

Wrong team jerk

 

[Rich01]

If I had to pick two blokes from the pies that would be stupid enough to do this, the first two names that come to mind are Cloke and Swan. Taylor Adams a not too distant third.

 

[TheSunGod]

Miss Piggy: "THAT'S WHAT YOU GET"

Miss Piggy after posting revenge pr0n.

 

[SBYM]

I see the funny side when it's not your players

hahahahaha!!

Quality.

 

[gavaniacono]

If I had to pick two blokes from the pies that would be stupid enough to do this, the first two names that come to mind are Cloke and Swan. Taylor Adams a not too distant third.

Dangerous territory. Our club has its fair share of w***ers too.

 

[SBYM]

So essentially...

It is against AFL rules for any listed player to log a bit of redtube time and rub one out to Amatuer College Action??

 

[SBYM]

Top lawyers also told Essendon IN. THE. BAG. hence I'm somewhat sceptical...

 

[Selwoods_Slot]

People don't actually believe that Swan & Cloak sent naked pics of themselves to complete strangers.. Do they??

It sounds like some loser scumbag hacked their phone/Insta accounts and then sold the photos to Women's Day.

The Men who allegedly sold these photos, and the desperate old hags at Women's Day who published them give normal women a bad name!!!

 

[Rich01]

Dangerous territory. Our club has its fair share of ******s too.

Yep, and if our players were this stupid I'd ridicule them as well.
Although with Swan and Cloke, I'm not really surprised.

 

[SterlingArcher]

How exactly?

How exactly does it not come under B?

Besides, I will guarantee that the women didn't hand the pics over with the "too rude" paint art over the dicks, so they distributed a picture with the genital region exposed, so that breaks the law

 

[SBYM]

No it is not right, which is what the "feminist media" have been saying all along.

It isn't the feminists that are being hypocritical here, it is the likes of Eddie Macguire and the "Sunrise" crew who have been guilty of victim blaming.

All jokes aside (on my behalf)...exactly this.

Any person with intelligence will see both instances for what they are...illegal invasions of a person's privacy.

 

[SterlingArcher]

People don't actually believe that Swan & Cloak sent naked pics of themselves to complete strangers.. Do they??

It sounds like some loser scumbag hacked their phone/Insta accounts and then sold the photos to Women's Day.

The Men who allegedly sold these photos, and the desperate old hags at Women's Day who published them give normal women a bad name!!!

It sounds like Cloke & Swan have side-women they have flings with that they sent nudes to and shouldn't have. Still doesn't change the fact that whoever gave the nudes to Womens Day broke the law.

 

[Smoky]

It sounds like Cloke & Swan have side-women they have flings with that they sent nudes to and shouldn't have. Still doesn't change the fact that whoever gave the nudes to Womens Day broke the law.

Which law?

 

[SterlingArcher]

All jokes aside (on my behalf)...exactly this.

Any person with intelligence will see both instances for what they are...illegal invasions of a person's privacy.

Clementine Ford summed it up well. She's as feminist as they come and still could see that it was the wrong thing to have happened.

 

[SterlingArcher]

Which law?

The new Vic law about distributing nudes that has been posted heaps of times in this thread?

 

[Smoky]

The new Vic law about distributing nudes that has been posted heaps of times in this thread?

Sorry mate...

Have tried to avoid the trolling in this thread... P.S:- You're not talking about the Revenge pr0n thing are you? Cause I don't think she broke a law???

 

[Selwoods_Slot]

It sounds like Cloke & Swan have side-women they have flings with that they sent nudes to and shouldn't have. Still doesn't change the fact that whoever gave the nudes to Womens Day broke the law.

Whatever the case is, it's none of our business if someone sends a nude shot of themselves to someone else! Guys (even guys with gf's) do that sort of s**t all the time... Why are women's day publishing them? They've definitely broken the law regarding privacy and distributing revenge pr0n images... I don't know about having flings on the side... Maybe they sent some pics? But I don't believe they would be that stupid. I think phones were hacked. I mean why would they send over Instagram and not just sent privately? It sounds like BS to me

 

[jatz14]

Agree with this. What sort of chick does this? The girls involved should be locked up.

Yes, they should leave it to the guys

Sent from my XT1068 using Tapatalk

 

[Komrade_Tiger]

Sorry mate...

Have tried to avoid the trolling in this thread... P.S:- You're not talking about the Revenge pr0n thing are you? Cause I don't think she broke a law???

Yes he is referring to the revenge pr0n, and yes she did as people have posted which bit/s of the law she would be in breach of

 

[jatz14]

Adult men and women engaging in private consensual sexting.

Wow who'd have thunk it in 2016.

No crime. No issue. No big deal.

Move on.

It isn't the sexting which is a big deal, it is the selling of it to a magazine

Sent from my XT1068 using Tapatalk

 

[Smoky]

Yes he is referring to the revenge pr0n, and yes she did as people have posted which bit/s of the law she would be in breach of

Ummm....

A Nude photo is not pr0n.

(It's a nude photo).

 

[Komrade_Tiger]

Ummm....

A Nude photo is not pr0n.

(It's a nude photo).

section 41DA of theSummary Offences Act prohibits the “intentional distribution of an intimate image where that distribution is contrary to community standards of acceptable conduct”. It means that if you create an intimate image, and send it to someone, it is against the law to for them to intentionally send it to a third party, without your consent. The maximum penalty is two years imprisonment.

one quick google of the revenge pr0n law's bring that up ^ so yes, it is in fact illegal

 

[JUBJUB]

Give Rita the eater eater and Susie O'brien time to write their stories.

Tipped it

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/op...t/news-story/1816e8c2001eec3c5bad19c9905f708b

 

[Smoky]

one quick google of the revenge pr0n law's bring that up ^ so yes, it is in fact illegal

Thankyou.

Clarity through the mess...


Appreciated Post