- Sep 18, 2013
- 4,709
- 12,399
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
- Other Teams
- NOLA
Whos got the goss?
How long is sincmagic out for?
And what did he do to get suspended?
How long is sincmagic out for?
And what did he do to get suspended?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Im not adverse to this.We've taken a lot of prime rookie projects in the main draft which is why the quality is down. Maybe for this initial draft only we should pick 48 players and be allowed to just select our 4 rookies (would need to be valid) at the end of the draft?
Also PetWussy Ryan lester is mid only.
We've taken a lot of prime rookie projects in the main draft which is why the quality is down. Maybe for this initial draft only we should pick 48 players and be allowed to just select our 4 rookies (would need to be valid) at the end of the draft?
Also PetWussy Ryan lester is mid only.
Yeah same, that's why I've been leaving some zero gamers that I probably could have taken...44 players?
And I've drafted on the theory that there is a separate rookie draft.
Sorry yes I meant 44 and I think we've drafted on various different wrinkles through this but if you think it would reduce the integrity of it you're right to flag it and keep to the original plan on this front.44 players?
And I've drafted on the theory that there is a separate rookie draft.
I'm definitely not keen on being able to decide any player can go on your rookie list after the draft, even if they do meet the criteria. It just wouldn't sit right with me that I could have blokes like Weitering and Weideman on the rookie list when I snapped them pretty early in the draft.
At this stage we will keep things as they are until the end of the national draft and pre-season drafts. Once we know what the pool looks like we will have a better idea of whether we should broaden the rookie eligibility.
The rookie draft isn't really meant to be used for depth unless you want a Jed Adcock type over a long-shot prospect. I just like the idea of a Jack Sinclair type joining a senior list because somebody backed him when he was a nobody rather than someone signing him as a free agent when he put a few good games together.
Free agency is there for depth, rookie list is there for prospects that would have otherwise been fantasy insignificant.
I agree. I hope.I think that St Kilda Death found a gem in Phillips, I wouldn't be surprised to see him be Carlton's number 1 ruckman when Kreuzer gets put on the long-term injury list.
I'm pretty happy with Wright also, he can be a pretty handy scorer and should have fairly good job security. Hopefully Carlton play him in the guts.
It was between Campbell, Nyuon and him for my last two picks. I just saw the others route to the 1st 22 as easier. Phillips started pre season as 4th ruck on the list and I know the Carlton bf board say he is absolutely killing it But I just figured it was more to ask.I agree. I hope.
Think he will play from rd1 as a fwd/ruck until kruz breaks.
I see him as clearly the 2nd ruck after kruz.It was between Campbell, Nyuon and him for my last two picks. I just saw the others route to the 1st 22 as easier. Phillips started pre season as 4th ruck on the list and I know the Carlton bf board say he is absolutely killing it But I just figured it was more to ask.
Could easily be wrong though.........unfortunately!
I see him as Carltons No 1 tbh. Kruzer is too agile not to be utilised in the fwd line!I see him as clearly the 2nd ruck after kruz.
And a solid fwd too.
Campell seemed out of favour.
And think Nyuon will struggle for a game behind luenberger, bellchambers and McKernan.
But i could easily be wrong too!
I only see him as the ruck because thats where they seem to keep playing him.I see him as Carltons No 1 tbh. Kruzer is too agile not to be utilised in the fwd line!