- Banned
- #1
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don’t mind paying. And I’m a net rubbish remover. But you can see where this is going. And it’s not good.I've used a few free camps around Victoria. Some of them were ok, tidy, peaceful, as you'd want in a campsite generally away from towns and people.
But most of the time, the camps were either packed solid with people, had rubbish all over the place, or were damaged by people camping in inappropriate spots. For me, it's pretty clear that people don't respect free camps, and why would they, they've paid nothing for its use, they've got no committment to keeping it neat and tidy. For me, as a hiker who practices leave no trace wherever possible, it's awful to see. Just another demonstration of how humans just don't respect the environment in the way that we should.
We camped up at The Glasshouse near Lake Tyers on Australia Day this year. Campsite was full, that's fair. Half the sites had loud (really loud) music playing until after midnight. Bushes near the lake were full of toilet paper, bottles and cans, even full rubbish bags. We packed out what we could but it was gross.
Yes I'm aware that not every free camper does this. And I'm sure someone can find examples of free camps being neat and tidy, of campers being responsible.
So, you know what? If it costs me a small sum to ensure that we can have sustainable camping sites (with bins and toilets), with capacity control, designated sites for camping and for fires, regular maintenance and with measures to ensure that adverse behaviour can be reported and consequences occur, I'll happily pay it. Consider it a educational fee in leave no trace principles.
Besides, even if they establish these "hundreds" of free camps along the rivers, there'll still be plenty of free camps around.
I don’t mind paying. And I’m a net rubbish remover. But you can see where this is going. And it’s not good.
“Camping will only take place on suitable sites”.
And I have. Personally. It’s Dan’s fault that his only solution is lockdowns and lockups.It's not Dan's fault people have abused the privilege of the free camps. What did you think was going to happen? This is kinder level stuff, if you can't treat something with respect it'll be taken away from you.
You shuold be pointing your judgmental finger at the campers whose actions have brought about this (possible) outcome.
And I have. Personally. It’s Dan’s fault that his only solution is lockdowns and lockups.
Not following. What's the issue?
It's not Dan's fault people have abused the privilege of the free camps. What did you think was going to happen? This is kinder level stuff, if you can't treat something with respect it'll be taken away from you.
You shuold be pointing your judgmental finger at the campers whose actions have brought about this (possible) outcome.
That's actually a decent solution - allows people doing the right thing to continue to camp for free.Need a free permit type system for free camping, where you need to nominate where you will camp at. Too many people are doing the wrong thing.
There needs to be clear rules and if you break them you can be fined etc…
That's actually a decent solution - allows people doing the right thing to continue to camp for free.
I wonder if any of the people outraged by this actually do camp regularly. A lot of my camping is either on private land, or on hikes/bike packing trips and as a general rule the less accessible the camp, the cleaner it is. On one overnight hike last year I only saw one piece of rubbish the whole hike (yes I picked it up and took it with me).
I'd be aboard that. Probably a good safety measure too for the more remote type stuff.That's actually a decent solution - allows people doing the right thing to continue to camp for free.
I wonder if any of the people outraged by this actually do camp regularly. A lot of my camping is either on private land, or on hikes/bike packing trips and as a general rule the less accessible the camp, the cleaner it is. On one overnight hike last year I only saw one piece of rubbish the whole hike (yes I picked it up and took it with me).
We going to close all the beaches too?
Hang on, forget I said that.
Hmm..you going to have a go at Port Philip council, City of Melb, Mornington council etc for doing the most unaustralian of things, making us pay to park at the beach?!
I'd be aboard that. Probably a good safety measure too for the more remote type stuff.
And as I said elsewhere, I'd happily pay a, say, $500pa license fee too.
I don't expect free sh*t.
Still not following, I understand the press release, but what is BFB issue? Is it a good thing, bad thing? I am failing to read between the lines.
Not following. What's the issue?
They're not opening spots for camping, they're closing them. Then the spots that are made available will be "user friendly" thus removing the adventure of the free camping that many of us enjoy. Under cover of "the environment".
I'm not saying you are wrong, but where is the report that they are closing them?They're not opening spots for camping, they're closing them. Then the spots that are made available will be "user friendly" thus removing the adventure of the free camping that many of us enjoy. Under cover of "the environment".
I'm not saying you are wrong, but where is the report that they are closing them?