Rightly so as well. Who wouldn't do everything in their power to keep a 22 year old 200cm ruck/forward who just had a season where he kicked 55 goals?
The issue wasn't trying to keep Tippo - the issue was the sloppiness of the deal.
The issue is knowing what we did with his contract.
When you consider we backed ourselves into keeping him despite:
1. His willingness to be traded to brisbane. Consider that he had to be a flight risk because he was happy to go. When we approached him about Brisbane's offer he gave it the thumbs up.
2. The contract we signed.
Between those 2 things the veto was trigg sized **** up of the highest order
But in ordinary circumstances without the above? You're probably right.