Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 9
The Golden Ticket - Corporate tickets, functions, Open Air Boxes at the Adelaide Oval, ENGIE, Gabba, MCG, Marvel, Optus & People First Stadiums. Corporate Suites at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Why would you sign up to BigFooty to post specifically in this thread?
Pretty standard Tinder pickup technique from the misc types - be completely obnoxious/irreverent to show of your alphaness
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
First of all it is not a complete transcript, there is a lot more on that recording than what was shown in the media. And...there is a bit where she actually jokes about jumping off the balcony. Its was said in jest exactly as GT said it in jest. The final time he said it was when he was subduing her, and even then, hes said it with an air of exasperation, no way was he angry or with a raised voice.
Spot on KFC. There is absolutely no evidence at all to show Tostee has ever behaved anyhting but honourably in relation to the women he took home.
You're off the mark. He said on the transcript he was amazed at how strong he was. Size diffrence didnt stop her beating him up - he was covered in scratches as verified by forensic examination.
A 10 yo diagnosis when he was a developig teen which is now irrelevant. A recent examination by a psychiatrist says he is not autistic. Source: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-11-...erer-has-social-disorders-court-hears/5900308
Thats quite an understatement. Warriena is actually agrressive throughout the entire recording and the listener is left in no doubt in regard to this.
False. Tostee treated her with respect and tolerance the entire time up until she went too far and seriously assaulted him. Again, the entire recording shows this clearly and the listener is left in no doubt in regards to this. Furthermore, they were both consenting adults - this includes consenting to the alcohol that was consumed.
Except the audio transcript published in the papers is false in parts. Also it has not been admitted as evidence to a court yet so its not a FACT as you claim. To imply Tostee was manipulative of women is slander, as there is absolutely no proof of that. He has a clean record to date (no convictions).
Tostee is speaking in a detached way the same way all people do when they make an observation. Are you telling us you have never said to yourself in a whisper "thats bullshyt" or something like that? Come on, to imply he is speaking to an audience is just fantasy.
You could infer that, but your credibility would be pretty low. As for entertaining others, I do not believe posting snapshots of Phone chat conversations is being manipulative of women, exactly how does it manipulate them? As it see it, you are slandering the accused again .
Ausgirl, how would you know what Warriena drank that night? A: You dont. Also how would you know they didnt go out again to buy more alcohol? A: you dont. Despite this there's no shortage of slanderous unproven allegations from you again, about the accused in relation to what he "probably" did.Your comments have little credibility, if any.
A song and dance? False. He just calmly mentioning to her she is over the top. This is an hour beofre the actual final altercation.
How DARE he keep pouring! Is that an arrestable offence, is it? Whatever slur you put on it, there is nothing at all , not one instance, of Tostee forcing himself or anything onto Warriena.
Rile her up? could you please note the point where this is supposed to have happened.? Because as I have said, Tostee remain calm at all times, even in the face of repeated physical and verbal agression. I would say his efforts are sterling to maintain composure as he did.
She asks him to untie her, but they were having rough sex. That was consensual . They do have sex again after that as well. There is nothing in their conversation to suggest she is at all frightened at this time you are speaking of. On the contrary it is Tostee who is frightened as Warriena has been getting off on abusing him all night .
False. there is no way of knowing where here phone was. She was right "out of it" and it appears hes looked through her stuff at the end of the bed (which she refused to look through herself). Maybe it was in there? He's located it somehwere. He then gave the phone to her. Yet you try to twist it . There are many reasons why her phone could have ended up in his pocket later, not the least of which is that he accidentally picked it up when collecting his phones during his panicked state when he left the apartment. He did have multiple phones, its possible one was the same model as hers.
That is an outright lie. She threatens to call the Police at 00:40:00 on the recording. He encourages her to do so. Do not twist that by mating it up to the final struggle which happened at 01:20:00, ie 40 minutes later. You really should get details right beofre posting misleading statements that appear to vilify the accused.
your colouring perception again. She is 5'6" (not tiny), does Muay Thai,. Tostee is 9 inches taller than her, but he is not large. Nor is he a bodybuilder as falsely reported. in all the mainstream media. He is forced to choke her because she is holding a metallic object that she grabbed to hit him with. It took 70 secs for her to drop it, even whilst being choked. She's no wallflower, thats for sure. Tostee was scared, and had to take action.
You're still twisting things. It is actually aggressive behaviour, because at that point she could have been out the door already, as a few minutes earlier Tostee had told her to leave. But did she leave? No, she went beserk, broke free, ran all over his apartment and trashed it again, then out on the balcony. Totally psychotic.
Another beautiful example of twisting and cherry picking facts. ITs only because Tostee finally "mans up" and takes control of the situation, that she finally realises the jig is up, and pulls her head in. Yep her voice goes soft. But what does she do when he lets her go? Yep, goes beserk. You should hear the stuff that comes out of her mouth. When they jury hears that, it will most likely from a very strong impression in their minds of what sort of state her mind is in..
He suggested it might be there, he never said it was. And where was it? Theres no indicator of where it was found, hence you are slandering the accused by falsely claiming he lied.
An offhand comment about a balcony is NOT rasing a topic as you claim. IT is interesting to note that Warriena herslef made a comment in isolation about jumping off the balcony, so why are you not pushing the line she planted the idea in her head herself, then acted it out? Oh, thats right, it doesnt fit in with your agenda of bashing the accused.
Yes thats the beauty of the net, anonymous people like you can troll as much slander as they like with impunity. Are you aware your IP address can be traced very easily in the case of a libel suit being lodged and investigated?
I dont see how he is absolving himself from anything, considering he recorded the whole thing. Its glaring things like this that blow holes in your whole argument. Th accused clearly didnt feel comfortable witht Warriena, and started recording to protect himself. Seems fairly obvious and logical, despite your spin.
Nice.
Ive highlighted what I believe Ausgirls motives are. Shes slandering the accused on a few websites. She has a definite agenda.
So you're both telling lies then.
I was talking about the poster using technicalities such as Tostee willingly recorded it so he must be in the right.
All of them were running a bar but there were many degrees of responsibility so who knows how the law will see.
Not sure who you are referring to, but I said "The accused clearly didnt feel comfortable witht Warriena, and started recording to protect himself." I didnt mean it protected him in court , but the recording does shed light on many things that in their absence, would prejuduce the accused much more.
He was diagnosed as autistic at the time in 2004. It was mentioned in the court proceedings. Trumped up? Wrong.
Its false to say he sacked Potts Lawyers, they may have withdrawn. The reason he changed lawyers has not been published, but you seem to magically have the answer.
Nice how Ausgirl has already decided the guilt of the accused, and in the same breath draws an inference that a distinguished member of the legal fraternity has no right to act on behalf of people who are facing charges? Bias much?
