Potential for serious injury

Remove this Banner Ad

Using your argument, it was 'possible' for Silvagni to have connected in a more forceful manner and decapitated Cripps.

The potential for serious injury card is nonsensical and appears to have only been used against Hawthorn players.
yeah...nah

an backhanded elbow to the head is(or historically hass been) common place in football.

Hodge's move on swallow is like a street fighter move
 
Had Fyfe made contact 2 inches to the right he could have caused a dislocation of the C2-C3 vertabrate, causing the spinal cord to be severed and almost certain death from asphyxiation.

Chad Wingards mark of the year could have resulted in trauma to the vertebral artery cause by a knee to the back of neck resulting in death from bleeding into the brain.

Anyone can make up anything they want final destination style when you deal in complete hypotheticals.

name the rule ehat it actually is and thats "the give the MRP the ability to go outside the system in order to appease the outraged media and public" rule.
 
Hodge incident with Swallow was disgraceful and ridiculously stupid- he is extremely lucky he didnt connect- thrusting forearm 'uppercut' to swallows throat/head- if he had have hit him flush swallow would likely end up in hospital and Hodge would likely end up in a court of law.

Hodge is a very lucky boy, who clearly has received the 'good bloke' rub a few times.


But, of course- it's a Hawk conspiracy
What a load of crap.

For starters, he did connect with Swallows head. That's why he got three weeks. And what's this court of law crap?? Did Barry Hall end up in court? Did Silvagni? Did the old mate who tackled McKinnon in the league.

Won't argue that it wasn't stupid. Every Hawks supporter will agree there, but there was no leniency for being a good bloke. :rolleyes:
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top