Now I know that it will probably never change but I have felt that the Security Council's biggest weakness in dealing with conflicts has been giving the 5 permanent members the right to veto. Created in the aftermath of WW2 I understand why this happened and yes the Council have done some good things but I have felt that over the years that the Security Council has somewhat failed in its original goal which was to maintain world peace.
If you could change the way in which the Security Council operated, how would you change it?
For me I would:
Remove the veto so only majority rules on resolutions,
Keep the permanent members but include Germany and Brazil,
Still have 15 members, so thats 7 permanent members and 8 members on a rotating basis which they do now,
Rotating regions are:
Asia-Pacific - 2 Members
Africa - 2 Members
Europe + Other - 2 Members
Latin America + Caribbean - 2 Members
If you could change the way in which the Security Council operated, how would you change it?
For me I would:
Remove the veto so only majority rules on resolutions,
Keep the permanent members but include Germany and Brazil,
Still have 15 members, so thats 7 permanent members and 8 members on a rotating basis which they do now,
Rotating regions are:
Asia-Pacific - 2 Members
Africa - 2 Members
Europe + Other - 2 Members
Latin America + Caribbean - 2 Members